Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nx"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 585808 by Nx (Talk))
(Undo revision 585819 by 86.40.210.112 (Talk))
Line 84: Line 84:
 
::::Thanks for fixing that. --[[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>equestrian for the ladies</font>]]</sup> 10:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Thanks for fixing that. --[[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>equestrian for the ladies</font>]]</sup> 10:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::No need to apologise, thanks! [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>i9</sup>]] 10:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::No need to apologise, thanks! [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>i9</sup>]] 10:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
== Will you just leave? ==
 
 
You are the cancer destroying this site from the inside out. Will you please just fuck off and get a fucking life. You ruined this site with your constant crusade to introduce 'policies' where none was needed, and an even more imbicilic endeavour to 'regulate the internetz'. In short, you are the Prince of the Geeks, the fearless champion of technocracy and regulation and dullardness in a Kingdom that desires none of these things. Will you please just grow the fuck up and get a life? [[User:Contrary|Contrary]] ([[User talk:Contrary|talk]]) 22:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 23:08, 14 May 2010

Archives:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15


Why do you revel in ruining this site?

Before you came along this site was a libertarian paradise, where ideas were paramount, not pathetic policies, or 'site layout'. You're an úber-geek who has single handedly ruined this website. How does that make you feel? 86.40.207.29 (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

über is spelled with an ü, not an ú. -- Nx / talk 22:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I thought I was the one who ruined the site? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Puhleeze. I created the whole ruining this site meme. -- Nx / talk 22:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't know how you can live with yourself, having single handedly turned this place into a parody of sexually deviant wikipedia geeks, dying to enforce policy, and generally attempting to masturbate over documents such as WP:NPA etc. Geek. 86.40.99.232 (talk) 09:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

He has turned this into the National Parks Authority? - π 09:31, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I think he meant National Postdoctoral Association. AnarchoGoon Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living 15:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Nx,

I'm not trying to harass anyone. I just noticed that my question had been removed from TK's talk page. I actually thought I did it myself when I left his talk page, so I placed the question back again when I was checking to see if there was an answer from him.

I'm more familiar with the procedures for making article contributions (though I only contribute every few months) than I am conversing with editors, but I'm also still trying to familiarize myself with the various guidelines for each online encyclopedia. I'm not very familiar with the procedures for leaving questions for editors, so I end up fumbling around their talk pages not sure if that's how/where I'm supposed to talk to them.

To add to the confusion, I actually just made a contribution to a Conservapedia article, but the particular editor for that article is a Wikipedia editor. I couldn't find TK's talk page on Conservapedia, but followed the links and wound up here. Also, I'm not sure how to log in on Wikipedia when I'm required to use an alias for my contributions here, while being required to use my actual name for contributions to Conservapedia. Hence, I'm a little confused here...

If you could help or advise, I would greatly appreciate it. And if I'm not supposed to leave a question on TK's talk page, can you tell me where I should ask him about my contributions to Conservapedia? I'm not seeing a way to do that on Conservapedia itself...

Thank you so much, DeanneB98.223.220.154 (talk) 00:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

It has all been archived. TK can't answer you, he is blocked. - π 00:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
No, Pi, this -- Nx / talk 00:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Well that falls under Wikipedia's problem. - π 00:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

"If you could help or advise, I would greatly appreciate it. And if I'm not supposed to leave a question on TK's talk page, can you tell me where I should ask him about my contributions to Conservapedia? I'm not seeing a way to do that on Conservapedia itself... " That sounds like a Conservapedia issue. He has his e-mail and chat listed on his userpage over there, AFAIK. P-Foster (talk) 15:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Ugly

Despite all the good stuff you do here there is something that offends my aesthetic sensibilities. On your voting indicator bars the white spacing to the right is unbalanced unless there are votes for all three options. Sorry if this seems picky.  Lily Inspirate me. 09:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

My humble apologies, I was using the IE rendering engine. It looks fine on Chrome.  Lily Inspirate me. 13:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Could you upload a screenshot to show me exactly what the problem is? -- Nx / talk 19:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Ye Gods

What the...............what happened with all these blocks you are undoing? Acei9 10:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know, Apparently Human and some others think blocking sprees are funny, but blocking for 24 hours on a blocking spree is a bit too much, and I think I spotted some non-sysops there too. -- Nx / talk 10:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Oh, well thanks muchly for sorting that out - logged on saw your unblock binge, wondered WTF? Acei9 10:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry about that, I considered just wiping the block table clean, but decided to go with this instead since it's more transparent. -- Nx / talk 10:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. --ConcernedResident equestrian for the ladies 10:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
No need to apologise, thanks! Acei9 10:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)