Talk:Rule 34

Deletion

I motion for this article to be deleted. It has no possible application to our mission statement. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:07, 26 February 2009 (EST)

We don't need a big long article full of furry pictures the way ED has, but Rule 34 is still pretty cool, and can troll Conservapedia pretty well. .mymyrteax 23:09, 26 February 2009 (EST)

(EC) Deletion motion seconded. ListenerX^TalkerX 23:09, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Thirded. _and marmite 23:12, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Now hold on a moment... [1] ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ yes, JAVASCAP

Good grief! .mymyrteax 23:20, 26 February 2009 (EST)

I can't believe this was deleted after such little discussion especially after such a reliable reference as xkcd was found. I demand it be restored. - User $\scriptstyle {\sqrt {12}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }(-3)^{-n}(2n+1)^{-1}$ 23:30, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Was that a joke? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:32, 26 February 2009 (EST)

I'm waiting. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:38, 26 February 2009 (EST)

But Rule 34 is HOT! .mymyrteax 23:39, 26 February 2009 (EST)

So's your mom. Can I write an article about her? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:42, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Sure. .mymyrteax 23:42, 26 February 2009 (EST)

(EC²) It is irrelevant to our mission. ListenerX^TalkerX 23:43, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Wow no wonder you deleted it after only 17 minutes of discussion if two minutes is to long to wait for a reply. Why was it not on mission? We already have an article on mymyrteax' mum. - User $\scriptstyle {\sqrt {12}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }(-3)^{-n}(2n+1)^{-1}$ 23:44, 26 February 2009 (EST)