|
|
Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| <vote poll=wigo887 | img="on">[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=prev&oldid=586034#Thank_you Ken to Jessica:] "It's hard to resist the sweet reasonableness of a tender hearted Conservapedian of the female persuasion. :)" Awww, shucks! Ken's pretending to be straight! Update: Ken broke the link. Updated.</vote> | | <vote poll=wigo887 | img="on">[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=prev&oldid=586034#Thank_you Ken to Jessica:] "It's hard to resist the sweet reasonableness of a tender hearted Conservapedian of the female persuasion. :)" Awww, shucks! Ken's pretending to be straight! Update: Ken broke the link. Updated.</vote> |
| <vote poll=wigo886 | img="on">Oh, boy! The new [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&oldid=585591 stupidity] is out! '''UPDATE:''' [[Schlafly Statistics]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMystery%3AWhy_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&diff=585623&oldid=585621 still to come]? '''UPDATER''' [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery%3AWhy_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&diff=585927&oldid=585705 Bullshit statistics are GO!]</vote> | | <vote poll=wigo886 | img="on">Oh, boy! The new [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&oldid=585591 stupidity] is out! '''UPDATE:''' [[Schlafly Statistics]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMystery%3AWhy_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&diff=585623&oldid=585621 still to come]? '''UPDATER''' [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery%3AWhy_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&diff=585927&oldid=585705 Bullshit statistics are GO!]</vote> |
− | <vote poll=wigo885>[[cp:user:Bugler|Bugler]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=584241 "You are an idiot"] (and 61 other insults towards 4 sysops and a (formerly) respected editor) -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=next&oldid=584477 verbal warning for personal remarks]<br /> | + | <vote poll=wigo885 | img="on">[[cp:user:Bugler|Bugler]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=584241 "You are an idiot"] (and 61 other insults towards 4 sysops and a (formerly) respected editor) -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=next&oldid=584477 verbal warning for personal remarks]<br /> |
| [[cp:user:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=584561 Do (people) think that 'you are an idiot'?] -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Ed+Poor&page=User%3ABRichtigen&year=&month=-1 1 day block for personal remarks]<br /> | | [[cp:user:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=584561 Do (people) think that 'you are an idiot'?] -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Ed+Poor&page=User%3ABRichtigen&year=&month=-1 1 day block for personal remarks]<br /> |
| [[cp:user:HelpJazz|HelpJazz]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BRichtigen&diff=584803&oldid=584309 "Do you see any incongruity here??"] -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Ed+Poor&page=User%3AHelpJazz&year=&month=-1 1 WEEK block for personal remarks], Later [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:HelpJazz unblocked], probably because we drew attention to it.<br /> | | [[cp:user:HelpJazz|HelpJazz]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BRichtigen&diff=584803&oldid=584309 "Do you see any incongruity here??"] -- [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Ed+Poor&page=User%3AHelpJazz&year=&month=-1 1 WEEK block for personal remarks], Later [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:HelpJazz unblocked], probably because we drew attention to it.<br /> |
Revision as of 07:16, 16 December 2008
Template:AOTW Navigation
Keep up to date with all the insanity at extremist Christian conservative blog Conservapedia right here. This page is for rolling reports of the strange, contradictory or humorous activity at Conservapedia.
Archives:
The "up/down" (click on the green and red arrows!) voting is preserved after archiving and is used by the Best of Conservapedia page to allow people to find the highest quality lulz from our many entries.[1]
Add new contributions to the top of this list, and copy the formatting carefully so the polls work properly. Each new entry gets an ID number one higher than the previous one.
Please check older entries to avoid duplication - especially if you see something that's been going on for hours - there's a good chance that someone else has seen it and added it already.
Brevity is the soul of wit. If it can't be said in two lines, then it's probably not that noteworthy, really.
Do not remove items from the list unless you believe they are legally slanderous or otherwise likely to be "detrimental to RationalWiki". Comment out (<!-- WIGO-->) an item if you think it's really an issue. If you think an item is not worthwhile, just vote it down - "one man's boredom is another man's lulz".
Caveat: Due to conservative deceit, some page links from this page to Conservapedia may be broken. To help combat this, WIGO items from late September 2008 on have their links to CP automatically uploaded as images to RW. If a link is down, click the img link to see what it was. Also, anyone not wanting to go to CP can use this to see what everyone is talking about.
What is going on?
EZ edit button
| 8 | Thisimg from the man who created red links for BDSM and Swinging. |
| 54 | American History Homework Twelve Answers - Student 25img says "Russia" when he means the entire USSR, says that the Vietnam and Korean wars were "the two wars that caused immense casualties between 145 and 1980", is impressed by Jackie Robinson "because baseball is shown everywhere so he received a lot bad criticism and hate", says Lyndon Johnson was known "for his ability to shove everyone out of his way", and claims that the "Warren court was anti-God they made a lot of bad and unmoral decisions". What grade does this startling oversimplification of American politics and butchering of English grammar earn Student 25? "Perfect answers! Superb. May use this as a model! 70/70. Congratulations!" Yeah, I'm sure this is preparing kids really well for the AP tests. Especially since, among fourteen papersimg, everybody got either 70/70 or 100/100 except for one 69/70 and one 99/100. |
| 16 | Apparently feeling pressured to look like he's not protecting a parodist, Special Ed blocks Buglerimg for a whole two hours! That'll teach him! Unfortunately, Bugler forgot he was supposed to be playing dead and starts blocking peopleimg after only a little more than half that time. Oopsie! |
End EZ edit section
| 26 | My Jesus is about hellfireimg, not that liberal "forgiveness" crap! |
| 33 | Sarah Palin's church was torched. The culprits have not been identified yet (there is not even proof that the fire was started deliberately, and for all anyone knows she could have done it herself to snag some sympathy [1]), but God has apparently told Conservapedia that the atheists did it!img |
| 2 | Ken to Jessica:img "It's hard to resist the sweet reasonableness of a tender hearted Conservapedian of the female persuasion. :)" Awww, shucks! Ken's pretending to be straight! Update: Ken broke the link. Updated. |
| 15 | Apparently mentioning criticism of how the Catholic church handles legal problems is now blasphemy. Been too long since we've had a good inquisition. |
| 61 | Epistemology, Assfly style:img ...more people agree that autumn foliage is beautiful than agree that 2+2=4. If you agree the latter is absolute, so is the former. More American voters agree that Obama will make a good president than agree that Dubya was a good president or agree that McCain would have made a good president. What does that mean, Andy? |
| 9 | “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” [2]img That’s what our hero TK wrote. Careful Teacake. If teh Assfly thinks you mean him he just might turn round and sting you. On second thoughts don’t worry. Assfly never sees anything worse than what teh flatterers tell him. |
- ↑ WARNING: The voting system might be under attack by neoconvicts, koo koo klansmen and/or the International Jewish Conspiracy, so take it with a grain of salt.