Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia
From RationalWiki
|
| Guides & Notes |
| Newcomer's Guide What is going on? Illustrated guide |
| Commentary |
| Active users Best of Conservapedia Blatant Plagiarism Delusions Differences with Wikipedia Hijacked Articles Refutations "SDG" Sysops Timeline CP in the News More about CP |
Conservapedia claims to differ from Wikipedia in 16 different ways. No one with an open mind would disagree that Conservapedia and Wikipedia are indeed different, but all 16 of these differences are almost completely nonexistent and/or excruciatingly frivolous. What Aschlafly is trying to do here is justify his personal blog as something important. Also, the things Conservapedia claims Wikipedia is guilty of are things that Conservapedia suffers from to a much greater degree.
[edit] Supposed Differences
- 1 - Free Reuse
- 2 - Intellectual
- 3 - Non Commercial
- 4 - Concise
- 5 - No Gossip
- 6 - Requires Authoritative Support
- 7 - No Obscenity
- 8 - Non Neutral
- 9 - No Censorship
- 10 - Allows Original Works
- 11 - Respect users' control over their own talk pages
- 12 - No Distracting templates
- 13 - Loose Regulations
- 14 - Do not drive away experts
- 15 - Only Onsite Offenses Count
- 16 - Professional Names
