User talk:67.135.49.198/Archive1

See User talk:67.135.49.198 for the current lulz.

Hi

Do a barrel roll. Norseman^Wassail! 12:46, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Mind your own business! 67.135.49.198 21:30, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Pleeeeaaaase?! Norseman^Wassail! 18:53, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Hijinx! ħuman 19:13, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Oh, like I haven't heard that one before. Der-hur! 67.135.49.198 21:30, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

I wasn't trying to be funny, I think it was a typo. Us mouthbreathers make a lot of them. Have some peanut butter and calm down. ħuman 21:54, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinxy Jinxy, My laptop cost $800 NZD My connection is $50 per month NZD My mother has no basement but my apartment costs an arm and a leg (the economy, whadda gonna do?). The cost of calling you a fagnuts - priceless. The cost of watching you make fun of someone elses typing when your fearless leader can has largely defensive weapon of gun - Priceless. Ace McWicked^Interesting 21:42, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Misunderstanding

Don't get mad at anyone else, Jinxy. It was me and me alone who altered your comment.
This isn't rocket science. Act like a seven-year-old and you'll be treated as such. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 23:15, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Warning

Please stop blanking pages. Any further wandalism will result in a block. Give yourself the day off, Jinx. Go on, you know you could do with it. Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 14:48, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Actually I don't think he's blanked anything but his mind, he's just badmouthing Al Gore in Fred Phelps At.   ^Contribs_Talk 14:51, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

RE: Paris Hilton

So Jinx, regarding this conversation:

I'm sure Hollywood doesn't need anymore attention, but if you watched the news this morning, I'm sure you caught of glimpse of her "campaign ad". o.O Natebecause people listen to what I say? 11:58, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

I wonder how many takes that took. I'd love to see the outtakes reel. Jinxmchue 12:03, 6 August 2008 (EDT) Half-way through, when the rant about hybridization of energy plans begins, it doesn't even look like her. The close-up sections are there so she can read the cards close-up, in huge, pretty text. o.O Natebecause people listen to what I say? 13:04, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, I got that impression, too. The cue card guy probably spelled out everything phonetically for her. Jinxmchue 13:11, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

lets cut through the jabbering and look at the real issue... Are you more upset because Paris Hilton is richer than you will ever be? Has more friends and adoring fans than you will ever have? Is much better looking than you could ever hope to attain in a girl or are you just pissed because she put out a better campaign ad than your candidate? and while we're on the subject, I'm in contact with a really nice practice for a possible internship in my Psychology studies, we can get you a nice bed with rest and maybe even some peanut butter if you wanna bring your dog. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 18:41, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Poke poke.... What's wrong Jinxy? too afraid to actually respond to comments when you don't hold blocking power... figures, Pansy SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 23:57, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Please don't insult pansies, they are nice flowers. Call him "effluent" instead? ħuman 00:06, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

What is this bizarre myth that Paris Hilton is attractive, Sir Chuck? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 01:21, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Hey, call me wacky, but I think she is hot. Always have. And I loved her "campaign ad". Classy move for someone who has made a few dubious ones. ħuman 01:33, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Yuch. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 01:35, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Yeah Jellyfish, I gotta disagree with you on this one... I think Paris Hilton is really hot. I'd sell your soul for a date. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 08:21, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Disturbing ^_^

But what in God's name would you talk about? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 08:49, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

(unindent) It all depends on who is introducing conversation subjects... If It were me, I would ask how she feels about all the Paris Hilton jokes, how her many businesses and other interests are going, what her plans for the future are etc... If it were her I would assume Fashion, possibly the party and club scene, small dogs... things of that nature. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 11:23, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

That's hot. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 11:25, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Indeed that is hot. By the way, I have her campaign commercial on my MySpace page. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 11:27, 19 August 2008 (EDT)#

Put it this way, Jelly - I wouldn't climb over her to get to you, although I might climb onto her!   ^Contribs_Talk 11:29, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

What an intriguing turn of phrase you have, Susan :)

You are all blind. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 11:36, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

All cats are gray in the dark!   ^Contribs_Talk 11:59, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Not true, I just had a full eye exam.... I have pilot level vision. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 11:37, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Ground level vision might be more helpful. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 11:46, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Only when searching for live bait and avoiding dog turds. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 11:51, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Do you know why conservatives hate her? It's not because of Hollywood Values, the Hilton's are a Republican family. (They donated the maximum to the McCain campaign). It's not even because of the sex tape. It's because of her FRENCH name. δλερνερ ^{διαλέγομαι | συνεισφέρω} 11:54, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

No, I think it's probably because she's a vacuous pseudo-personality ^{(Hate mail to the usual address, please)}<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 11:58, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

People in general have a very strong dislike because she's seen as a non-celebrity celebrity. People think she's never done anything to deserve her fame (despite the fact that she has a clothing line, a perfume line, a pop Cd, numerous acting roles of varying quality and other real claims) and also, I think there's a lot of jealousy for some people. She was born into a wealthy family, she's attractive and she doesn't act humble or play the modesty card.... All those things add up. and to Dlearner's comment, the best part was when the Hilton's got pissed and demanded a refund from Mccain. First rule of politics: Don't piss off your donors. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 12:02, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

None of those things earned her celebrity -- it would be more accurate to say they spent it. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 12:12, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I think she's smarter then she lets on, or at least smart enough to know which business advisers to listen to. And she completely owned McCain in that video. That's really bad. Corry^{Those are balls.} 12:19, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

According to things I've read, she's actually a very intelligent person. But I must disagree with Chaos/Jellyfish. in this country, people become celebrities for many reasons. Everything from actors to singers to political activists can become celebrities. Not to mention, in America, being a young attractive female is reason to be considered a celebrity (Tila Tequila anyone?) and as I've said from the beginning. Paris Hilton wouldn't be a celebrity if it weren't for people clamoring(sp?) to get stories on her. Anyone else remember the debacle at her reimprisonment (which I still hold to be illegal but that's another argument) it wasn't just freelance photographers and poparazzi, there were reporters and cameras from every major network in the country. Paris Hilton's merits can be argued all day, and both sides have good points, but the celebrity was caused by people following the stories and tuning in to see the saga as it unfolded. As Dennis Miller said (before he lost his mind) that after you create the monster, you can't grab a torch and join the mob to kill it. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 12:22, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I have to side with Jellyfish in that I don't find Paris Hilton very attractive or interesting. As for what she's famous for, I reckon she just plays up to a stereotype (or archetype) that people love or hate in equal measure. weaseLOId^{bite me} 13:11, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Obsession

Jizz, I'd have thought you'd have mended your ways after your grovelling apology. Your hypocritical vandalizing edits aren't even funny. Are you so stupid that you can't even raise a laugh?
2/10 - Must do better. Genghis^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 17:35, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

This from someone from a site whose constant vandalisms on CP rate in the negatives. The only thing funny about them is how you think (a) they're funny as hell, (b) they prove how superiorly "rational" you all are, and (c) they will ever be remembered by anyone. 67.135.49.198 23:51, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

You think that's us? Did it ever occur to you that CP is the laughingstock of the entire internet? We report, they decide... ħuman 01:44, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

You seem to be the only ones who ever brag about it. "Yep, that was me!" 67.135.49.198 01:45, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

People here are the only ones you've ever found, you idiot. ħuman 01:46, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Wow, that just beautifully describes how these people view "science" and "evidence." You are the only people I have seen talk about it so it must be you. Microcosm of the fundamentalist mind. tmtoulouse ^frustrate 01:48, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

(Several ECs) Besides which, the larger RW community is not responsible for anything a single member of it does without our knowledge. Although that is a standard conservative delusion. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 01:49, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Well, obviously RW is the only site that does not follow Conservapedia's point of view, therefore we must be the only ones who ever sock up there. Hell, everyone knows that every vandal is Ames. Hell, even I'm probably Ames. 74.127.239.29 01:58, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm AmesG too! And Icewedge! And Bugler! ħuman 02:03, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm tmtoulouse, and human. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 02:04, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

And I am Aschlafly. tmtoulouse ^frustrate 02:05, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I ate beans and I farted.

I'm Spartacus. NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 02:40, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm Monty Python! (And her Flying Circus!) It's... ħuman 02:41, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm Brian and so is my wife! .... How shall we fuck off O Lord? δλερνερ ^{διαλέγομαι | συνεισφέρω} 11:39, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Blanking

This talk page is not your property and removing material is frond upon. If you want your own page create an account and and you can edit the User page, but again you can't remove material from the talk page. $\approx$$\pi$ 00:45, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Next time you block for the name thing like here you might want to pull a Crocoite and change yours first, it won't look hypocritical to those who don't know better.

Next time you block for the name thing like here you might want to pull a Crocoite and change yours first, it won't look hypocritical to those who don't know better. NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 10:32, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

You're kind of stupid. Here's a clue: next time you register a sock in order to vandalize, pay attention to what the registration page asks for. 67.135.49.198 10:38, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

"Note: Offensive user names will result in that user name being blocked and perhaps the IP address being blocked. Frivolous user names, names of prominent living persons, and user names consisting of, for example, all capital letters or all the same character, may also result in that user name being blocked. User names based on your real name or initials are preferred. Also, do not create multiple accounts."

The only part the name in question arguably violates from the above is the frivolous part (then again, arguably so does yours), regardless, you're still blocking somebody for a rule you aren't following and you don't seem very interested in doing the same thing to, say, Karajou or Conservative. My point stands. NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 10:48, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

It looks like Jizzy is the stupid one (really, such a hateful personality for a professed Christian). Does he honestly think that everyone uses their "real" real name when they sign up? How do we even know his real name is Jason? It is probably Moshe or Anwar. And in central Asian countries Genghis is no more unusual than Jesus (or it's equivalent) is in Israel.  Lily ^{Ta, wack!} 11:46, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

While we're on the subject, is you full name Jason Inxmchue? Is that Incan? It's pretty narly man. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 11:48, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Holy crap, you're as dumb as a box of shit-covered rocks. "User names based on your real name or initials are preferred." Ever check out my userpage where I explain the username? Oh, and what's this you conveniently glossed over? "Real name: Real name is optional and if you choose to provide it this will be used for giving you attribution for your work." Well, gee-fricking-whiz, what ever could that be about? I guess I'm not "rational" enough to figure it out. 67.135.49.198 17:55, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

What are you jibber-jabbering about, Jinx? We're all aware of CP username policy. It was you who chose to block user GenghisK with instructions to use his real name, instructions which you yourself do not follow. How is choosing the name of the famous historical Mongol emperor significantly different to choosing a name from Dungeons & Dragons? weaseLOId^{bite me} 18:01, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx, if you were any dumber, we'd have to turn you towards the light and water you twice a week..... Do you think I haven't looked at your inane ramblings? Of course. It was an ironic hypothetical to shine light on the fact that you and your fuck buddies ban people for name violations all the time while major posters don't follow the rule. On a side note, Nice try to change the subject with the whole Real Name thing... that's not what I'm talking about.... I'm talking about this:

We do not encourage anti-intellectual editor names that are attracted to Wikipedia. For example, the Wikipedia administrator who initially deleted the entry about Conservapedia uses the name "Nearly Headless Nick." The Hartford Courant observed that another editor posted under the name "The Ostrich." These names send an inappropriate anti-intellectual message for an encyclopedia.

You fucking moron SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 22:40, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

SCB, I beg to differ. If Jinx _{hi Jinx!} was any smarter we would have to attend to the needs of a complex, photosynthesizing organism. As it is, all it probably needs is some agar (or citrate?) every few days. ħuman 23:15, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Wait, do you know even know what the words "preferred" and "optional" means? If anything, that gives strenght to my argument. And just like the weasel said you're still not following the instructions you gave or even gave the blocked user the chance to state his real name (specially considering editing his userpage right away would constitute a 90/10 violation) like you did which supposedly makes everything OK. By the way, various sysops aren't even complying with this made-up-on-the-spot distinction that apparently only you care about, so, when are you going to block them?

But hey, it's never too late to imitate a moron; Holy fucking shit, you're even a bigger dimwit that I could've ever imagined, apparently I the "irrational one" must be the one to explain you, the almighty conservatives, about the rules of their own site. What a bunch of hypocritical mouthbreathers. NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 05:29, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

NF, I don't know why you thought asking Jinx to explain his reasoning (for anything) was a good idea ^_^

Also, this section title is immense. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 05:35, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Hey, why not make it even longer? NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 05:44, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

<-Unindent> I notice that Jizzshoes gets to explain his CP user name on his talk page (funny I didn't see that escape clause in the commandments) whereas GenghisK got blocked without even having made an edit. Of course "GenghisK" as a user name fully complies with the Conservedpia standards - first name and last initial. So who is a numbnuts blocker (I won't call him an editor as he has made virtually no substantial edits to the CP project) to say whether a user's name is real or not? Here in Kazakhstan (what no checkuser, Jizz?), Genghis is not an uncommon name and K is one of the commonest initials for a surname. (BTW it doesn't stand for Khan or Khant). Of course Jizz's real stupidity is that he blocks someone whose identity he does know and tells them to create an account with a name he doesn't know. Surely it is easier to keep tabs on someone when they are in the open rather then forcing them to go underground. Did you really think I created an account with the name everyone knows me by in order to vandalize? Doh, how clever you are! It was also interesting to note that Jizz ignored all the names which were also created around the same time and didn't fit the first name last initial and picked the only one which did - GenghisK. Why? Because he's just a small-minded, vindictive little punk, who got so upset that he was called a hypocrite over his name blocks that he posted replies on WIGO, my talk page and my amazingly inactive blog. Pathetic. Genghis^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 13:08, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Aw, you poor, poor widdle baby. Here - I'll play a tiny little violin for you. Now run along and play a nice game of hide and go fuck yourself. 67.135.49.198 20:18, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

"User names based on your real name or initials are preferred." "Real name: Real name is optional and if you choose to provide it this will be used for giving you attribution for your work."

What part of that don't you gas-emitting baboon-butts not understand? 67.135.49.198 20:26, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

Oh, quick! Criticize my grammar! That'll make your arguments far more valid! 67.135.49.198 20:27, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

BUT THE POINT IS THAT YOU BLOCK PEOPLE FOR NOT USING THEIR REAL NAMES ALL THE TIME. ---λινυσ^(☮) 20:40, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

(EC) That would be the part where you interpret it to read "Real names are mandatory when I feel like it and also I can read your mind". Like most of your posts, I could rebut this just by quoting previous comments that you haven't read -- in particular, read NightFlare's explanation of why you are educationally subnormal. It is most enlightening ^_^ <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 20:43, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

Ah, Jinx Jinx Jinx.... You remind why I got into the sport in the first place... You're either really really stupid or you're intentionally trying to change the focus... I've already laid this out for you, but I guess your dog was busy and you lost track of the posting... so to help with your horrible reading comprehension (something that even my middle and high school students need to pass their CSAP tests) I'll repost the issue, and I'll do it slowly so you can understand:

WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE TEXT ON THE USER CREATION SCREEN YOU IDIOT. We are talking about this clip from the Conservapedia commandments:

We do not encourage anti-intellectual editor names that are attracted to Wikipedia. For example, the Wikipedia administrator who initially deleted the entry about Conservapedia uses the name "Nearly Headless Nick." The Hartford Courant observed that another editor posted under the name "The Ostrich." These names send an inappropriate anti-intellectual message for an encyclopedia.

Between this and the huge block log of people banned with the comment "use your real name," your hypocrisy in handing out blocks is incredible. For whatever reason, You, Ken, Bugler and others get to keep using their anonymous psedonyms while everyone else is told to pick a real name... Do you get it now? Do you? I doubt it. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 20:44, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

From teh WP:

A Jinx _{hi Jinx!} A jinx, in popular superstition and folklore, is:

• A sort of curse placed on a person that makes them prey to large numbers of minor misfortunes and other forms of bad luck;
• A person afflicted with a similar curse, who, while not directly subject to a series of misfortunes, seems to attract them to anyone in his general area.
• An object or animal that brings bad luck.
• A common slang term used when two people say the same thing at the same time (said as a game amongst the young and young hearted which suggests some kind of spooky supernatural interference).

The first three are obvious, the last one applies here because we all say pretty much the same thing. --δλερνερ ^{διαλέγομαι | συνεισφέρω} 21:38, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

How does it feel?

You are tougher than DeanS, are you?, with that block. "Actions have consequences", sure, but also "you will be judged by your actions". Think about it. (Editor at) CP:^{no intelligence allowed} 14:50, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

I guess he means the peons, i.e. editors without blocking powers have consequences for their actions, since he literally posted under discussion about abusive sysops. That's either severe tunnel vision, or he deliberately wanted irony meters to... er... (oh whats that phrase when the little pointer goes back and forth in a rapid, out-of-control way?) Norseman^Wassail! 15:02, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

Spasm? By the way, greeting my friend of possibly Incan heritage. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 15:08, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

What in the hell are you talking about, Liar at RP? You make absolutely no sense. Where did you get the idea that I think I'm "tougher than DeanS?" Probably where you and everyone else here gets all their ideas: the same body cavity where you keep your heads. 67.135.49.198 00:08, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

You're funny. Not in a "laughing with you" way, sadly... ħuman 00:19, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I can honestly say I've never laughed at anything here other than the extreme stupidity you all have in spades and constantly put on display. I'd say you should be embarrassed, but you're all too stupid to be embarrassed. 67.135.49.198 00:38, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Does that mean you are too embarrassed to be stupid? ħuman 00:40, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Do you even think before you post? No, obviously not, otherwise your posts would make sense. 67.135.49.198 00:41, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Do you ever post sober? $\approx$$\pi$ 00:45, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx, not Human we have already been over that one. $\approx$$\pi$ 00:46, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Back to the question that "Liar at RP" (still chuckle at that one) asked, I believe I can clarify (correct me if I'm wrong, Ed at CP). There is currently discussion over the abuse of power of DeanS, and yet, rather than learn from this discussion, you, Jinx _{hi Jinx!}, demonstrate a similar abuse of power. If that weren't enough, you add an ironic statement of actions having consequences, while missing (or ignoring) the obvious consequences of both your and DeanS actions. I hope that helps. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:51, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks Arcan for clarifying it. Editor at CP:^{Liar at RW} 05:33, 27 August 2008 (EDT) Liar at RW^{(Ed at CP)} 05:34, 27 August 2008 (EDT), no I mean: Liar at RP^{(Ed at CP)} 06:19, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I hate it when people lie to me in my RP games. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:39, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Wow, they're I'm really obsessed with me

How many people have created accounts referencing me? Quite a few, it seems. At least 3, to my recollection, including today's "Lowjinx." Jinxmchue 00:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT) _{copied from Cp:User talk:DeanS}

Flatter yourself not oh Jinx of litle brain. _{(Hi Jinx!)} While ever the fish bites, we'll keep dropping bait in the sewage pond that is Conservapedia.   ^Contribs_Talk 00:49, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

That is me. I have earned 52 for baiting the Jinx into my territory. $\approx$$\pi$ 00:51, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

And shouldn't all mittel klass white Americans be abed with their mittel klass white American wifelets by this time so that they'll be able to rise early for family prayers?   ^Contribs_Talk 00:58, 27 August 2008 (EDT) And roll on Judgement day

Stop baiting him back to neutral territory I have almost got him to Schukky. Hey Jinx _{hi Jinx!} along with my ads on Main Page talk see if you can find my sleeper account I use for emailing people the address here. It makes on average 2 or 3 edits a week. $\approx$$\pi$ 01:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Which one of us will rename this "jinxmchue" imposter? I will if no one else will... ħuman 01:06, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I can haz the powers to do tis? $\approx$$\pi$ 01:06, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Pardon?   ^Contribs_Talk 01:09, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I sez, can you Bureaucrat me? $\approx$$\pi$ 01:14, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

All in one week? Well, it is the week of the blunt promotions... I dunno... Susan? Your turn. ħuman 01:23, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

(unindent) My turn to try for the steal (representing Black Rationalwiki) Jinx, my Incan friend (Aztec maybe? I apologise if I mislabeled your heritage). I would like to tell you from all of us Negros.... You are a fucking moron and I thank you for continuing to dance for us here at Rationalwiki. When faced with a long, hard day of actually educating your people (unlike Andy) I sometimes become discouraged at the low wages, long hours, and awful pay. But then I read your idiotic attacks and not so subtle attempts at humor and I smile, because deep inside my heart, I know that I have some sense of reality, irony and humor. You, on the other hand, issue your blocks from on high, knowing that you and your Sysop ilk are protected from any retaliation for your abuse and you make your cute little edit comments and come over here to spew forth your insane ramblings. When all is said and done, I know that I (and my Rational friends) shall win because, at the end of the day, you will never reach success and you will never have sex without forking over at least two weeks pay. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 01:30, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx _{hi Jinx!} if you come back over here I will smear myself in peanut butter. $\approx$$\pi$ 01:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

lol! "My sleeper account." Yeah, right. Not a single one of you is clever enough to retain a mole/"sleeper account" for more than a few hours. 67.135.49.198 16:31, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I have dozens, you moron. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 16:33, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, explain MexMax and Samwell you fucking idiot. SirChuckB^{A product of Affirmative Action} 20:08, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

How about JJacob you nitwit? Not only that but I still have an account at conservapedia. Ace McWicked^whisky 20:13, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Yeah I mean I am so stupid that I can't manage to not post. $\approx$$\pi$ 20:18, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

I confess: I'm not obsessed, but I'm addicted. Could you please give us mere mortals more Laws and Variations? Liar at RP^{(Ed at CP)} 20:25, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Explain them? You probably claimed them after the fact. It's not like you can prove it. 67.135.49.198 22:25, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Dozens. Sure you do. Name some. With "dozens," you can spare a few. 67.135.49.198 22:25, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

We've had this conversation before, Jinxy. My socks are (much) more important than you. It's basic math ^_^ <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 22:29, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

D'you know, I have to keep reminding myself that Jinx _{(Hi Jinx!)} isn't a twelve year old boy - this guy's in his thirties with a wife & 2. 5 kids! How he managed to remember to breathe for so many years is quite baffling, let alone find some poor female to share his fascist existence with and have unprotected sexual congress with is quite mindblowing.   ^Contribs_Talk 20:29, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinxmoron: a compelling case for contraception?

^{Ads by Google}

<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Horseshoe-shaped gonads!} 22:32, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi Susan, thanks bureaucrating me. I have the same problem with Ken. They both behave as though they are at most 15 (17 if they are ICP fans). I have three theories 1) the are either both extremely deep cover socks by two patient but still juvenile 14 year olds (the patient bit is the problem so unlikely), 2) they are 15 year old conservative children who imagine what they would be like when they are not living with mum and dad and how cool it would be and create there on screen persona accordingly, 3) they are both the most grown-ass kids on earths and even though they are in their 30s they still can't get past all that happened in high school because they stayed in their little towns and got jobs straight out of school which they still have. $\approx$$\pi$ 22:40, 27 August 2008 (EDT)