User talk:Weaseloid

   

- ARCHIVES -
1 (mostly boring) 2 (mostly arguments)
   

   

Some probably unwanted information

If you stick {{talkpage}} @ the top of the page it'll auto link & enable easier creation of Rkives. Toast 22:22, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks, but I prefer doing it manually. At least until it gets unmanageable. wassaiLOId~ 10:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)

I kinda like organising my archives into a trapezium of irritating yellow smileys. At least today I do. I shall probably get sick of it before long. wassaiLOId~ 11:24, 26 December 2008 (EST)

Now what did you do to break this pretty page? ħuman 22:47, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Oh, I see. Someone wrecked "image:slap.gif". That was mean. ħuman 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Because

I have no idea how to unblock my self. I only can do a certain amount of operations on myself at a time and this (unblocking) was not one of them. So thank you for doing it for me. Unblocking that is. Carptrash 15:02, 26 December 2008 (EST)

Go to the block log, find where you were last blocked, and click the "unblock" link at the end of the entry. --Kels 15:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)

Or just go as if to block somebody else & then change it to your name in the block field; then choose "unblock" (bottom right on the screen).

So what was with blocking CPAdmin1? wassaiLOId~ 15:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)

Probably some joke blocking on Xmas eve, I know I did whoever was active because I was bored. Might have been someone else though, I didn't check. --Kels 15:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)

the blocking of the admin was me because it appeared to be the only edit that I could make. So I did it, as Edmund Hillary once said, "Because it is there." Carptrash 15:24, 26 December 2008 (EST)

This does not mean I'll remember it next time (hopefully there will be no next time) but thanks for getting me there this time. No, not THERE, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... to the unblocking place. Carptrash 15:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)

Err, you're welcome. Lol. wassaiLOId~ 15:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)

TK

Why did you take this out? Proxima Centauri 02:54, 29 December 2008 (EST)

It may be because it wasn't really necessary, or that there were better ways of supplying the information. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:31, 29 December 2008 (EST)

I note that you referenced a static version of the page, one with your section on it. If you had linked to the diff link, it would be patently obvious why he removed it—he said why he removed it right in the edit summary. You should check the relevant edit history before whinging. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:34, 29 December 2008 (EST)

It seems a bit messy & unnecessary to link to a person's contributions & block log just so that users can see their latest edits, since everyone who is interested would already know how to find that. If you must do it, a smart way would be in some kind of template to go on each sysop's article (like the "stalkbox" at RWW). Anyway, I'd already linked to TK's block log in the IP range blocks section, to make a point about him blocking user's IPs. The contributions just didn't really seem necessary. wassaiLOId~ 08:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

Here's what I've done for you instead. wassaiLOId~ 09:56, 29 December 2008 (EST)

"Also known as..."

So you're me now? TheoryOfPractice 20:45, 1 January 2009 (EST)

That's the rumour. Deny it all you like, but I think history will be the judge. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:02, 1 January 2009 (EST)

Yes, but I am teh mustelid! ħuman 22:46, 1 January 2009 (EST)

I thought you were the Walrus. ("I was the Walrus. Paul wasn't the Walrus. I was just saying that to be nice but I was actually the Walrus...") TheoryOfPractice 22:56, 1 January 2009 (EST)

In memory of the Weasel incident

check my sig --"ConservapediaUndergroundResistor^{feline fanatic} 21:23, 3 January 2009 (EST)

I already did. Have you noticed mine? :-D

Actually I was going to say about the signature: you need to move the option stuff to a subpage (or even all of the signature). 'Cause at the moment, eight or nine lines of code get copied whenever you sign. (See above, when you go to add a comment, & you'll see what I mean). It makes it awkward for people editing after you. But if you move some or all of it to a separate template, & put that template into your signature page, it will make what appears on the editing screen a lot shorter while the actual signature still looks the same. See RationalWiki:Help/wikisig for help, or ask me if you're still not sure how to do it. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:32, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Yeah, CUR, your current version is clumsy. It also invites random editing to "improve" it, don't tempt us. PS, the giant font bugs me, but probably no-one else cares. ħuman 21:48, 3 January 2009 (EST)

It actually looks OK to me, but I'm guessing this is another case where you need Vista or similar to see the correct font. If you're just seeing it in arial, I guess it's pretty big. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:58, 3 January 2009 (EST)

It's bradly hand ITC. Human, you must be using a really old computer. --"ConservapediaUndergroundResistor^{feline fanatic} 22:01, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Do you want me to fix your signature code on a subpage for you? I was about to write instructions how you can do it, but it would be quicker & simpler if I just went ahead, & then you can see what I've done. But it feels a bit wrong tinkering with somebody else's signature & pagemoving it without permission first. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 22:22, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks, but I managed to figure it out. I think. --"ConservapediaUndergroundResistor"^{is Rodney McKay} 22:24, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Yeah, looks like you've got it. Cool. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 22:26, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Nah, it's the "font size=4" part that sucks, not my OS or browser. PS, when writing for the web, you always need to be sure the "default" version works. Yours doesn't. ħuman 22:42, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Look at it now! --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 11:02, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Community Standards

In an effort to update our sometimes too-vague and too-often ignored current Community Standards, I drafted a possible update of them. The draft can be found here. I invite you, and the rest of the site, to discuss this important issue. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 04:39, 9 January 2009 (EST)

By the way

You're a bureaucrat now. Now go crazy and make some sysops! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:48, 10 January 2009 (EST)

Woohoo! Thanks RA. I will try to remain gosh-darned reasonable. :-D ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:51, 10 January 2009 (EST)

Support or oppose the Science namespace

Weaseloid. After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to call the matter to question. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page. I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote. No, this isn't a form letter. :-) Omniwombat 19:21, 11 January 2009 (EST)

I'm a bit hesitant to vote because, firstly, I'm not much of a science guy anyway so I would barely be involved in any of it, and secondly, I don't really mind if science is dealt with as a separate namespace or if we just ammend the mission statements slightly to include science/math articles in mainspace. I just think we need to work something out, because at the moment there are sciencey or mathematical articles in mainspace which are nothing to do with the missions, but I don't know whether I should be flagging them as non-mission or just ignoring them. However, I don't want to be the casting vote as to whether the science namespace goes ahead or not when I have no strong feeling either way. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:37, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Babble

Vou vare veing vinvited vo ve vy veputy vof ve vabal. Things this will allow vou to vo: 1. Valk vith va Vansylvanian vaccent. 2. Vinsert vequest vere. Vif vou vell vanyone vabout ve vabal, vou vare in vig vouble. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:13, 11 January 2009 (EST)

but the answer is ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:22, 11 January 2009 (EST)

So you decided to keep your cabal secret by posting it where everyone can see? - User $\pi$ 20:24, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Vaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. . . Vo ve vave vother vontenders? And the cabal is secret. It's existance is not. I won't tell anyone vhat Vi van voing. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:25, 11 January 2009 (EST)

You know in order for your "vabal" to exist you are going to have to get someone other than yourself to join? - User $\pi$ 20:30, 11 January 2009 (EST)

What about you? --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:31, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Pi--><--CUR - User $\pi$ 20:34, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Cabal--><-Pi

'Nuff said. Take it or leave it. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:38, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Have you ever had an original joke? - User $\pi$ 20:39, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Vhat's the difference between a duck? Now that's original. (Note: saying it was original was original) Also, you should here me make snarky remarks about politics. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:42, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Go on then - make a snarky remark about politics. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:43, 11 January 2009 (EST)

I need an odd news story first. Perferably one involving Sarah Palin or her ilk. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:44, 11 January 2009 (EST)

It sounds like you are planning to wheel out a done to death joke. - User $\pi$ 20:46, 11 January 2009 (EST)

How about this: The reason Palin is going to run in 2012 is because the world will have ended, and only the '[Andrew Schlafly|real, God-fearing Americans]' will be left, and they will vote for her. Despite sexism. Because it's a liberal word and doesn't exist. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:48, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Congratulations! For that you have earned yourself one of my big question marks. ?- User $\pi$ 20:50, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Va vabal vas a vense of vumor. Vou von't --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:52, 11 January 2009 (EST)

After reading this exchange, I must say I feel a bit insulted by the comparison you made a few days ago, Π. The electrocutioner 20:53, 11 January 2009 (EST)

I apologise whole heartedly, now I realise how great of a slight that was. - User $\pi$ 20:56, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Please provide a link to the comparision. What was the comparison? --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 20:55, 11 January 2009 (EST)

You are a needy little person aren't you? - User $\pi$ 20:56, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Congratulations Weaseloid. You are now part of the cabal whether you like it or not. You now get to valk vith va Vansylvanian vaccent. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 14:16, 12 January 2009 (EST)

First job for the cabal: Make a special cabal intercom group. This way, we can plan in top secret. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 17:24, 12 January 2009 (EST)

No thanks, not interested. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:28, 12 January 2009 (EST)

You are part of the cabal, like it or not, unless you can find someone who is more willing. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 17:30, 12 January 2009 (EST)

No, I'm not part of yours or any cabal, & it isn't my problem if you can't recruit anyone to play cabals with you. I'm working on something at the moment, so please leave me alone for a while. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:37, 12 January 2009 (EST)

names thing

Actually keep the old names where they are, but the actual name in the "". 216.221.87.112 21:28, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I don't follow what you mean. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:29, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Chalkboard‎

Sorry I didn't update the community chalkboard right away, my supervisor came in to talk to me about something. - User $\pi$ 21:27, 14 January 2009 (EST)

That's OK, I straightened it out. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:33, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Goatmix/cat

That was me, not signing in. It did seem to disturb my cat. Corry^{It is a rock, though. Should beat everything.} 16:40, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Hey. I figured it was probably a regular who hadn't signed in rather than a newbie. What did the cat actually do in response to the goat chorus? ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 16:49, 16 January 2009 (EST)

She was laying around, and when the goats started she was all of a sudden standing on top of her litterbox and making a weird whiny noise. I really can't blame her. Corry^{It is a rock, though. Should beat everything.} 17:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)

It's a shame. Goats & cats can be good buddies. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:04, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Block

How dare you interfere with my self imposed exile! POWER! UNLIMITED POWER!^{You paid the price for your lack of vision} 16:24, 20 January 2009 (EST)(four, just for human)

I dare do lots of interfering. Such is a weasel's wont. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 16:33, 20 January 2009 (EST)

No hard feelings about the block. I had to exile myself for at least some time POWER! UNLIMITED POWER!^{You paid the price for your lack of vision} 16:39, 20 January 2009 (EST)

No worries. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 16:54, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Therians

Please stop you're anti-therian diatribe. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 21:05, 22 January 2009 (EST)

What specifically? ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:06, 22 January 2009 (EST)

• Claiming we are wingnuts.
• Claiming we can't be rational.
• I'll think of some more later.

--"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 21:08, 22 January 2009 (EST)

• Not guilty.
• I haven't said anybody can't be rational, but I haven't seen a rational explanation for the concept.
• I'm entitled to my opinions & to express them.

ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:11, 22 January 2009 (EST)

• You sure didn't do anything.
• The lack of a rational explanation does not mean it is irrational.
• You most certainly are, but you should be more polite.

--"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 21:13, 22 January 2009 (EST)

By the way, when are you going to debate me on the werelist? All ye has to do is register. I'm called cheetah. Look me up. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 21:14, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Please, please register. Believe me, more people there will be able to give rational explanations. I found out what I was about a month ago. As such, I'm doing pretty well defending my position, but I think if you debated me on therian turf, it might be more even. Or, we could meet in neutral territory- say, Wikipedia. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistor^{is Rodney McKay} 21:21, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Apart from the fact that WP does not exist to host "debates", you might not find them "neutral" enough for your purposes:

"Therian in the English language has two distinct definitions:

• In taxonomy, the term refers to a member of the Mammalia subclass Theria, consisting of marsupial and placental mammals.

• A therian may also be a member of the contemporary subculture of therianthropy, which is based on a spiritual and/or psychological identification with animals."

ħuman 21:43, 22 January 2009 (EST)

CUR, how many pages are you going to DOMIfuckingNATE. For christ's sake, most of us (I think) here are barely tolerating you & your infantile weirdness. Please keep your wingnuttery to one page, preferably on another site.  ^(Toast) _{and marmalade} 21:49, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Afterthought: get your parents to take you to a therapist  ^(Toast) _{and marmalade} 21:53, 22 January 2009 (EST)