User talk:Tweety

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Tweety! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

I've moved JacobB to Conservapedia:Sysops/JacobB 'cause that's where it lives.   ^Contribs_Talk 15:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

I tawt I taw a sysop!!!

I did! I did taw a sysop! Congrats, you are now a sysop. Here is your mop and bucket. The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 17:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

Funny, but sorry, I had to revert that. You're 100% correct though, Human is one piece of sexy pie. SJ ^Debaser 22:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

You are trying too hard

That is all. - π 22:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, could you elaborate? If I'm appearing ott with humour or something, it's because I've been an uncyclopedia editor for about a year, I'm stuck with the style Tweety (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

no its because you cant mind your own business. Waronstupidity (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I changed your insult because I genuinely believe that an online community must work together for the good of the whole. Tweety (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

and your right that why i changed it. I WAS PISSED yesterday and forgot to erase it.Waronstupidity (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

(EC)No you are not even funny, but that is beside the point. You throw the word n00b around like you just learnt it, but don't know what it means. (How did you survive at uncyclopedia?) Then there is you comments on WIGO CP talk, which reek of trying to fit in. Just be yourself and stop trying acting the way you think will impress press people, just be yourself. Unless this is yourself, in which case imitate a less annoying person. - π 23:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Allow me to explain. The use of the word n00b etc, is me parodying internet culture at uncyclopedia, something which I have had great success with over there. If you don't like or get my humour then fine, but please don't accuse me of trying to fit in. I've been a long term reader of this site and decided to bring across my persona from uncyclopedia. I have shown the 'real me', when attempting to remove abuse etc. It's a shame if you don't like how I roll, but that's life. You n00b. :p Tweety (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Cool, whatever. Stay with in the guidelines and you are alright with me, i.e, don't edit others users' userpages. - π 23:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Why did you erase 19,000 characters of WIGO-world?

...when erasing none is the only smart thing to do? You don't like a WIGO, vote it down. Erasing all of them is a little petulant. P-Foster (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

TK

Don't unblock TK. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 19:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Word. P-Foster (talk) 19:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

w

I've demoted you to normal. Unblocking TK on a whim is just a bit too disruptive for my liking, considering he was blocked after days of consensus-forming.

This isn't a big deal. If you're not remade a sysop in the next 24 hours I will be very surprised. Mei (talk) 20:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, since nobody can make a friggin' decision around this place without it getting undone 10 minutes later. --Kels (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

We need a name for that. How about 'undoism'? For example: 'This fiasco with TK has been plagued by undoism from the start'. Mei (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Maybe unblocking him for a lol was too far, but it's far more amusing to watch his self destruction Tweety (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree, but I find it fine to watch him destroy himself on CP. Here he seems to upset people. Mei (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Strongly agree with Mei and Kels. It was way too disruptive having TK here and all the controversy and dissent he caused. I don't think that anyone should unblock him without prior discussion and consensus. Refugee^{talk page} 20:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree with all the agreement around here. That is all. SJ ^Debaser 20:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblocking TK was fucking stupid. Demoting this clown again will be stupid also. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 20:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I did propose a formal solution to this here.--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 20:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Bob is always so reasonable. :-) Refugee^{talk page} 20:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

EC) Yeah, but as a LJ member I can't call on the LJ. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 20:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Neither can I. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The LJ isn't necessary for something as minute as this, it was just a relatively new editor being a bit silly. Let's just leave the rabscallion as a normal editor for a couple a week or so instead of making a mountain out of a molehill, shall we? SJ ^Debaser 20:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

pretty smart for a fuckin' N00B, Josh. P-Foster (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I feel my social standing with the wiki has risen by 2% in the last quarter. So far, that puts me at 2%. SJ ^Debaser 20:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I never thought Superjosh was a n00b. He is serious in all the right places. Mei (talk) 20:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I think the solution here is to stop encouraging people to pull stunts like that in general. It's gotten tiresome, especially given the size of the wiki now. It's just a matter of communicating that dudes, that shit ain't cool no mo'. It's more a matter of what the culture is cool with than anything to do with rules and formal bodies. (also, Josh is smart because he's super, isn't that obvious?) --Kels (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Think PF meant Tweety was pretty smert. I'd been wondering myself: sleeper? Night all. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 20:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I like Kels. I wish Kels had a newsletter. Mei (talk) 20:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)