User talk:Arthropleura

Events in Archive 1: My entrance, the rusty-spotted cat debacle, my promotion to sysopship, the 'Weasel Incident (timeless lulz), the Great Month of the Wikisig, the Great Server Move Journey (the server move), the Rodney Controversy, the Turbobanners, and me telling Toast to eat some toast.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>

, (new)

Moron

I use Tor; think you can block me? I'll put far worse in your sig... Fall down

I most certainly do. Bye, bye, Fall Down. P.S. I can also protect it. Looks like you're the moron here, not me. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 18:32, 15 January 2009 (EST)

But I'm funnier. You wouldn't know humor if it grabbed you by the nuts, would you? Fall down

FYI.

It's a shame...I liked that guy. TheoryOfPractice 20:01, 15 January 2009 (EST)

What does that have to do with me? --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 20:14, 15 January 2009 (EST)

It's not just about the pictures...

....it's your attitude. You're edit-warring, and you're edit-warring with someone like Human, who is one of the most active, senior, and valued contributors to this community. One person already quit the site today in part because of an argument with you. Your behaviour re: two stupid pictures from some television show is not only contrary to the standards, it's making this place less fun. TheoryOfPractice 21:01, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I realize that. However:

1. If someone can't take someone else arguing with them, they aren't suited for RW. Being here has schooled me in that repeatedly. 2. If the people who Sci-Fi saw the picture, they'd be thrilled. Why? I'm using it to promote their work. 3. Just become someone is valued doesn't mean that they should get away with some of the insults Human gets away with. I get sick of being flamed. He's called me every insult imaginable. I've been curt, but not rude- like I have been treated by most people here. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 21:07, 15 January 2009 (EST)

1. Edit warring is not arguing. it's being childish and churlish. 2. You can read the minds of people like copyright lawyers? That's quite the talent. 3. You've earned every word of it. TheoryOfPractice 21:09, 15 January 2009 (EST)

1. He also edit warred. Therefore, he is childish and churlish.

2. Common sense. And I'm trying to get permission.

3. No I haven't. And even if I had, that's no excuse for flaming.

--"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 21:12, 15 January 2009 (EST)

1. No, he (and I and others) were reverting your blatant violations of site policy/consensus. 2. Common sense has nothing to do with copyright law. 3. i disagree, but whatever. TheoryOfPractice 21:14, 15 January 2009 (EST)

1. I admit you have a point there.

2. Common sense has to do with everything.

3. Flaming is illegal. And the kind of insults he was making are against site policy.

--"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 21:16, 15 January 2009 (EST)

You're not going to get permission. Why? Because they won't gain anything from you having those two pics on your userpage, but giving you a permission is a precedent and a risk. That's how copyright works, if it's not worth the effort, better to just forbid than face unexpected consequences later. -- Nx ^talk 21:20, 15 January 2009 (EST)

(EC) Common sense means nothing. YOU might think that it's good for whatever-teevee-network -it-is-that-makes-that-stupid-show to use their property that way, and maybe you're right, but it doesn't matter. Copyright law and Fair Use say otherwise. It's not your image to make that decision with. As for the attacks on you, they may be against site policy; but having read this site nearly every day for 18 months now (even during those periods when I had taken my bat and ball and gone home) I've never seen anyone cause so many stupid arguments and create as much grief as you have, except maybe TK. If you're getting flamed, it could very well be because because you're ticking people off--people who've shown themselves to be remarkably tolerant of a lot of shit in the past. TheoryOfPractice 21:22, 15 January 2009 (EST)

(2nd EC) Doesn't matter. Ticking people off is no excuse. And just because they've been tolerant in the past doesn't mean that they should get away with this. Otherwise, people could get away with murder because 'they hadn't killed anyone, even when they were really annoying.' Also, we need to be strict when it comes to personal attacks. But back on topic, I may well get permission. If I do, I will reinstate the userbox. No sooner, no later. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 21:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

My two bits

You are perpetually in a cycle of being obnoxious and then getting angry when people call you out for it. And don't edit war with people about copyright. Copyright lawyers are tantamount to the Nazgul. If somebody takes something down for copyright reasons, you should discuss it with them instead of restoring it. And after said discussion, be prepared to admit that you might not be in the right. You need to lay back, guy. You're being very un-Dude. If you keep it up, people will just start to assume that you're a troll and ignore you. Corry^{Mom signed me up for the army, just because the fat man dared her to.} 21:24, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Fine. But can people please stop flaming me whenever I do the least little thing that they don't like? Hint: That's not a question. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 21:34, 15 January 2009 (EST)

You know when people break up with you and say "It's not you, it's me"? Sometimes they're lying about that part. TheoryOfPractice 21:38, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I'll be honest, CUR, I was on your side to start off, and while I thought the cat article needed more goat, I was cool with that. But there's been a pattern of behaviour that's not impressed me in the least, especially when you apparently get bored and start poking things because you want a "debate", which you seem to define as "argument". I really started to notice when you poked Fall Down, despite everyone else telling you not to, and the reasons for not poking him already spelled out if you'd bothered to look. The furry article was another example, but there's been lots, some of which I've been present for and some of which I haven't. At this point, I consider you mildly trollish, even if it's not deliberate. --Kels 21:42, 15 January 2009 (EST)

For example, you have this tendency to get in dustups with people and then prolifically brag. I am saying this because I noticed for the first time that you have a sig line that says "the mortal enemy of all things Human." It appears that you intentionally start arguments and then brag about them in order to make you look more important. This may very well be unintentional, but it's annoying all the same. That's all- I'm not going to start piling on. Corry^{Mom signed me up for the army, just because the fat man dared her to.} 22:06, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I was actually making fun of myself. Look. I've been trying to shape up. It may take some time. In the meantime, please stop flaming me. It makes being civil a lot harder. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 10:33, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Hmmm you know I wonder...

You are not by any chance TK are you? Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 23:35, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I mean no offence but after reviewing all fators etc one must ask, ya know? Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 23:41, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Nah, TK's IQ is easily 160. ħuman 23:45, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Still, after looking at contributions, arguments, sowing discontent among other editors etc the question needs to be asked. Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 23:47, 15 January 2009 (EST)

The question you have to ask yourself is does TK have so little dignity that he would behave like CUR? - User $\pi$ 03:51, 16 January 2009 (EST)

One should put nothing past TK. In fact I think RA is TK also. har har ho ho ho. Oh ye of little respect/prominence. Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 05:48, 16 January 2009 (EST)

I'm not dumb enought to be TK. I'm not conservative enough to be TK. I don't abuse my abilities enough to be TK. I'm not TK. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 10:39, 16 January 2009 (EST)

"Not dumb enough to be TK" TK is a genius when it comes to destroying communities. How many people can you think of who would be able to regain sysopship on CP after the SDG incident? Phantom Hoover 12:36, 16 January 2009 (EST)

I meant smart as in good at math or other thought proccesses, not good at destroying communities. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 17:47, 16 January 2009 (EST)

What evidence have you ever given that you are smarter than TK? He is a computer consultant. Phantom Hoover 17:51, 16 January 2009 (EST)

He fooled me. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 17:52, 16 January 2009 (EST)

The L.A. Times article. Phantom Hoover 17:56, 16 January 2009 (EST)

TK's not that conservative, check where he falls on RationalWIki Moral Matrix. He just pretends to be a die hard Christian conservative to lull Andy into a false sense of security. Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 12:43, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Hey

Stop being a dick. Thanks.--Tom Moore^{fiat justitia ruat coelum} 23:46, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Alarm clock is ringing

Who the Hell are you talking to? Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:02, 16 January 2009 (EST)

All of thy who vare veing idel. I.E: mostly myself. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 19:06, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Indeed. Best to only use the intercom if you actually have something to say to other people; not just because you're bored. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:09, 16 January 2009 (EST)

If you are bored how about you set about improving articles in this list instead hoping people will talk to you. - User $\pi$ 19:44, 16 January 2009 (EST)

We actual have a page on this. - User $\pi$ 19:46, 16 January 2009 (EST)

For Christ's sake...

When someone goes around fixing your spelling mistakes, reverting those corrections is no way to make friends. TheoryOfPractice 18:43, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Unfortunately, teh Weasel also deleted the Sci-Fi specials --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 18:44, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Because they're baffling, unfunny & of interest only to yourself. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:47, 17 January 2009 (EST)

They are fairly easy to understand. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 18:48, 17 January 2009 (EST)

But don't make a lot of sense against the rest of it. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:49, 17 January 2009 (EST)

They are puns. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 18:50, 17 January 2009 (EST)

....aaaaand I had to make the same correction again. For the third time. What the hell is wrong with you? TheoryOfPractice 10:12, 18 January 2009 (EST)

Learn to spell...

Why does your stupid menu item on the saloon page still have a typo? Why do you have so little respect for others' contributions that you insist on reverting their corrections to your mistakes? Why do i now need to correct you for a fourth time? TheoryOfPractice 14:39, 20 January 2009 (EST)

I'm leaving it alone. Must be someone else. Maybe FD. I threatened him. This might be his revenge. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 14:41, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Vandal?

Why did you call me a vandal? That's one of my favorite songs, I was just correcting someone on the lyrics. 16:06, 20 January 2009 (EST)

You deleted a whole swath of talk page comments. --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 16:07, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Hey emporor, the lyrics are in LATIN! Any English version is a translation, subject to the translators whims.Z3ro 16:08, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Fine, I'll back down. 16:09, 20 January 2009 (EST)

What is the deal

Regarding this and this, Who do you think you are? Since you've come here you've been difficult and confrontational over everything and now you have the nerve to revert other's comments and insult them on user pages? This is an official warning from someone who usually likes to play it cool: Back off and stop acting like a jackass or we're gonna have problems. SirChuckB^{DMorris for new Jinx!} 22:54, 20 January 2009 (EST)