Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Conservative"
m (I thought it was funny enough, although PAA) |
Kristymartin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Ken-buggy.jpg|thumb|400px|right|''The Buffalo News'', July 2008]] | [[Image:Ken-buggy.jpg|thumb|400px|right|''The Buffalo News'', July 2008]] | ||
[[File:Flying Fortress.png|thumb|right|275px|RationalWiki has been able to obtain Ken's plans for Operation Flying Fortress.]] | [[File:Flying Fortress.png|thumb|right|275px|RationalWiki has been able to obtain Ken's plans for Operation Flying Fortress.]] | ||
| − | '''Conservative''' (aka. Kenneth "Ken" DeMyer, Peter Moore, Kenservative, Kdbuffalo, RuyLopez, Kenny Baby, {{Ken}}), is a search engine optimization magnate and international man of mystery. Among his many endeavors, Conservative is a [[Conservapedia]] sysop who rules the "[[Conservapedia:Evolution|Evolution]]", "[[Conservapedia:Atheism|Atheism]]" and all homosexuality-related articles while they slowly climb the ranks at popular search engines, much to the chagrin of atheists and homosexuals at large. | + | '''Conservative''' (aka. Kenneth "Ken" DeMyer, Peter Moore, Kenservative, Kdbuffalo, RuyLopez, Kenny Baby, {{Ken}}), is a [http://www.seop.com/search-engine-optimization/ search engine optimization] magnate and international man of mystery. Among his many endeavors, Conservative is a [[Conservapedia]] sysop who rules the "[[Conservapedia:Evolution|Evolution]]", "[[Conservapedia:Atheism|Atheism]]" and all homosexuality-related articles while they slowly climb the ranks at popular search engines, much to the chagrin of atheists and homosexuals at large. |
After being thrown out of Wikipedia for fragrantly<!-- deliberate typo--> breaking the sock-puppet rules (as he did on a number of forums<ref name=FR>[http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?p=4014051#post4014051 Freethought & Rationalism]</ref>), DeMyer came to Conservapedia, where he and his poor writing skills (as demonstrated by his use of poorly strung together copy+pasting) led to his near-whole-hearted embrace by the CP community. He now spends his days writing articles such as :"Atheism and _____" or "Homosexuality and _____" (fill in the blank with what ever you want really), looking up his articles on Google, and leaving not very well hidden [[Red Telephone|messages]] to RationalWiki. | After being thrown out of Wikipedia for fragrantly<!-- deliberate typo--> breaking the sock-puppet rules (as he did on a number of forums<ref name=FR>[http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?p=4014051#post4014051 Freethought & Rationalism]</ref>), DeMyer came to Conservapedia, where he and his poor writing skills (as demonstrated by his use of poorly strung together copy+pasting) led to his near-whole-hearted embrace by the CP community. He now spends his days writing articles such as :"Atheism and _____" or "Homosexuality and _____" (fill in the blank with what ever you want really), looking up his articles on Google, and leaving not very well hidden [[Red Telephone|messages]] to RationalWiki. | ||
Revision as of 02:30, 2 March 2010
Conservative (aka. Kenneth "Ken" DeMyer, Peter Moore, Kenservative, Kdbuffalo, RuyLopez, Kenny Baby, Ken), is a search engine optimization magnate and international man of mystery. Among his many endeavors, Conservative is a Conservapedia sysop who rules the "Evolution", "Atheism" and all homosexuality-related articles while they slowly climb the ranks at popular search engines, much to the chagrin of atheists and homosexuals at large.
After being thrown out of Wikipedia for fragrantly breaking the sock-puppet rules (as he did on a number of forums[1]), DeMyer came to Conservapedia, where he and his poor writing skills (as demonstrated by his use of poorly strung together copy+pasting) led to his near-whole-hearted embrace by the CP community. He now spends his days writing articles such as :"Atheism and _____" or "Homosexuality and _____" (fill in the blank with what ever you want really), looking up his articles on Google, and leaving not very well hidden messages to RationalWiki.
His "work" is notable for consisting almost entirely of other people's words or pictures. It is believed that the last original sound to come out of his mouth was the cry when the midwife slapped his rear end to start him breathing.
He is somewhat out of step with the other editors at Conservapedia. He imagines that atheism is dead on the Information Superhighway and evolution will soon die there. Others at Conservapedia however talk about the (imagined) need to battle the terrible liberal bias at Wikipedia which is run by atheists and evolutionists. They can't both be right. Now little Conservative, just because you want something to happen doesn't make it happen.
He is also, as of January 2009, a sysop on RationalWiki.
Let's Godwin yourself! (or, the Godwin singularity)
“”enlarged Hitler pic
|
| —Conservative, dominating the discussion from the edit summary onward, [1] |
According to Godwin's Law, as an internet debate goes on, the probability that someone will bring up Hitler or the Nazis rises to certainty. Going very fast to Godwin's point (let's say, at your third intervention) is considered to be a sign of aggressiveness, particulary if there are few people in the debate. However, Conservative is the only person able to reach a Godwin's point at the first paragraph of a monologue.
But that's good because "Godwin" includes "God" and "win". So, when you post a picture of Hitler in front of an article, you can say "In the name of God, I win the argument." Godwin's point.
Alter ego
Ken DeMyer is also an extremely bad sock puppeteer and troll, people can usually spot him in seconds generally because he never changes his tried and failed debating style[1][2].
Conservative, (prior to his arrival & elevation on Conservapedia) was much in evidence on Wikipedia. As "Kdbuffallo", Ken DeMyer of Buffalo NY[3], he created quite a stir. Among others here and here (there's more if you look) where he had been following his usual charming tactics: ignoring everyone else, quote mining and quoting other like-minded idiots. Nothing changes!
For a while Ken also participated at RationalWiki, under the name Newton.
Other known (or suspected) aliases
- kdbuffalo (WP)
- VacuousPoet[4] and other sockpuppets(WP)
- Freedom777[5] (CP)
- Ruylopez[6] (A Storehouse of Knowledge) - while Ruy Lopez and Conservative occasionally disavow each other when queried directly, all anecdotal evidence suggests they are one and the same, including Ruy Lopez answering to "Ken," his consistent and identical defense of Ken's pet sharticles (aren't everyone's bowels at least a little gay?), Ken's distinctive editing pattern and apparent admission that he is the author of the Gentlemen red telephones, constant reference to ___ on the internet, and consistent use of "in regards to" and other distinctive rhetorical flourishes.
- Peter Moore (forums)
- jonathondickenson (Internet Infidels forum[7] and Freethought & Rationalism Discussion Board, blocked for spamming)
- Mark Davidson (About.com - Atheism)
- David Beber (About.com - Atheism)
- Creationist (CreationWiki)
- Ingersoll (RichardDawkins.net)
- David Jensen (Mano Singham's Web Journal)
- Markg (Irish Atheists Forum)
- Dlmurray (Sourcewatch - spammed links to atheism, evolution & homosexuality.)
Amazingly Ken thinks that no-one can see through his masterful disguises and persists in hiding behind the curtain.[8]
"Publications" by Ken DeMyer
In one of his many shout-outs, Ken DeMyer implied that he had academic aspirations, which he may or may not be fulfilling. This does seem somewhat strange as his arguments are usually backed up with "evidence" in the form of quote mines, which are frowned upon as the quotes are usually out of context and in most cases are an example of the logical fallacy of argument from authority. As there are no publications to his name that are readily found, we can only judge his intellectual rigour by his many postings at forums across the internet.
Using his actual name(!) he was pwned here and here.
He was also a participant on TheologyWeb. His works are the usual topics; quote mine about evolutionist lies, quote mine on why people that are skeptical about the Bible are wrong, quote mine on why non-creationist biology is wrong and quote mine on why fossil record disagrees with evolution. He penned this long essay about dating Exodus where he copped pwnings such as this. A full collection of Ken DeMyer's quote mines can be found here (after registering and logging in).
As Kdbuffalo he posted on Internet Infidels where he tried once again to prove a point by quote mining on the failure of non-creationist astronomy, again when people are allowed to reply he cops a pwning.
It appears that throughout his internet forum "debating" career Ken DeMyer uses the same weak quotemining tactic - which seems to get him accused of dishonesty for some reason - loses the argument badly, and then starts another thread all the while believing he is destroying atheism and evolution on the internet. His retreat to Conservapedia is simply that for once he controls the ground rules. His articles are the kind of quote-mining seen before, he ignores any comments on talkpages, and locks his articles, userpage and shout-outs, so that he can shut down any debate from ever occurring. Pages and their histories are routinely memory holed to cover his tracks.
This is particularly hilarious as DeMyer is trying to convince someone that rabbit and hares "chew the cud" (that is they are pre-gut fermentors, animals which regurgitate their food and before consuming it again, like cows and camels) as it says in Leviticus, when it is a well established fact that rabbits and hares are hind gut fermentors (animals that re-eat their faeces to redigest the food). Simply cut a rabbit up and you would not see the multiple stomach arrangement you find in cows that even makes this possible. As always, he quotes a few guys he agrees with and fails epically in the face of actual evidence.
Conservative style, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and delusions
Conservative style usually includes the following characteristics:
- Taking several edits to make even the smallest changes to an article.
- Heavy reliance on quotes, almost to the exclusion of other text.
- Borrowing material from creationist blogs and other dubious sources, and attributing quotes inaccurately or out of context.
- Use of irrelevant pictures with inane captions, and pointless links to YouTube clips.
- Morbid preoccupations with homosexuality, atheism, evolution, suicide and Hitler.
- Obsession with search engine results and predictions about them.[9]
- Excessive adverbial use of the word "likely" when making these predictions.
- Poor sentence structure and repetitive use of the same words (especially "however").
- A penchant for beginning sentences with the words "In regards to".
- Spamming the Main Page and other sysops' talk pages with "news" regarding search engine results and pictures of Hitler.
- Apparent indifference to ridicule.[10]
- Announcing "exciting new developments" or "major developments" expected in relation to his pet articles.[11]
- Finishing a sentence with more than one exclamation mark or a smiley emoticon, the sure sign of a diseased mind.
- Appealing to authority when his shabby "scholarship" is exposed (my expert published 500 more papers than yours, gay bowel syndrome is real!1!! :) )
- On 13th and 14th June, 2009, Ken engaged in a marathon 30-hour edit spree. (See image on left.)
Quote mine about Ken DeMyer
In regards to DeMyer's quote mining, Patchy of the Freethought and Rationalism Discussion Board wrote, "until such time as he can articulate and defend his own argument or question in his own words, he can be very safely ignored [12]."
To support this view, evolutionist PZ Myers from the University of Minnesota wrote the following regarding his constant need for attention:
“”This twit, calling himself Peter Moore (also known as Ken DeMyer, or Kdbuffalo, as he was known on Wikipedia before being banned there), is repeating himself over and over again, asking the same stupid question, never satisfied with any answer anyone gives him. Forty nine insipid comments in three days is enough.[13]
|
Furthermore, atheist Austin Cline wrote this with regards to his search engine optimization:
“”Your attempts at link-spamming will fail because search engines don’t index the comments here. Thanks for trying — it has been amusing, I won’t deny it, but all the time and effort you’ve spent on that has been wasted. So there is no need to find excuses to include links back to your own Conservapedia articles. It won’t help any more than trying to use passive-aggressive tactics to get me to link to your irrelevant and unimportant articles in the hopes of having them rise up in search engine rankings.[14]
|
Kenny's mammoth subpage count
Userpage subpages
Conservative
Conservative-Research-American-Atheists-organization
Conservative/Alexa
Conservative/Causes-of-atheism
Conservative/ChristianApologetics
Conservative/Christianbusinesses
Conservative/Complaints
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-2
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-3
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-4
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats
Conservative/CreationistResources
Conservative/Darwin-Hitler-pics
Conservative/Dawkins
Conservative/English-Countries
Conservative/EvolutionAsSocialConstruct
Conservative/Gentlemen-you-are-being-grossly-deficient-about-Conservapedia-reporting -again
Conservative/JohnsHopkins
Conservative/LearningADHDandOther
Conservative/Mail
Conservative/Margaret Sanger
Conservative/Nazism-professor-values-newspapers-church
Conservative/Online Videos Regarding Atheism
Conservative/Online Videos on the Theory of Evolution
Conservative/Planned Parenthood Conservative/PleaseClicktheLinkBelow
Conservative/R1
Conservative/Reasonable explanations for the existence of evolutionary belief
Conservative/ResurrectionRequest
Conservative/abortionworkspace
Conservative/alexa
Conservative/atheismrelatedresearch
Conservative/atheistswebtraffic
Conservative/awaymessage
Conservative/biaswikipedia
Conservative/churchbloggingwebsite
Conservative/coding
Conservative/comingattraction
Conservative/contact
Conservative/documentaryhypothesis
Conservative/e
Conservative/evo
Conservative/evolution-new-temp-file
Conservative/hitlerevolution
Conservative/homosexualityresearch2
Conservative/intelligent design
Conservative/internetusageandrelatedresearch
Conservative/list
Conservative/lookupwebsiteinternetserviceprovider
Conservative/m
Conservative/mail
Conservative/marketshare
Conservative/microevolution-vs-macroevolution
Conservative/networking
Conservative/newresearch
Conservative/paleoanthropology-field
Conservative/picuploading
Conservative/research-liberalism-psychology
Conservative/resurrectionmiracles
Conservative/speedoflight
Conservative/temp
Conservative/temp1
Conservative/tempannouncementholdingarea
Conservative/testing
Conservative/vistors-location
Talk subpages
Conservative
Conservative-Research-American-Atheists-organization Conservative/Archive1
Conservative/Archive2
Conservative/Archive 1
Conservative/Atheism and deceit
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-2
Conservative/Conservapedia-running-stats-3
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats
Conservative/Conservapediarunningstats2
Conservative/Dear-Evolutionist-Ladies-and-Gentlemen
Conservative/EVOLUTIONANDFRAUD
Conservative/Evolutionist-Ladies-and-Gentlemen
Conservative/Gentleman-Norseman-you-failed
Conservative/Gentleman-anti-regarding-paddleboat
Conservative/Gentleman-antifly-regarding-paddleboat
Conservative/Gentleman-your-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations- grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
Conservative/Gentlemen-A-if-you-could-be-more-sensible-in-the-future-it-would-be-appreciated
Conservative/Gentlemen-Have-you-noticed-the-search-engine-rankings-for-the-evolution-article-lately?
Conservative/Gentlemen-I-hate-to-burst-your-bubble-but
Conservative/Gentlemen-It-appears-as-if-the-saying-is-true
Conservative/Gentlemen-Operation-Grassroots-has-started
Conservative/Gentlemen-Operation-Grassroots-has-started-for-the-evolution-article
Conservative/Gentlemen-a-question
Conservative/Gentlemen-almost-so-very-close-step-by-step-inch-by-inch-there-will-be-a-top-ranked-article-that-stabs-at-the-very-heart-of-liberalism-EVOLUTION
Conservative/Gentlemen-almost-so-very-close-step-by-step-inch-by-inch-there-will-be-a-top-ranked-article-that-stabs-at-the-very-heart-of-liberalism-EVOLUTIONISM
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolotion-grassroots-and-expansiveness
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolution-article-search-engine-rankings
Conservative/Gentlemen-evolution-grassroots-and-expansiveness
Conservative/Gentlemen-grassroots-and-expansiveness
Conservative/Gentlemen-if-you-could-be-more-sensible-in-the-future-it-would-be-appreciated
Conservative/Gentlemen-it-is-coming
Conservative/Gentlemen-it-seems-as-if-internet-evolutionists-are-a-paranoid-lot
Conservative/Gentlemen-please-read-number-20
Conservative/Gentlemen-regarding-the-main-page-of-Conservapedia-and-the-Hitler-and-Darwin pics
Conservative/Gentlemen-regarding-your-most-recent-offer
Conservative/Gentlemen-resistance-is-futile
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Day-is-going-to-be-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-are-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-are-going-to-be-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-on-the-internet-are-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of- 2009
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolution-D-Days-on-the-internet-are-likely-going-to-be-happening-the-first-quarter-of-the-calendar-year-of-2009
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolutionists-and-the-internet Conservative/Gentlemen-the-anti-evolutionists-are-going-to-hit-key- places
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-evolution-article-now-ranks-number-11-at-a-very-popular-search-engine-that-begins-with-a-G-for-the-very-popular-search-evolution
Conservative/Gentlemen-the-evolution-article-now-ranks-number-12-at-a-very-popular-search-engine-that-begins-with-a-G-for-the-very-popular-search-evolution
Conservative/Gentlemen-this-is-merely-a-fraction-of-what-I-believe-operations-flying-fortresses-and-grassroots-will-produce
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-happened-to-atheism-is-going-to-happen-to-evolution
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-happened-to-atheism-on-the-internet-is-going-to-happen-to-evolution
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-short-memories-you-have
Conservative/Gentlemen-what-short-memories-you-have-or-crushing-evolution-on-the-internet-like-a-tin-can
Conservative/Gentlemen-you-are-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations- grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
Conservative/Gentlemen-your-reports-of-conservapedia-dying-have-been-greatly-exaggerated
Conservative/Gentlemen-your-taking-your-eye-off-the-ball-it-is-the-evolution-and-atheism-articles-that-are-the-key-to-operations- grassroots-and-flying-fortresses
Conservative/Hoji
Conservative/Homosexuality and MRSA
Conservative/LearningADHDandOther
Conservative/Ms-Kels-you-can-say-you-were-wrong-now-as-far-as-the-new-title-of-the-evolution-article-sometimes-a-liberal-has-to-recognize-their-limitations
Conservative/Operation-flying-fortresses
Conservative/ResurrectionRequest
Conservative/atheism-and-cowardice-article
Conservative/atheismrelatedresearch
Conservative/awaymessage
Conservative/cpctraffic
Conservative/gentlemen-you protest entirely too much
Conservative/homosexualityresearch
Conservative/medical-science-doctors-vs-other-scientists
Conservative/mutationsnaturalselection
Conservative/running stats
Conservative/socialeffectevolution
Conservative/to-liberal-gentlemen-regarding-atheism-article
Conservative/transitionalforms
And there were more:
All deleted pages beginning with User:Conservative - at time of count 526.
All deleted pages beginning with User_talk:Conservative - at time of count 61.
Some edited highlights of these lists:
- 02:46, 26 October 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/letter" (content was: 'Holt Paperbacks Published: April 2006 ISBN 9780805078046 ISBN 0805078045 Trim: 5-1/2 x 8-1/4 inches 432 pages' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 23:17, 11 October 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/intelligent design" (content was: 'e n Zewedge YknC\hg UknC\hg A&#...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 20:29, 25 September 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Gentlemen-at-a-liberal-website-do-not-be-surprised-if-the-Hitler-and-Darwin-evolutionary-racism-pics-and-captions-return-to-the-main-page" (content was: 'Gentlemen, Do not be surprised if the Hitler/Darwin/Evolutionary/racism pics and captions return to the main page. 2009 sees the bicentenary of Darwin...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 18:57, 20 June 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/vb" (content was: '==Viral Buzz and Viral Marketing Links== Free: http://www.copyblogger.com/how-to-get-huge-viral-buzz-for-your-start-up/ http://buzzmarketingfortech.b...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 09:31, 4 May 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Conservative/douche" (content was: 'foajfowajdfoajw' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 23:38, 8 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Gentleman-Palm-allopathic-white-coat" (content was: 'Gentleman-Palm-allopathic,I glanced at your blog. It seems you are especially note happy with a certain category of Conservapedia articles. :) 23:...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 23:38, 8 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/IDES-OF-MARCH" (content was: '#REDIRECT User:Conservative/Ghost of Google Rankings for Atheism Yet to Come' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 01:34, 7 April 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/Ghost of Google Rankings for Atheism Yet to Come" (The eagle has landed!)
- 22:54, 29 March 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/IDES-OF-MARCH" (content was: 'Gentleman at another wiki,I believe something big is going to be happening in regards to the atheism article at Conservapedia that is occuring outsi...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
- 19:02, 21 February 2008 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/nffrf" (content before blanking was: 'http://www.mapelli.info/tools/supplemental-index-ratio-calculator/http://www.evancarmichael.com/SEO/1191/Search-Engine-Optimization-Careers.html')
- 22:34, 30 August 2007 Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Conservative/hatecrime" (content was: 'Please copy the pic of the protestors with signs: http://www.operationrescue.org/Illegal drug pic: http://www.dea.gov/photos/meth/powder_meth_foil.j...' (and the only contributor was 'Conservative'))
The extremely bizarre
The most peculiar sub page ever was User:Conservative/Gentlemen-resistance-is-futile, the contents was copied here, it a 80kb file consisting mainly of "LOL!" repeated over and over. In case you are wondering the evidence suggests he is 46 years old.
Explanation
He's a "bot":
- 16:41, 10 September 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Conservative from sysop to bot
OK, it was a ASchlafly slip of the finger, but still ...?
[I]f I could find my javascript implementation, with a few tweaks I could almost certainly replace Ken with a very small shell script. --JeevesMkII
Awards
 This is to certify that received the WILLIAM DEMBSKI INTELLIGENT DESIGN AWARD FOR AESTHETICALLY UNPLEASANT DESIGN From RationalWiki, on November 21, 2008 |
 This is to certify that received the CRY BABY POO-PANTS AWARD FOR CHILDISHNESS From RationalWiki, on November 21, 2008 |
 |
This is to certify that received the FRED WOULD BE PROUD OF YOU AWARD FOR HOMOPHOBIA From RationalWiki, on November 21, 2009 |
 |
This is to certify that received the ED POOR IDIOT OF THE YEAR AWARD From RationalWiki, on November 21, 2009 |
|
|
This is to certify that received the WILLIAM DEMBSKI INTELLIGENT DESIGN AWARD FOR AESTHETICALLY UNPLEASANT DESIGN From RationalWiki, on November 21, 2009 |
See also
- A picture of Ken's User page on Conservapedia (resized for your convenience)
- Conservapedia:Summa Homosexualita - Conservative's pièce de résistance
- Red Telephone - Conservative's public addresses to RationalWiki
- Homosexuality
- Sexual identity
- Homoschooling
- DeMyer's Laws
- Danth's Law
- Fun:Argumentum ad Google ranking
- Fun:Ken Quote Generator
External links
- His Conservapedia userpage - Enjoy his witty parody of evolution.
- Operation Flying Grassroots Fortress - Kenservative: The Computer Game. (Now this is parody).
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Freethought & Rationalism
- ↑ Here someone catches one of Ken's socks
- ↑ Ken leaves his UserID at the University of NY, Buffalo in his reference http://www.jstor.org/view/00335770/dm994628/99p0820w/0?frame=noframe&userID=80cd7358@buffalo.edu/01cc99331400501c9318c&dpi=3&config=jstor
- ↑ Ken is adamant this is not him, a check user on Wikipedia found that both kdbuffalo and VacuousPoet were editing from the same IP range which belonged to a large university. The case hinged on the fact they had similar writing styles.
- ↑ Freedom777 wrote Conservapedia's article on cp:Intelligent Design and was made a sysop. However, he only ever corresponded with Ken and has not made any further edits. The writing style is unlike Ken's convoluted prose and required fewer edits to post than a single sentence of Ken's. It is believed that the article was written by someone else offline and Freedom777 was a proxy for Ken to uploading the article. Note that Ken's Skype name for his SEO services is creation333777.
- ↑
After this exposure at CP, Ken burned his usertalk pageRuy Lopez obliquely admits to authoring the Gentlemen series, providing more concrete evidence that he is Ken - ↑ Ken as jonathondickenson
- ↑ Gentlemen-it-seems-as-if-internet-evolutionists-are-a-paranoid-lot
- ↑ http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexuality&diff=396827&oldid=380592
- ↑ When he is being ridiculed he will often trot out the phrase, "appeal to ridicule is a logical fallacy". This appears to be the only logical fallacy he is aware of, as he fails to notice at least 12 different forms of logical fallacies in his evolution article.
- ↑ However, no developments of any kind, either exciting or major, have happened to Conservapedia in a loooooooooooong time.
- ↑ http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?s=d4e0a0b5fb3b960bf37a367b131be2e1&p=4013923#post4013923
- ↑ http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/once_more_into_the_haeckelian.php
- ↑ http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/05/16/jimmy-swaggart-ministries-v-california-1990.htm
