User talk:Kupochama

From RationalWiki

Welcome to RationalWiki, Kupochama! Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards. If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be. Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Ace McWicked^Necron99 21:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll do my best to find things to do, and also figure out where the goat reference came from. ~ Kupochama _talk 21:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

No one knows where the goat reference came from... Though if you want stuff to do, drop by the to do list, there might be something there that interests you. If not, just click "random page" until something perks your interest, it keeps me busy :) ArmondikoV^{...I'll throw your league!} 21:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Thus it's a fine lifelong dream, to be the discoverer the Lost Goat of Rationality. But I didn't know there was a list, so I'll check that out instead. Thanks. ;) ~ Kupochama _talk 21:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Contents 1 Sysop 2 Mei 3 Earthland 4 happy 5 w 6 w 7 Cute sig

[edit] Sysop

due to length of service you have been cursed with a sysopship. Ace McWicked^{Model 500} 21:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

and heres a useless helpful sysop guide. Ace McWicked^{Model 500} 21:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Neat. I was away for about half of the week I've spent registered, but nevermind that. Thanks, I'll abuse my cursed powers janitorial duties all I can. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 21:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

You seem like a horrible person nice chap so there ya go. Ace McWicked^{Model 500} 21:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Mei

Welcome to MeiWiki, Kupochama. Please see this political leaflet and this badge of support, which you should adopt as soon as possible. Vote for Mei. Mei is useful.

Have a chair and a drink. -- =w= 07:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I reject your offer on the grounds that I haven't seen Lucky Star. Someday, perhaps... ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 17:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Earthland

Beware debating Earthland. He is completely closed to reason and will eventually grind you down by sheer force of boredom and then claim victory. He has made it quite clear that, as far as he is concerned:-

1. Life, in every sense of the word, begins at conception.
2. Those that disagree with this are either immoral, ignorant or pushing an agenda.
3. Anyone who has an abortion, assists in an abortion, or, for that matter, uses an IUD, is guilty of murder. However, when pushed on this as to what should be done about these murderers he always ducks the question.
4. Anyone who fails to be convinced by his quote mined selection of links, often from papers with very dubious sources has a closed mind and is guilty of logical fallacies.

His standard debating technique is to reply to any point with a 3,000 character mini essay concentrating on the points where he can find quotes from far right pro-life sites or simplistic generalities from encyclopaedia and completely ignoring any points he can't answer - for example What are the consequences of calling anyone who uses an IUD a murderer?. If you then fail to reply to each and every one of his points he will then claim that you failed to answer any of them and claim victory. This leads to a geometric explosion of responses until you reach boredom level at which point he wins.

It's fun for a while but.... Bob Soles (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

True enough. I figured I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and try to clarify a few chunks of the discussion, but I'm not sure it helped. Kinda hard to remember what we're talking about now that it's "humans are humans before they are humans because humans don't physically assemble each other" and such.

Still, it beats reading CP essays. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 12:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Bob Soles, "the expert of Earthland"? Better share your expertise with RWW, where they are waiting for this kind of bullshit.

I don't think I have ever really said that if you don't agree with me you are immoral. Due to my weak choice of words it may sometimes seem that those who don't oppose abortion are always "immoral", but I have never clearly said so.

You should know that I don't call everyone who have had an abortion murderers, and I do not call anyone who uses an IUD murderer. Don't fall into this kind of lying.

I haven't said that someone has "closed mind" and I have only pointed out very certain logical fallacies.

That I am "closed to reason" remains just an assertion. On the other hand, that most of what I have ever said in this wiki is left unanswered is plain fact. Think about it.

--Earthland (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

I have no problem with the topic itself, but please stop saying that no one answers you. Your essay talk needs an archive now, and as I recall, your others also got above average attention. If it's not enough, there're forums that specialize in these things. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 01:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed this. I like Bob...and kupo. Both are dead on. =) δ_ij^i.broke.it. 16:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] happy

MEMO Happy New Year, Kupochama. This is from Useful Mei. It is an appropriate time for festivities, like alcohol. Today try not to eat too much, or too little.

-- =w= 06:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

~ Kupochama^[1][2] 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] w

1. Mars?
2. I AM RESTING FROM TIDYING I WILL DO MORE TIDYING SOON ;______; -- =w= 19:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

1. This. It stars a guy named Rei, a rebel without a cause who secretly misses his brother who was secretly a big jerk. Popular among teenage girls and teenage Kupochama.
2. I was going to go insert links and grammar to show you up, but couldn't find any after several random pages. :( ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 19:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] w

That's why they call me Superfast Mei. And by 'they' I mean myself. -- Mei 04:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I recently acquired some long-overdue documents which depict you as being more relaxed. Please live up to my mental imagery at once by vandal-binning yourself. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 04:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Manga!Konata doesn't look like anime!Konata for ages. Ages! Mei is superfast in the sense of paying too much attention to internet things & that is totally in character. -- Mei 05:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I dunno, the art started pretty well/similar, at least compared to some (early Fruits Basket is terrifying that way). That aside, I'll concede your Internet for now, but I'm onto you... ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 05:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I just flipped through vol 1 and I think I was wrong. It's just that cover that looks wrong to me. + it describes Konata as 'a very energetic girl'! Which is why I am reclaiming my Superfast title. -- Mei 05:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Cute sig

That is all. ħuman 03:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm worried it's a bit overweight, though. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 16:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)