User:Armondikov
From RationalWiki
As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism. I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all?
If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORATIE", er, there is nothing I can or will do.
- I be a pirate from the UK. Mostly, I not be knownin' what ye be talkin' about.
- On a serious side, I'm a chemistry graduate starting a PhD later this year. So mostly, I still don't know what you're talking about.
Known Subpages of this page: Dawinism, Vandalism
[edit] My (currently, lack of) CP Activity
I initially had two banned sock accounts on CP. It turns out they can read well; Dessip backwards is indeed "pissed" (I also got 100 Conservatroll points for getting a Godspeed!!!!!). Well, every second of their time wasted is worth it. Whenever I feel sorry for Conservapedia and attempting to ruin it, I just read their article on homosexuality and it all goes away.
Another sock, named after Trivium's lead singer, had a longer spell, creating lots of fake(ish) articles. Obviously, they read RationalWiki as they figured it out from reading the article matrix. But they didn't revert any of the edits made by Messr Heafy for several days afterwards... is that them just admiting that they're indistinguishable from parody or did I just not try enough??!?!
I don't do much socking at the moment (or just to spike the paronoia: or do I?). Between work and home I have enough IP addresses to get through quite nicely but whether one can jump between the two quick enough to enact a double team action is unknown. Mostly, that new catchpa thing is unreadable so it's near enough impossible to register unless you're really, really driven...
[edit] My RW Activity
I've done a bit of editing to some of the biology/chemistry articles here and there and will probably continue to do so. Although they're kind of a side track to RWs aims, I think it's worth having complete articles rather than stubs because of the internal linking and to make it look more serious when seriousness is needed.
Clicking "random page" repeatedly until I find a stub that I know something about works well too.
Now regarding bragging. Apparently this is what all good editors do.
- Age of Enlightenment
- Bowling for Columbine
- Bradley effect
- Conservapedia:Acolyte
- Conservapedia:Creationism syndrome
- Enzyme
- Ethanol
- Freeganism
- Fundies Say the Darndest Things
- Grief tourism
- John Safran
- Labour Party
- Lucid dream
- Popular science
- Pro-choice
- SETI
- Science of Discworld
- Sock puppet
- The Godless Girl
- The Pentagon
- Unschooling
[edit] Misc
Random sh*te
|

