User talk:AKjeldsen/Archive3

Ajkeldsen

Is he Danish? Ethnic German? SHahB 14:14, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Being a construct and the result of a thoroughly unwholesome mind, I'd gues he more or less defies such easy categorization. Or maybe he's just Swiss. It's impossible to tell sometimes. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 14:41, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

That's funny, I always thought he was a human being. And now you're saying he's European? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 14:50, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Merely suggesting the idea, without claiming certainty. Indeed, it is likely that we will never reach certainty on this subject. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 14:55, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

I come from a mixed Greek-Swiss background. Ajkeldsen 18:20, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

So the feta cheese is used to fill the holes in the Swiss? human 19:36, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Now that sounds fairly unappealing. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 05:46, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

I shall fight you till the end of time. Ajkeldsen 12:00, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

Q: Why do Danish people never play hide and seek? A: Nobody wants to look for them. Timppeli 16:19, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Ooh, burn. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:34, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Sandalism

Please define sandalism. This might be something I can use against you in the future. SHahB 16:17, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Define sandalism!? Have you taken leave of your senses, man?66.96.196.22 16:20, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Its a reasonable question. SHahB 16:21, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Isn't.66.96.196.22 16:23, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Is. SHahB 16:23, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

n't.66.96.196.22 16:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Tis. SHahB 16:25, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

'Taint.77.128.28.116 16:27, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Um. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 16:25, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Wait. Are you not the IP? SHahB 16:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Trust a sandal to bish up the issue.77.128.28.116 16:27, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

No. I'm 83.73.some.thing. 66. is not Danish. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 16:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Don't ever wear socks with sandals. human 22:00, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

What's wrong with that? I do it all the time. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 11:40, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Only Red Sea pedestrians can fully pull off the "Jesus boot" + sock combo. Fact. Fox 16:42, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

opinion needed

I am interested in your opinion on this since you represent the more radical sector of Denmark's population. SHahB 15:17, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I think it's positive, and I support it completely. Greenland is going to become independent sooner or later, and we have a responsibility to assist them as necessary to get to a point where that is possible. If nothing else, then at least to help them defend against the jingoistic ambitions of the Evöl Canadians. --AKjeldsen^{Supporting loonies since 2002!} 15:36, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Really? So you are breaking from the ultranationalist line of thought for once? This is a welcome change. Perhaps you want me to tell you a little more about this thing we call "tolerance"? SHahB 15:40, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

You're confusing me with yourself again, Horatio. --AKjeldsen^{Supporting loonies since 2002!} 15:42, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Your anti-Canadian sentiment is alarming. Is that the new group that the Danish ultra-right hates? SHahB 15:44, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Hardly. It is a matter of common knowledge that Canadians, beneath their fluffy appearance, harbour strongly imperialistic ambitions as witnessed by their many unbridled acts of aggression against Danish/Greenlandic territory. I refer, of course, particularly to the several incidents at Hans Island. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:51, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Anders, you're clueless. I am well aware of these so-called "incidents". Hans Island is Canadian territory, and only the chauvinists are trying to claim it as ours. Don't tell me you believe it is Danish land? SHahB 15:54, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Not only do I believe that, Hernandez, this is also the official position of the Danish government and the Greenlandic administration, and clearly supported by a long international legal precedence. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:02, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Might I remind you that slavery was also long supported by international legal precedence. And this is just an example of extremists hijacking the Danish government. The ambassador is Poul E. D. Kristensen who, if I am not mistaken, was lambasted for burning a Canadian flag and threatening that Denmark would deport all of the Canadian expats in the country. SHahB 16:06, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I can assure you that you are quite mistaken, both in your severe misapprehension of our ambassador's character and in your false analogy between the two entirely different concepts of slavery and territorial sovereignty. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:12, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I don't want your assurances. I would call you a bigot, but " Genghis Khant " (one of the editors who has a strange vendetta against me) is editing. Please take this test and tell me the results. SHahB 16:15, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

100% "Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants". Anything else? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:27, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Give me all the results. And fix your signature SHahB 16:31, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, if you insist.

1. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (100%)

2. Liberal Quakers (81%)

3. Bahá'í Faith (74%)

4. Eastern Orthodox (69%)

5. Roman Catholic (69%)

6. Unitarian Universalism (68%)

7. Reform Judaism (65%)

8. Orthodox Quaker (65%)

9. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (64%)

10. Sikhism (64%)

11. Seventh Day Adventist (53%)

12. Orthodox Judaism (53%)

13. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (52%)

14. Neo-Pagan (51%)

15. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (46%)

16. New Age (45%)

17. Secular Humanism (43%)

18. Islam (39%)

19. New Thought (38%)

20. Jehovah's Witness (37%)

21. Mahayana Buddhism (36%)

22. Theravada Buddhism (35%)

23. Hinduism (33%)

24. Taoism (32%)

25. Jainism (30%)

26. Scientology (29%)

27. Nontheist (24%)

--AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:41, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I don't know if I can ever associate with you again. SHahB 16:43, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Oooh. Which one is that bad? The Liberal Quakers? Baha'i? Reform Judaism? Or something else? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:46, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Neo pagan. SHahB 16:49, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

At a measly 51%? Come on. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:52, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

And your Islam is so low. SHahB 16:58, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Yes, but it's much higher than Scientology, and that's what matters. Besides, the test seems pretty oriented towards Christians. I mean, over half a dozen different Christian denominations, but only one "Islam"? That's not right! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:17, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Please cease your whining. I don't know anything about the test. It comes from a link on a humanist wikipedian's userpage. SHahB 17:27, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm not whining, I'm merely pointing out a methodological problem with the test - which, by the way, I believe it is your turn to take now. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:35, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

I took it already. SHahB 17:37, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

mememe

1. Secular Humanism (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (98%)
3. Liberal Quakers (91%)
4. Theravada Buddhism (82%)
5. Neo-Pagan (75%)
6. Nontheist (71%)
7. Taoism (71%)
8. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (68%)
9. New Age (59%)
10. Orthodox Quaker (58%)
11. Mahayana Buddhism (55%)
12. Reform Judaism (49%)
13. Jainism (40%)
14. Bahá'í Faith (37%)
15. Scientology (34%)
16. Sikhism (33%)
17. New Thought (31%)
18. Seventh Day Adventist (29%)
19. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (24%)
20. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (23%)
21. Hinduism (23%)
22. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (18%)
23. Eastern Orthodox (13%)
24. Islam (13%)
25. Orthodox Judaism (13%)
26. Roman Catholic (13%)
27. Jehovah's Witness (8%)

human 17:43, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Thwarted

Jer miste, fæ. Ajkeldsen 03:39, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I see. For your information, if you're going for a translation of "you lose, fool", the correct rendition would be "du har tabt, (dit) fæ." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:27, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

What exactly is it that I have lost, by the way? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:28, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I don't use slang. That was formal Danish. Ajkeldsen 15:31, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

That was utterly incomprehensible. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:31, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

This conversation was much funnier before I realised you were two people. ^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 16:33, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

You can't really be sure of that, can you? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:44, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Adrian, your ignorance of the Danish language is none of my concern. Ajkeldsen 16:37, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Proksi tekla rebslaker fiord kadorna. Heheheh. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:44, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Really? In which bidet? ^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 16:47, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Why, my neighbour's, of course. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:55, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

funny

BTW, not sure if you saw this hilarious joke: [1]. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 21:12, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Did you like the joke? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 12:05, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

I found it somewhat too generic, too bland. It did not reference anything particularly Danish. It could have been used in exactly the same way with Swedes, or Czechs, or Patagonian penguins, for that matter. A really effective joke should build on something that is particular to the target. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 12:15, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

No, that was precisely what made it so humourous. I guess along with decency, you also lack a sound sense of humor. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:15, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Anders...

it seems you have restored your profanity. Why is this? Is this a way to express anger, to release your rage and aggression? Or do you have no sense of proper social behaviour? Please cease posting this on pages in my userspace. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 12:05, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

No significant amount of rage hedre, thanks. And I have an excellent sense of proper social behaviour, it is just that sometimes I choose to disregard what it tries to tell me. Sometimes I do this to make a point. But mostly I just do it for the lulz. Cheers. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 12:17, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

For lulz? Yes, now I am sure you lack a sound sense of humour. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:16, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

My humours are perfectly balanced, thankyouverymuch. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:21, 8 May 2008 (EDT) _{Get it? Eh? Eh? Humour/humours? That's solid gold for you right there!}

Anders, I notice you are logged on often. How are the studies going these days? Have you dropped out yet? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:27, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for your concern. I am currently on a leave of absence from the studies in order to focus on earning huge amounts of cash. The studies will resume in the autumn. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:44, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

No concern. Just a desire for some lulz at your expense. So you commence failure in the autumn? When are you expected to make the drop out final? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:47, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

I can inform you that I expect to graduate with flying colours not just once but twice - once with an MA degree from a prestigious British university next summer, and after that with an MPhil from the #1 Danish university in the summer of 2009. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:50, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

And Denmark is well known for its universities</sarcasm> --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:52, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

We are indeed! Just three years ago, U. of Copenhagen's Faculty of Humanities was ranked #18 in the world by the Times Higher Education Supplement. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:03, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Riiiight. You keep believing you're getting a good education. I left Denmark to pursue degrees in Norway, where education is valued. And they don't hold classes in windmills. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:19, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

By that do you mean classes that are held in windmills, or classes about windmills? I couldn't put anything past those zany clogspawn Danes.^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 14:26, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Behold, a duality of doppelgangers! -- ^{dia nairati}namuħ   14:22, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Most appropriate! 85, despite my counterpart's confused ramblings to the contrary, we do not hold classes in windmills. The only thing we do in windmills is produce electricity. On the other hand, we do indeed hold many classes about windmills, as Denmark is one of the leading nations in that industry. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:55, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Counterpart? I prefer arch rival, or sworn enemy. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:58, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Archnemesis? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:59, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

As you say, acceptable. But not my first choice. --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:03, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

This is not really an issue that I have strong opinions about, so feel free to style yourself arch rival or sworn enemy if you prefer either one of those. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:05, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't be so modest. How about the "vengeful Dane"? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:09, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

A'right lads. What's going down in groove town? --KJAldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:03, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Sweet mother of mercy. At this rate, we can have a garden party soon. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:11, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Now we need DMlaP and Hugh Powell. Don't worry, though, I will try not to sign like this ever again. Unless it's sorta funny. --KJAldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:15, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Quote mining you on "The Bible"

Remember I accused you of revisionism, but I couldn't find the page? Well I've taken the liberty of editing together your comments on Talk:Actions which demand the death penalty in the Old Testament and User talk:Eira. I thought it was fun. All quotes are from you. :-)

Usually, of course, it (the bible) is seen in the format of a book, but that does not mean that it is one book. It's just like if you had an anthology such as the "20th Century Philosophy Reader" or something like that - lots of different works that are related, but which have entirely different styles and viewpoints. AKjeldsen

The proverbial 'reasonable person' would never doubt that "Bible" in this context, by means of centuries of usage, refers to a particular book, rather than just books in general - just as there is no doubt that "Newcastle" usually refers to a specific city in Northern England. AKjeldsen

That just doesn't seem like a fruitful way of approaching the subject, because it is much more than just one book. It is an extremely complicated collection of texts that have appeared over the course of a millennium, by God knows how many different writers, and under vastly different cultural and historical circumstances.

Despite the numerous differences between the many Bible versions, there is no doubt that it is fundamentally the same work. AKjeldsen

It ... really doesn't make much sense to simply lump the Old and the New Testaments as one big "The Bible" - it is, after all, two entirely different pacts, and the relationship between them is much more complex than that. AKjeldsen

Again, while it is correct that the Bible is made up of many different sources, and that many different translations and versions exist, the fact is that taken together, these constitute a corpus of materials that we collectively label as "the Bible." For the average person, this label is sufficient to identify the work. AKjeldsen

But I guess this just shows what an indecent process quote mining is. :-) --Bob^{bing up} 12:28, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

Hehe. Obviously, AK is a "Biblical Moderationist", and has been caught discussing issues on separate occasions with the "Biblical Liberationists" and the "Liberation Biblicists". human 12:40, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

Nothing but blatant Liberal scroll. Silly liberals.^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 12:43, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

That is a powerful weapon you have there, Bob. Please use it only for good and not for evil. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:18, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

PFoster makes a point

Pwned!

Question

Have you ever played Danish roulette? Do you want to? SHahB 02:08, 15 May 2008 (EDT) (it involves clogs)

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with that particular pastime. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 02:29, 15 May 2008 (EDT)

Let me get this straight, you hate Tommy Seebach and you are not familiar with Danish roulette? Are you even Danish? SHahB 20:16, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Mostly... --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:56, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Lies! You're not... Spanish are you?? --KJAldsen^{Cum dissensie} 21:03, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Mostly??? I expect a detailed report of your ethnic background, and I want it now. SHahB 22:48, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Partly purple, partly pink, slightly brown (in summer), and mostly Special. human 00:24, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

What the hell is happening in your interpretation of this conversation?? --KJAldsen^{Cum dissensie} 00:26, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Partly brown, slightly white, lovely purple, with overtones of pepper. human 01:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Gibberish, I say! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 01:55, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Partly smurple, partly jelly, partly tentacles, slime on the beach. Don't step on it!!! human 02:13, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't panic. Try wearing sandals. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 02:16, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Eh. Ethinicity is just social construction, anyway. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 09:36, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

I could care less about what you think of ethnicity. Quit stalling, Andrew. Give me the report. SHahB 14:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

The A in "AKjeldsen" actually stands for Amaranth. Which is a very pretty name for a girl <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 14:57, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Hee hee. Burn! SHahB 15:02, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. I like it. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:20, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

65% Danish, 25% German, 10% Russian, 5% Miscellaneous/Unknown. Anything else? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:20, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Sounds like a fancy way of saying either: "I am a 5% mysterious nazi/soviet" or "I hate myself". I, on the other hand, am 100 percent pure Danish. And proud. SHahB 22:18, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

And since when can someone be 105% anything? SHahB 22:19, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Also, the percentages are constrained by genetics to be integer multiples of 100/2ⁿ (like, 37.5+6.25+6.25+25+25). human 22:29, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Wrong, fool. I am a SCIENTIST, so I would know. SHahB 22:39, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

I can, because I'm so awesome an' larger than life, yo!!! Also, I strongly doubt there is such a thing as a 100% Dane. Going back long enough, most of are Germans. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:17, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Go back further, and I suspect that all of us are 100% Africans. human 13:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm afraid Shabby would be in for a rude shock if he ever had a DNA test. The phrase "100% Danish" is meaningless. Shabby, you are obviously only pretending to be a scientist. No scientist woul spout such gibberish. Unless you're a creationist. IN that case, all bets are off. Rational Ed^think! 14:59, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

I suppose it depends on what "database" one is bothering to analyse. For instance, all my ancestors that are known to me as a layman were born in Wales, as I was, so I am "100%" Welsh". But if I did any "research" at all, I would certainly encounter some English pollution in my otherwise pure blood pretty quickly. And further research would find... Norman, Saxon, Roman, other Gaelic/Celtic/Breton etc., and on and on until Great Great ... Great Great Grandma Lucy... and on and on until Great Grandsquish Blue Green Algae, until I got back to the first successful proto-strand of an acid with a double-helix structure. I agree, Hank made a very unscientific claim. human 15:07, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Unless he actually is decended from two pastries! Rational Ed^think! 15:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, there is that, I suppose. Or he could be a spontaneously-generated bit of slime unique to some Danish slime pool. human 15:12, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

In which random people volunteer the details of their ancestry

Not than any of you asked, but I'm one quarter Costa Rican, one quarter Slavic, one eighth Hispanic, and three-eighths North/Western-European. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:20, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm approximately 40% English, 40% German and 20% Welsh. Rational Ed^think! 16:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Kewl, I'm 40% British, 5% Irish, 5% Italian, & 50% Hungaro-Russian... Lyra (Marry me, Jesse Eisenberg) 16:15, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Going back long enough, most of are Germans

You make our mother cry. Please, leave Denmark and never return. SHahB 16:25, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

You bigotted, jingoistic, nationalist! Rational Ed^think! 16:26, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

You just proved his point, Silly Human and his Bohdans. human 16:26, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Ok. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

False Dane

Screw you, infidel. SHahB 23:28, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

That wasn't a nice thing to say. :-( But I suppose that's the kind of simplistic abuse you have to expect from ultra-nationalists. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 07:34, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

Danse Fale

Hey, play nice, pastry-people. human 23:31, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

It should be pointed out that what, in the real world, is called a danish pastry, is known as a Wienerbroed, or Vienna Bread, in the Magical Kingdom. But then, the highest mountain in Denmark is called the Himmelbakke, or Hill of Heaven, and it's less than 200 metres high. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 12:53, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

I just sent you another insulting email

I just sent you another insulting email. SHahB 02:47, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

What about me? I never get any insulting emails (well, at least not from you). Won't you share the love? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:16, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Yes, I noticed, thanks. I'm sorry I haven't gotten around to replying to your hate mails yet, but I've been sort of busy lately. RA, I'm sure you'll get some hate mail as well if you just pretend to be a Dane for a few days. Here, repeat after me: "De ødsle søstre spiser rødgrød med fløde i Trørød." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:28, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

De ødsle søstre spiser rødgrød med fløde i Trørød.

Is it working yet? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 05:41, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, that's good. Now go put that on Shabby's talk page, and say something disparaging about Denmark while you're at it. I'm sure you'll see results before long. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:14, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

what does ødsle mean? I can get the rest... I assume Trørød is a town? I never did get to try rødgrød med fløde, but I miss those pølser... there's a stand just west of the town square in Esbjerg... mmm... Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 05:49, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Ødsel means wasteful, extravagant, and Trørød is a small village just north of Copenhagen. I must admit I'm not a great fan of pølser, which will probably only further support Shabby's belief that I'm a fake Dane. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 13:14, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

I have sent you yet another insulting email

I have sent you yet another insulting email. SHahB 00:23, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

Damn, how do I miss out on these wonderful missives? I guess it's because I am Welsh, and not danisH? ħψɱɐ₦ 00:26, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

I assumed Welshiness was bad enough. You probably send yourself insulting emails. SHahB 00:27, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

What about being biracial? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:07, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

Welshishnessness is not so bad, we're pretty and all, and talk funny. Oh well. ħψɱɐ₦ 03:48, 25 May 2008 (EDT)

Attention

Karlheinz, you are clearly failing in your attempts to make that Danish hero Tommy Seebach look bad. I am begining to think we might be on the wrong side. I listened to " Krøller eller ej " and was stunned by its magnificent glory. Such talent, and yet we mock him? For what purpose? To destroy the Danish spirit? Shame. Kaiser Kjeldsen 03:25, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Gott im Himmel, are zhey zending firzt-Jahr agent ztudentz out now? Zhey muzt be getting dezperate, Ja? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 03:34, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

So the truth has come out, eh Karlheinz? A German agitator? I knew it since the "we are all Germans" comment. You really gave yourself away. And what do you mean "German-European "? Are we Danes not Europeans? is this because we refused the Euro? SHahB 03:44, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Ja, natürlich. It haz alwayz been "big, eevil Europa" zhis and "ve haf enough in our own leetle backyard" zhat, haz it not? But you vill come around soon enough, oh yez you vill, whezher you vant it or not! Bwhahah! Bwhahahahahahaaah! *ahem* Sorry. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:00, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Never. Danish patriots and ultra-nationalists alike will fight to the death to prevent the Euro. Denmark is currently like a windmill full of powder kegs. The slightest German agression will lead to total war. SHahB 04:07, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

I fully ekzpect zhey vill, und zhey vill fail. Our campaign of zubverzhion haz been too zukzezzful. It iz too late now. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:17, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

We will not permit another European war.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 04:18, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

No need to worry, Madam. Ours is a project of peace, and these are merely the ramblings of a small, disillusioned fringe, out of touch with the mainstream part of the population. We expect the changeover to be entirely peaceful and, one dares to hope, perhaps even met with eagerness. Intervention by our dear friends in the US will prove entirely unnecessary, I assure you. Not that you'd be the one in charge of it, anyway. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:45, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Kjeldsen, your poll results are not only old, they are meaningless. 52% of 1,016 Dane adults and no margine of error? Puh-lease. SHahB 20:19, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

I have sent you a complimenting and respectful email

I have sent you a complimenting and respectful email. --SHahB 00:49, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm shocked and amazed. I will need a moment to adjust to this, but thank you. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:22, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm getting the distinct impression that Shabby is bi-polar, manic-depressive and/or possibly suffering from multiple-personality disorder. Or is it just that more than one person is using his account? Rational Ed^think! 14:28, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

War looms

[2] looks like you and your ultranationalist, imperialist buddies might have a fight on your hands. When are you leaving? --SHahB 00:51, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

You seem to have forgotten certain recent developments. I'm now a European imperialist working against the filthy Danes, not a Danish ultranationalist, remember? That said, given a choice between the filthy-but-still-marginally-European Danes and the not-very-European-at-all Canadians, I'd certainly prefer to see Hans Island stay in the hands of the former. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 12:14, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Oops. But you are still wrong. You are a German imperialist. Big difference. Europeans don't even care for Germans that much. Anyway, are you willing to take up arms over this? SHahB 12:32, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

No. I'm a secret agent, not a groundpounder. However, I have it on good authority that we may be shipping arms bears to Greenland soon to help them assert their sovereignty over Hans Island and eventually cast off the Danish imperialistic colonial yoke that presently oppresses them. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 13:53, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Also, your comment about Germans vs. Europeans clearly puts your cluelessness on display. All Europeans are brothers and sisters these days, and such divisions as you imply are entirely a thing of the past. Unita in diversitate and all that. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 13:55, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

You're clueless. It'll take more than sixty years for us all to forget your glory days, Reichsleiter. Stop spreading imperial German propaganda. SHahB 14:30, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

No, you're clueless, and living in the past, too, just like all the other ultranationalists. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 14:35, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

No, you're clueless and spreading propaganda, just like all radical imperialists. First you'll be posting Unita in diversitate, next Jedem das Seine and Juden Verboten. Open your mind. Embrace tolerance. SHahB 14:39, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

"Embrace tolerance"? That's a funny thing for an ultranationalist to say. Perhaps you're just a little bit clueless? --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 14:43, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

You're helplessly lost. I am the tolerant Dane. You used to pose as a Danish ultranationalist (a fringe group, but dangerous nonetheless). We frequently came in conflict here as you attempted to discredit all Danes by making them look like extremists. Then I discovered your ties with an influential imperial German organization. I am not, nor have I ever been, a Danish ultranationalist. I oppose Danish chauvinism almost as much as I oppose German neo-imperialism. Is that clear? SHahB 14:46, 2 June 2008 (EDT) Oh, and you're clueless.

I can see how it is in your interest to make that impression, but your actions speak otherwise - for instance, your predilection for spontaneous singings of the national anthem, just to mention one thing. As a matter of fact, I am detecting not just cluelessness here, but outright self-delusion, which, of course, is yet another trait often found in ultranationalists. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 14:58, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Patriotism and ultranationalism are not the same thing. Only a fool or a deceitful German would make such an outrageous claim. I am detecting Goebbels-like traits in you, traits often found in, well, you know. SHahB 15:04, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Indeed they are not the same, but it is a fact that ultranationalism often successfully hides its ugly face beneath the naïve and trusting covers of patriotism. One needs look no further than, indeed, Denmark for examples of this situation. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:10, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Thank you, but we neither need nor want to hear your opinions on Danes or Denmark. SHahB 15:11, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Yes, an unwillingness to listen to criticism is another trait that is indicative of a clearly ultranationalist worldview. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:16, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

I am not interested in anything a German neo-imperialist has to say. SHahB 15:24, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Would this exchange be considered either amusing or meaningful in Denmark? Rational Ed^think! 15:32, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Meaningful, no. Amusing? In... certain circles, probably yes. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:39, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Whatever. Keep spewing your anti-Danish hate. I don't care. The world will see you for what you are. An ultra-right, colonial fascist. SHahB 15:41, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Shouldn't that be a colonialist fascist? I'm not from any colony. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:43, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Correct. My mistake. Thanks for catching that. SHahB 15:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

(undent) Could I just have my danish now? My coffee is getting cold. ^{Exasperate me!}Sheesh!_{Not the most impressive contributor here} 15:54, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

embassy bombing

:( terrible sad, isn't it? Today we must mourn. SHahB 15:46, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:47, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Faroes independence

What is the opinion amongst the radicals regarding this new push for independence? [3] SHahB 14:47, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

There is not as much a "new push" as a long-winded debate that isn't really getting anywhere, but if the Faroese really someday decide they want their independence, they're welcome to it - I've never been a fan of "square-mile patriotism". I doubt such a state would be economically viable on its own, though. Subsidies from Denmark make up almost 10% of their GDP at the moment, after all. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:00, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Of course you think their state will fall. You forgot to bring up the "inferior DNA" argument. SHahB 15:07, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

That would be unwise, since we share pretty much the same DNA. But yes, I do doubt that they could make it on their own. Just look at the economic troubles they had back in the early 90's. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:12, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

You link me to Wikipedia? You're a true scholar, no doubt about it. And you do not have the same genetics. SHahB 15:15, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I'm sorry, but the economical history of the Faeroes is not exactly central to my professional areas of expertise. If you could ask me a question about medieval canon law or something, I'll be happy to link you to some less popular sources. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:17, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Right, I forgot. Your area of expertise is windmills, correct? SHahB 15:20, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

No. Isn't that your area of expertise? --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:21, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

No, we've been over this before. Many times. SHahB 15:22, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

What university do you attend? SHahB 15:45, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

University of Copenhagen. [unnecessary exposition]It might interest you to learn that we rank no. 8 in Europe and no. 54 in the world, that we have over 37,000 students and more than 7,000 employees, and that we consistently produce world-class research in a number of fields ranging from high-energy physics and biology to political science and history.[/unnecessary exposition] --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:50, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Are you sure about that? I can find no mention of you on the website. SHahB 15:56, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

That's because I attend under a cover name. Look for a guy named "Ralf Hemmingsen". --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 15:58, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Cover name. Brilliant. SHahB 16:00, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I see. You are claiming to be the rector. Very funny. SHahB 16:02, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Well, it all just seemed more convenient that way... --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:06, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

For the record, I am having trouble believing you. You said earlier that you were earning a degree from a British university. Then you were not in school at all, rather earning money. You appear to be a pathological liar, a textbook Danish drifter and there is a 96% chance that you have hitchhiked to the construction site at least once in your life. Or perhaps I have misunderstood you. Perhaps you really are a student at Københavns Universitet. I really don't know what to think. SHahB 16:11, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I can say with absolute sincerity that I have never once in my life hitchhiked, to a construction site or otherwise. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:14, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I notice you choose not to deny the part about pathological lying... SHahB 16:21, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Because you're clueless. Of course it's possible to earn money and study at the same time. And specifically, I said that I will be earning a degree from a British university at a point in the near future, not at the present time. So you see that you have not identified any discrepancies in my background story. Except possibly the one about being Ralf Hemmingsen. I agree that I may in fact not be him. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:27, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Nice try. "I am currently on a leave of absence from the studies in order to focus on earning huge amounts of cash. The studies will resume in the autumn'". How can the studies resume if they are going on at the same time (now)? You claimed to not be studying, now you claim to be studying and making money at the same time. SHahB 16:29, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Please try to think. I'm 'studying' in a general sense, because I'm enrolled at a university and pursuing studies in the long term, but not in the particular sense, as I'm not attending classes at the moment, but rather on a leave of absence. This should be obvious to anyone, and you have not identified any errors or discrepancies anywhere. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:35, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I am not familiar with this Kjeldsen logic. SHahB 18:29, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I wouldn't expect you to be. It takes years of dedicated study to truly master this unusual, but powerful branch of logic. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 04:39, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Right now I am taking a class: "Introduction to Kjeldsen logic". Yesterday we learned 2+2 really can equal five, if we work it hard enough. Or that might have been "Intro to Kjeldsen mathematics", I can't remember. I'm a scientist, so what do I care about math or logic? I actually hope to master the Kjeldsen branch of knowledge, someday. SHahB 20:21, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

I wish you the best of luck. As you have no doubt discovered by now, being a scientist really puts you at an immediate disadvantage in this field. Scientists are rarely able to put their training sufficiently aside to understand the convoluted and unorthodox thought processes involved here. But despair not - with perseverance, everything is possible. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 08:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. That was the main point Professor Tiddlywinks stressed in "Advanced Kjeldsen Epistemology". SHahB 20:06, 7 June 2008 (EDT)