Since other users revered edits to your user page related to a discussion

Say what you will, but I was not a "kettle of sexy parts" when I was a teenager.

Sounds so kinky when you put it like that!

i was a klutzy fool, "sexually confused" not in the way we mean today, but in the "i'm a geek, books are better than sex, why are the stupid boys always staring at my boobs, oh, D&D" type. ;-)

Sounds like people are expecting women to be virgins multiple times. I've heard that's possible, but it requires beating Skyrim, getting to level 80 in WoW, and getting 10th prestige.

eh, 'relative' virgins. You aren't supposed to have really liked sex before mr. X. You're not supposed to have been fulfilled by anyone but mr. X. You're not supposed to WANT sex with anyoen like the way you want it with Mr. X. Cause he can't actuallly deflower you in 2013, but he can build up something in his mind that is somehow akin.

Wow... How many people actually think this?

i don't know how many men it's normal to admit to sleeping with, so i won't divulge, but well over half has asserted some idea like this. or have been "upset", or "disappointed" i was quite um... autosexual when necessary.

The other half would be about as opposite from that as you could get. happy i came with some knowledge, didn't have hang ups, and said "this, here now!" when that's what i felt.

There seems in my experience, to be almost no middle ground. but i think that (the lack of 'middle ground') is right back to the hang up about sex issue. guys who are equally open about sex, love that you don't play games (unless game playign is on teh night's menu, heh). They love that you will show them what you like, and you ask them what they like. it's teh ones who think this - may i say, archic? - way, that are all possessive "I need to be her first something, or she's not worth it".

but, it's anecdotal, so who really knows.

It's why the Church condemns D&D

That explains so much, now.

LOL