What the fuck are you doing?
"This content is older than you" is not an argument for keeping something.
The funniest part for me is that he's been saying the exact same things for years. Changez le disque.
Even more hilarious is that he is concurrently in an edit-war over his unilateral blanking of a template he disapproves of.
I am not sure why fun:delicious is so important, anyway. Certainly if we had a fun article about being delicious, things that are delicious, and ways to become delicious, we can do better than an article with the most interesting part being an unrelated bad-photoshop picture of Michael Jackson and Pikachu.
If you're going to delete stuff based on your own socks' votes, can you at least have the common decency to clean up after yourself so we don't end up with hundreds of redlinks?
Genghis Khant is a sock of Tyrannis?