Conservapedia talk:This site is growing rapidly!
- No info about Vossy but I don't think that was vandalism. I think he/she must have meant 'pussy' as in 'filled with pus'.-- Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 15:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a BoN and I approve these stats *gets stats-boner* 194.6.79.200 15:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yet another nice analysis of wiki thingies by our resident stats fiend larron. Thanks larron! DogPMarmite Patrol 15:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- larron, that's great! I'm dying of laughter that I'm number 18 on the list and couldn't figure out how that could be until I remembered my USDA glossary copypasta for Contest 3. Stile4aly 20:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Move[edit]
Hi, I tried a different approach, instead of plastering WIGO-talk with pictures... larronsicut fur in nocte 14:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
aSK[edit]
aSK doesn't fit into the article, so I put it here for the time being:
Similar graphs for RW are a little bit misleading, as we are not - let's say - content-oriented. The following pics just include the namespace main, ignoring talk-pages, or even the namespace conservapedia:
Of course, there is another content-oriented site: [www.astorehouseofknowledge.info] But, at their current speed of generating content pages, they'd need over four years to come close to CP at its present state:
The 3 wiki plot (180-day moving average thingy)[edit]
Should it be plotted in log Y scale to have it look better? [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 02:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's the first one of a series (see here - normalized and here - 2007-2009). I've to get to the others, still. larronsicut fur in nocte 04:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Other article[edit]
This site is growing rapidly! is yet another deceitful phrase coined by the dazzlingly creative mind of teh Assfly. It is presumed that this futile attempt to advertise Conservapedia pretends to arouse a false sense of importance among Schlafly's herd, and encourage them to "keep up the good work", despite blatant evidence that CP is, in fact, not growing rapidly.
Here is the all of the other article with this name. - π 13:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
good article[edit]
but its still lacking in the lulz department. 77.68.47.134 (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Update June 2010[edit]
I updated some of the data. The main difference: all scales will be in months and not days. This makes it easier to compare the values with the data gathered by wikipedia, as they use months, too. larronsicut fur in nocte 12:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers. You win at stats. ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 13:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)