Conservapedia talk:Red Telephone/Gentlemen

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How about adding each one of these as their own sub page at Red Telephone? IE, Red Telephone/20080925 for today's? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:15, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

You missed part of today's post. He was talking about how we're stupid for thinking these are his opinions, he's just illustrating the opinions of evolutionists. Or something like that, I just read it and hit the back button. --Kels 21:22, 25 September 2008 (EDT)


I've just noticed something[edit]

"I would appreciate it though if you can get back to me when you have created an article that many people wish to read on your website."

Andrew Schlafly Perhaps? I.e., this, this, and this perhaps? Just throwing a bone out there. And this is without the immediately obvious Poe's Law entry point. — Unsigned, by: Armondikov / talk / contribs

Ken just doesn't get it. For the most part, people aren't coming here to read the articles. They're coming here to laugh at, and take pity on, people like Ken. --Edgerunner76Tah-daaaaaaah! 08:16, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
Surely you mean "going there" as in "going to CP for laughs"... though I suppose it's both. The CP articles here do indeed help people see the likes of Ken and Andy for what they are, the main bulk of the mainspace here is just for our own (the editors) amusement and for an exchange of ideas between editors when they don't feel that they're as knowledgable as they could be in a subject (as opposed to an intentional resource for the "outside"). ArmondikoVsshole 08:35, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, I guess I was a tad unclear. When I was talking about people coming here for laughs, I wasn't refering to our (mainspace) articles per se. I meant the overall general commentary we provided through the various WIGOs and TWIGOs and Talk pages in general. --Edgerunner76Tah-daaaaaaah! 09:08, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

TOC[edit]

Wwwwolf "notoc"ed this article, and I guess I can see why. What we really need to do is clean up the section headers a bit so the TOC is useful again. ħumanUser talk:Human 16:15, 3 January 2009 (EST)