User talk:Mei II

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>

, (new)

being useful

Your a jerk I wanted to be useful and not a wandal for a change! Mei is NOT useful!

How is it useful to make loads of pages connecting to me to some random facebooker? How is that useful??? -- Mei (talk) 02:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thats my facebook and I wanted to be you because Shyenne said your cool

If you make an account you can link to your facebook page. You can't steal my identity, though. I'm just not okay with that surprisingly. ^______^ -- Mei (talk) 03:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

(EC) Wow. How Single White Female can you get? This is creepy, troll. I'm really starting to believe that you're an Ed Poor sock drawer. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

No, no, don't give up your block power. I'm just playing with you because that's what I we do, Mei is useful.

I was going to give it up anyway. I don't think I need it. -- Mei (talk) 03:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

My ability to be useful is not linked to blocking powers. It is linked to my natural telepathy (obviously). -- Mei (talk) 03:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Lol, Ed Poor. Fuck Ed Poor. Fuck 99% of the wiki scum that block all of us. In fact, fuck shyenne for trying to become some of that wiki scum. I love you shyenne

Yo, can you rename me to User:Brianna?

Yes. -- Mei (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Mei is "hen" useful! SRQ girl (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

False memory syndrome article

could you have a look at the draft I did , and the talk page of the original and decide if my draft is adequate for now. ? If it is then please swap it over. I have added a link to the original article at childabusewiki. A nifty box like the one for conservapedia would be great :) Hamster (talk) 19:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

RevisionDelete

When this was introduced to the Wiki, it was strictly for the purpose of removing legally dubious disclosures of personal information. See here and here for background. ListenerX^TalkerX 20:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for making your case. The debate you have cited does not support your claim. RevisionDelete was introduced when we realized we needed to remove personal information, yes. But there is nothing to suggest it was 'strictly for [this] purpose'. It has been used since for other things. You must have noticed. -- Mei (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

I have not noticed it being used in any other manner and not promptly undone thereafter. We do not use it beyond disclosures for the same reason that we do not delete talk-pages; see here. ListenerX^TalkerX 21:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Sadly that page doesn't seem to match current RW policy. We also hide revisions for libelous claims now, for example. I should bring that page up to date some time. -- Mei (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Unilateral changes to Wiki policy are unwelcome. Was there a discussion about this while I was away? ListenerX^TalkerX 21:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

I haven't changed policy at all. As far as I know, Nutty Roux proposed the removal of libel for legal reasons. I think the discussion (I wasn't involved) took place mainly on email. -- Mei (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

The Konata stuff

Could you please start putting some licensing templates on this stuff, otherwise I am going to delete the lot. They appear to be the worst copy infringement on the site. - π 01:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello Pi. I have been thinking about how to attribute those images for a while and I believe they are actually impossible to justify. In a second I will delete them and upload original works. The quality of my work may scare you. This is a warning. -- Mei (talk) 01:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

How about we pay Kels to draw you some stuff? - π 01:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

The issue is, even if you draw Konata yourself, it's still a copyrighted character and potentially a problem. I think. -- Mei (talk) 01:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't think you can copyright a character per say, but if you drew something that looked like Mickey Mouse and you tried to pass it off as Mickey Mouse Disney would sue you for trademark violations. - π 01:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I wonder how they'd copyright an anime character? It would seem like a penguin trying to sue other penguins for being black, white and penguin shaped. --^{Ask me about your mother} 01:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Do you think my new Meiday.png is original enough? -- Mei (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Might be PD for ineligibility due to its extreme unoriginality, but is good. - π 02:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I will eventually have my revenge on Pi. Probably by baking him. -- Mei (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this, I know it is a pain. - π 02:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

It's alright, Pi. ^______^ It will motivate me to learn to draw legibly. Anything is possible. -- Mei (talk) 02:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Rivers Cuomo will be coming after you now. 03:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

(undent) I miss the usual strange waving thing, but at least this version looks like a super hero logo. --^{Ask me about your mother} 02:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Can anyone see the Madotsuki sitelogo yet? -- Mei (talk) 02:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I can now. - π 03:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Pi! I should've known I did it wrong. At least now I have Madotsuki to console me. -- Mei (talk) 03:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Didn't work for me. People shouldn't be using common.css to decorate their personal stuff anyway. ħuman 03:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey kid...

What up? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Mei is still useful, Mei just made a mistake. We all do. ħuman 09:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't go! I like Mei! Wisest educated Hoover! 09:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mei--

Dear Mei--

I thought about sending you an e-mail and then figured it would be better to get you a message on-wiki.

Your user page/comment in the Saloon gives me the impression that you're "leaving and not coming back," as they say. I hope you're only taking a short break and that we'll see you on-wiki again sometime soon. You do good work here (VERY useful) and make smart and funny comments--in other words, pretty much the perfect editor. Yeah, you dropped the ball a bit with the "delete" thing, but who cares? Not us. Certainly not me, not after my massive screw up a couple years back where I deleted the WIGOCP talk page and pretty much crashed the server. People (like Trent!) were angry, but got over it quickly. Good times.

Anyway, hope to see you soon under one name or another. Take good care.

Paul. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm similarly concerned. Mei and - are equally useful. --^{Ask me about your mother} 16:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Agree with both of the above. We all love Mei and we all make mistakes. But Mei is useful and you, Mei, also are one of the coolest people on this site. Do not go! AnarchoGoon ^{Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living} 02:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I never make "hey, don't leave" comments when somebody threatens to leave, but for you I make an exception. So... hey, don't leave! The wiki would be less fun without you. And whatever you did to mess up the wiki (I don't know, I've been away) 1. can be fixed 2. is a result of you actually trying to improve the wiki, most likely. The worst that can happen is that your name will become a verb, which really isn't so bad (in most cases). Corry (talk) 07:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I concur. A RW sans Mei would be a little (ok, a lot) less sunny and bright. I think this might e the first time I'm making such a plea, but please don't leave... we need all the otaku we can get!!! --PsygremlinTala! 09:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Same here. - is useful. You are not as bad a person as you think you are, lots of people here like you. Please come back. With sandwiches. ^{— Unsigned, by: Totnesmartin / talk / contribs}

This is sad and you all are sad. Who gives a shit if some kid makes a big song and dance about leaving? Grow up and get lives, all of you.