Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Unclean gentile hands shall hence forth never touch this page. Except for regular contributors, that is. You're okay.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="background-color:Gold; color:Black;">
+
<div style="background-color:white; color:blue;">
 
{{talkpage}}
 
{{talkpage}}
 
+
[[Image:Starofdavid.png|thumb|300px|center|'''This talk page is now officially part of the never-ending Jewish Conspiracy to take over the world.  We have enjoyed sponsoring you, and hope you enjoy your now properly Jewified color scheme.''']]
 
 
  
 
==Can I or Can I not...==
 
==Can I or Can I not...==

Revision as of 07:19, 22 December 2007

Archives for this talk page: Archive list (new)

This talk page is now officially part of the never-ending Jewish Conspiracy to take over the world. We have enjoyed sponsoring you, and hope you enjoy your now properly Jewified color scheme.

Can I or Can I not...

edit the page. I was able to revert the changes despite being locked, but now I can't make the vandalisim BETTER. Shame--Closer government 13:18, 17 December 2007 (EST) !!!!ONE!!!1ONE1!!!!!! DogP 03:37, 17 December 2007 (EST)

Religion's War on Reason

Moved to Debate:Religion's war on reason--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 13:40, 20 December 2007 (EST)

New sysop guide

I just started a rough version of RationalWiki:Sysop_guide. Please to all and sundry to make it a mob project and not just "my" ideas. humanUser talk:Human 18:21, 20 December 2007 (EST)

RW.info

When is this gonna get updated? I keep checking but nothing seems to have happened since it went up. What gives? *BeastmasterGeneral 10:17, 21 December 2007 (EST)

RationalBlogs

So, anyone care to help me beta test this? --Linus(plot evil tech) 15:03, 21 December 2007 (EST)


RW Christmas Party.

Any ideas?--Bobbing up 17:59, 21 December 2007 (EST)

  1. Work on War on Christmas article
  2. Enlist in the War on Xmas
  3. Get drunk tonight for the soltice (roughly 1 AM EST)
  4. Party like it's 1999
  5. Kill a tree for Jesus
  6. Get drunk
  7. Pick a random user talk page and have a goat party there

humanUser talk:Human 18:08, 21 December 2007 (EST)


One should remind people the location of each tradition within the modern Christmas celebration - from the day it was chosen (see Sol Invictus) to the Great Ashen Faggot that sits on the hearth (assuming its not a day when burning things is restricted because of air pollution in cities). Once one looks at what each thing that is celebrated, most of Christmas is pagan... not that thats a bad thing, just makes it easier to absorb into secular capitalism and Saint Nick Santa Claus. I bet Andy doesn't have a Chi-Rho ornament. --Shagie 18:13, 21 December 2007 (EST)
  1. Get on IRC
  2. Invade someone's user talk page once every 10 minutes
  3. Plan an RW convention (?)
  4. Change the wiki color scheme

Anything else? --Linus(plot evil tech) 18:33, 21 December 2007 (EST)

I am an insufferable killjoy, and as such am highly offended whenever someone wishes me a "Happy Holidays". I am offended by the very idea of people enjoying themselves with shameless excuses to party and get presents. SHAME! --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 160 edits! 01:40, 22 December 2007 (EST)

THIS WEBSITE IS COMMUISTS AND GAY

VCBCXVB— Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs


And i like it that way ^_^ GayAndProud 20:08, 21 December 2007 (EST)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! HOW COULD YOU BE PROUD TO BE GAY! ITS NOT NORMAL YOU HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED BY SATAN— Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs
lol.— Unsigned, by: GayAndProud / talk / contribs
PLEASE COME INTO OUR PROGRAM IT IS BETTER IF U ARE STRAIGT SUPPORT THE NAZIS — Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs
nO.— Unsigned, by: GayAndProud / talk / contribs
THEN U WILL BE THROWN INTO PRISON 4 NOT BEING STRAIGHT.— Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs
yeah, there's absolutely NO homosexual activity going on in prisons, nope. CЯacke® 20:14, 21 December 2007 (EST)
THEN U WILLL BE BURNED— Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs
Please sign your rants and please also, do not use all caps as it's distracting. Thanks. CЯacke® 20:18, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Think we're gay? Check out Conservapedia. They are wall-to-wall and up to their ears in homosexuality. --Edgerunner76 20:16, 21 December 2007 (EST)

NO THEY ARE A FOCE OF TRUTH I LOVE THAT WEBSITE— Unsigned, by: Love Gods Way / talk / contribs

Well, of course it's communist. I'm on it. (And so is this person.) --Linus(plot evil tech) 20:20, 21 December 2007 (EST)

And this one. ГдлессЛиберал 20:22, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I'm not a Communist! My username is just a coincidence. :) GrandSoviet 22:46, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I'm a social democrat, which is the practical iteration of commie gay/race/class/etc.=people love. humanUser talk:Human 23:58, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I'm something. --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 00:06, 22 December 2007 (EST)
I'm a communist. But not a communism-ist, if you follow me (more into the theory that the practice, I guess....) Also, not gay, but remarkably open-minded after a few good drinks. PFoster 00:19, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Gawd, I love my open-minded friends here on RW! I hear ya, bro! humanUser talk:Human 00:53, 22 December 2007 (EST)
I'm a liberal authoritarian, which means, if given half a chance, I will take away all your guns and drugs, force atheism onto you, and build large monuments to myself. Like Stalin, minus the fake communism bit :) --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 160 edits! 01:34, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Your evil. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi!
You're only saying that because my signature is longer than yours. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 160 edits! 01:41, 22 December 2007 (EST)
No, authoritarianism is teh evils. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 01:42, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Well, admittedly, my vision of authoritarianism only works with two stipulations: (1) corruption in the government does not exist and (2) beauracratic inefficiencies do not exist. Those are the only problems with liberal authoritarianism. To try another tack: if it could actually work, would you make the public dissemination of creationist propoganda and curriculum illegal? Why not? If an idea is clearly factually incorrect and/or immoral, then why allow it continue competing in the "marketplace of ideas", as if it were on equal footing with other, more valid ideas? I might add that both (liberal) authoritarianim and libertarianism make naive assumptions—authoritarianism's I named earlier, while libertarianism assumes that humanity will always be able to discern charlatanery from legitimate ideas, which we all know, is simply not the case. So, shall we agree to disagree, and both continue making our "perfect world" assumptions, Elassint? --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 160 edits! 02:06, 22 December 2007 (EST)