User talk:Smg87

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Smg87! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi . Nice of you to join us. If you'd like to know a bit more about the site please have a look at our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide.--Bob^{bing up} 14:09, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

Greetings, Smg87, and welcome to the continuously murdering dubious escape pod! Thank you for joining us! I hope you enjoy your time here. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:07, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

Hey I've only just noticed that your 'welcome to the' changes each time, silly me. Haven't really done much of anything here, but hopefully that'll change soon. Please shout at me if I do something wrong.

Like forget to sign my own name. Whoops. --Smg87 02:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

sysopship

as per prtocol, welcome to your new powers. Please use them agressively and arrogantly. Ace McWickedⁱ⁹ 22:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Testing to see if creative new signature change works... --User:Smg87^{talk to me} 22:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

And again... --Sean^talk 22:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Marcus Cicero

ignore him, he's a self-admitted troll. He goes around trying to get a rise out of people by insulting them, and pretends that he's an intellectual. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll ignore him. I just don't understand why he does it. On a completely different subject, the only topics I feel confident enough to write articles on are biology and music, but I can't always see how they would fit with the site's mission statements, and I can't tell jokes. Should I stick to red-linked articles? --Sean^talk 13:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

You could check RationalWiki:To_do_list. I'd be cautious about going to heavily in to biology though, since RW isn't intended to be an encyclopedia. It's pretty helpful to cover topics that are commonly misunderstood or abused. Embyronic stem cell research is a classic example of this. Getting red links out of the way is useful, but only if the resulting article is on-mission. In some cases, we may be better off just de-linking those things, or pointing them towards WP for a more encyclopedic description. --^{Ask me about your mother} 13:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you --Sean^talk 13:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Happy new year! --^{Ask me about your mother} 13:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't listen to Totnesmartin. He's just jealous that he doesn't have my considerable powers of intellect, wisdom, reason, or virtues such as honesty, clarity, objective goodness etc. They insist on keeping me in prison because if I was unleashed I would continue to point out the flaws in this website. I like to talk about the opportunity cost of RW being turned into a fascist hellhole which loves memes and shit internet jokes. Think of all the good people the site turns away every day by adopting this moronic attitude? MarcusCicero (talk) 13:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)