Difference between revisions of "User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope"
(→Please unblock Bohdan: Let the record show...) |
|||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:::No he isn't. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 01:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | :::No he isn't. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 01:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::Ah, I see, you unblocked him. I blocked him for [[:Image:Ames.jpg|this]], which is the most offensive thing I've seen Bohdan do in his time here. {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 01:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | ::::Ah, I see, you unblocked him. I blocked him for [[:Image:Ames.jpg|this]], which is the most offensive thing I've seen Bohdan do in his time here. {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 01:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
+ | :::::If anyone is wondering what that image was prior to deletion... well, it wasn't anything particularly exciting. Essentially, it was a short-sighted child. I'm not really sure why RA found it so offensive -- I can only assume he is being [[Fun:Euhemerism in the Nineteenth Century|facetious]] :) {{User:Chaos!/sig12}} 05:53, 26 June 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 09:53, 26 June 2008
|
Warning: This page may contain blasphemy. You can help it by burning in Hades. |
I have mocked you!
<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 21:45, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Did you just leave a very important message mocking me? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:48, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, and I did it again just now. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 21:57, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
I have left a message on your talk page
<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 21:57, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- I find myself growing annoyed... Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:01, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Why? Don't be mean :P <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 22:05, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
I have left a very important comment on your talk page regarding important messages on your talk page, with a new sub-header.
I have left a very important comment on your talk page regarding important messages on your talk page, with a new sub-header. ħuman 23:23, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
I have sent you a very important flan
I think my favourite part is writing these bits :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 14:36, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
I hate writing everything three times
I hate writing everything three times. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85
- What in God's name are you talking about? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:20, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Look at the edit comment -- that makes three in total. And be nice to my flan. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!85 15:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- A word in your ear:
C H A O S!
- <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 16:37, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
My name is better than yours
<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 17:39, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I reject that. Also, mine is original. You, on the other hand, would be hard-pressed to find any site that doesn't already have every variation of Chaos registered. So, : P Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 17:56, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I reject that. Usernames based on "radioactive [noun]" are quite common. So there. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:00, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- But they aren't snapped up quite so quickly as "Chaos"-themed names. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:38, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I've never seen any chaos-themed names before. And certainly none as outspoken as "Chaos!". <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:50, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Try registering on Gmail with any name containing "Chaos". I guarantee all the appealing and even just tolerable ones are taken. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:53, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- The exclamation mark makes it special! Chaos!! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:57, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I have to agree with RA here. His username is clearly more original. Usernames with 'radioactive' may be common enough, but a radioactive afikomen? I don't think so. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:03, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you, AK. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:04, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Heresy! Haven't you seen the advert where a disembodied voice asks a child what their favourite word is and they
saydeclare "Chaos!" ...? It's a classic! I think you're both missing the context. The subtle, subtle context. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 19:07, 23 June 2008 (EDT)- Can't say I have. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:08, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- So... the context is that you're a child? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- In a sense, maybe.
- Don't make me button you. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 19:36, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not that mean, RA. ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 19:59, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Heresy! Haven't you seen the advert where a disembodied voice asks a child what their favourite word is and they
- Thank you, AK. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:04, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I have to agree with RA here. His username is clearly more original. Usernames with 'radioactive' may be common enough, but a radioactive afikomen? I don't think so. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:03, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- The exclamation mark makes it special! Chaos!! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:57, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Try registering on Gmail with any name containing "Chaos". I guarantee all the appealing and even just tolerable ones are taken. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:53, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I've never seen any chaos-themed names before. And certainly none as outspoken as "Chaos!". <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:50, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- But they aren't snapped up quite so quickly as "Chaos"-themed names. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:38, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- I reject that. Usernames based on "radioactive [noun]" are quite common. So there. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!But wishing is not enough. We live in the real world where nothing does exist. We cannot just disinvent it. 18:00, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Belly button button button
Dancing button button
Peyote button
Aaaaaaah, that's better! ħuman 20:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- No, this is better! Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:56, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Button! ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 20:59, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Ending
Ingrate.:P Assfly kills his mother and is thus liberated. How you get there is up to you. It's dramatic gold, I tells ya. Gold! --Helena Bonham Carter 19:43, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Sandalism
You've made me very happy. ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 21:25, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Anytime. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
<3s
For being a great blog commenter and giving me nice compliments. Yay RA!-caius (decider) 22:10, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you and you're welcome! Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Don't forget to wash your hands! ħuman 00:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- There's a dog loose in the woods... Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT
- Royal flush! All in! ħuman 02:28, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- There's a dog loose in the woods... Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT
- Don't forget to wash your hands! ħuman 00:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
How dare you block me!
271 seconds? You truly are a fruitcake. ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 12:42, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- How dare you edit my talk page and leave a little red exclamation point by it! : P Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:44, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- I had nearly forgotten about them. How time flies.
- Isn't my new signature divine?? ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
12:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Actually, no, because it requires me to strain my eyes. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Aw. ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Once again, I have to agree with RA. It is... not very easy on the eyes, as they say. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:37, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- That's exactly what I was going for. Next, I'm going to make bits flash! ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:44, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Please don't do that. Think of the innocent children. :-( --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:45, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- You must embrace the chaos! ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- I embrace chaos on an hourly basis, I just don't want to have to look at blinking text all the time. That's so... mid-90's. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:55, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Embracing chaos in keeping with a regular schedule seems a mite tokenistic to me, Amaranth.
- And I was only going to make the palest colours blink. You'd hardly notice until your eyes start watering. ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 20:02, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- I embrace chaos on an hourly basis, I just don't want to have to look at blinking text all the time. That's so... mid-90's. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:55, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- You must embrace the chaos! ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Please don't do that. Think of the innocent children. :-( --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:45, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- That's exactly what I was going for. Next, I'm going to make bits flash! ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:44, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Once again, I have to agree with RA. It is... not very easy on the eyes, as they say. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:37, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Aw. ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
19:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Actually, no, because it requires me to strain my eyes. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Incidentally!
My signature looks right now (at last). Feel free to rhapsodise over its beauty. ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 13:09, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- You know, you're one of the few people here that actually uses a template for their signature. Aside from you and me, everyone here stamps the raw code. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:13, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- I know -- we are a cut above the riff-raff, RA :)
- It annoys me when Human does that, because on RC it looks like he's written quite a long comment, but then when I get onto the page it turns out to be ":)" with a gargantuan signature next to it. Transclusion, people! Don't make me sting you! ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
13:16, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- "Aside from you and I", not "me". :nods: --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 14:18, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- @ Mr. "[[User:AKjeldsen|'''<font color="navy">AKjeldsen</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:AKjeldsen |<font color="aqua">''Potential fundamentalist!''</font>]]</sup>": That's just nitpickery. The most important part of language (aside from the obvious one of communicating an idea effectively) is getting it to "sound right", emphasizing rhythm and flow. That takes precedence over unnecessary minutiae. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:28, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- Precisely! And as it happens, "you and me" sounds wrong, too. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 15:40, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- @ Mr. "[[User:AKjeldsen|'''<font color="navy">AKjeldsen</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:AKjeldsen |<font color="aqua">''Potential fundamentalist!''</font>]]</sup>": That's just nitpickery. The most important part of language (aside from the obvious one of communicating an idea effectively) is getting it to "sound right", emphasizing rhythm and flow. That takes precedence over unnecessary minutiae. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:28, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- "Aside from you and I", not "me". :nods: --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 14:18, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
Please unblock Bohdan
↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 00:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- But "Bohdan" (= SHahB) is not blocked....? ħuman 00:47, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- Bohdan2 is. ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
00:50, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- No he isn't. ħuman 01:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- Ah, I see, you unblocked him. I blocked him for this, which is the most offensive thing I've seen Bohdan do in his time here. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- If anyone is wondering what that image was prior to deletion... well, it wasn't anything particularly exciting. Essentially, it was a short-sighted child. I'm not really sure why RA found it so offensive -- I can only assume he is being facetious :) ↳ ↑ ⇨ ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ← 05:53, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- Ah, I see, you unblocked him. I blocked him for this, which is the most offensive thing I've seen Bohdan do in his time here. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- No he isn't. ħuman 01:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
- Bohdan2 is. ↳
↑
⇨
↕
<blink>▽</blink>
←
00:50, 26 June 2008 (EDT)