User talk:YOU SUCK

welcome to the lathering cow, you scanty cow. PFoster 15:34, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, YOU SUCK. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

It it possible that you do not understand the purpose of this site. Our RationalWiki:Newcomers's guide should help explain things.--Bob^{bing up} 15:55, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

In a charitable mood tonight, Bob? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:56, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Actually I'm just trying to follow our stated policy as set out below. (Do I come across as being too saintly sanctimonious? )--Bob^{bing up} 16:03, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

• Remember: unfunny vandalism is often committed by those lacking elementary interpersonal skills, often with a mental age considerably less than their physical age, and such persons should be pitied rather than censured. They are unable to make any meaningful contribution to society and are reduced to attempting to destroy the works of their betters. Do not be harsh, rather invite them to make meaningful contributions.

Nono. Keep up the good work. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:05, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

"Conservapedia is fact"

And I thought today was going to be relatively unfunny...
My sides... my aching sides... Sulk 15:59, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, technically speaking, Conservapedia is a fact, inasmuch as it exists (yet). --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:01, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I think we can take the sentence fragment to mean "Conservapedia's content is fact". Do keep up, Anders. Sulk 16:02, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

That is not necessarily the case. Remember, the text exists independently of the author once published, leaving it open to interpretations that do not take the author's intentions into consideration. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

You don't seriously believe that? No work, by any author, can be an independant articulation of their thoughts. Unless they're telepathic. More Daneish superstition. Sulk 16:06, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Certainly it can. They all are. The idea merely removes the author as a final authority regarding the interpertation of a text, under the assumption that he is not necessarily any less clueless about what it means than anyone else. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:10, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

You're going down a silly path here. I want no part in it :P Sulk 16:12, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm sure you'll be delighted to learn that there are people being paid good money to write books about such things. I might have become one myself, if things had worked out differently. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:16, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Doesn't mean it's true. Naturally, this is all conjecture.

And wrong, too. Sulk 16:21, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Nonsense. It's all based on rigorous, peer-reviewed research. All data has been fully released. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:27, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Wrong wrong wrong wrong. Sulk 16:27, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Now you're just displaying willful ignorance. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:29, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

It's more like willful disagreement. Sulk. 16:33, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

A disagreement that stems from ignorance - and quite possibly deceit! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:35, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong. Sulk. 16:38, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Your anti-intellectualism is so transparent. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:39, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

It is your side of the argument that favours anti-intellectualism. Under your silly "no-creator-has-understanding-of-their-creation" system, scholars such as yourself as excused from actually interfacing with the personalities behind what they study. You sicken me, sir. We duel at dawn. Sulk. 16:43, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh, very well. I believe it is my privilege to choose the weapons, then. I choose Bible quotations. Please inform your seconds. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:49, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I choose xkcd quotations.

<timid>What are seconds?</timid> Sulk. 16:52, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

No, see, you can't choose another weapon since I already chose one. Seconds are the people who go to the duel with you to assist you with weapons and such, carry your corpse away and inform your grieving relatives after the duel, and volunteer to take your place if you abscond before the duel. It's an old and timehonoured institution. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:55, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←}  ??esoohc ot teg *uoy* dluohs yhW .setouq dckx esu ot tnaw llits I

Because you issued the challenge. The challengee gets to choose the weapons. Old custom. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:02, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} .elbiB a dnA ."motsuc dlo" siht rof ecruos a tnaw I

I direct you to this primary source, left column, line 12 and following. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:24, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} .nuf eht lla evah snairotsih uoY .hpmuH

What calibre quotations will you use, AKJ? Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:03, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I was thinking of something from Hebrews. Or perhaps Ecclesiastes. I always liked Ecclesiastes. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:05, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Ooh, big guns then. I shall act as Umpire then. Gentlemen, the distance to be advanced shall be 12 paces, as opposed to the commonly used 10 paces, due to the calibre of the quotations in use. Gentlemen, please remember: the intention is to kill, not main, your opponent. And do please have some consideration for the ladies that may attend the duel - please do not cry, whinge, moan or ask for your mother, for it is ungentlemanly to do so. Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:12, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Me thinks Anders has been hanging out with Bahktin too long. Or reading Pale Fire, I suppose.--WaitingforGodot 18:11, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I may have read a bit of Bakhtin from time to time. Fascinating thinker. Don't think I've read Nabokov, though. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:36, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Anyone suggesting the reader is as important or more important as the Author must of course read Pale Fire. no where can you see such an ummm well, "unique" role of author/editor/audience encapuslated inside non-commentary of the same three dimensions in the so-called "real world". even the Internet is now part of Nabakov's game. ;-) And I'm sooooo glad someone else has wondered at the dialogue of the dialectic, which resides inside teh "voices, inside my head". hehe--WaitingforGodot 19:13, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Teh Dool

I shall wait here for the attendance of both opponents. I would advise both gentelmen to refresh their memories on the protocols, procedures and etiquette of duels prior to participation. Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:14, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

How is the victor to be decided? What will be the equivalent of "First blood"? --Bob^{bing up} 17:17, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} P: !t'nsi ylniatrec eH ?nemeltneg er'ew kniht uoy sekam tahW

Sir! You insult my honour! Only a duel can remove this griveous stain! Consider yourself challenged! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:25, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} >ecnerefer odeulc/<P: snoitatouq dckx eht htiw yrarbil eht ni ,soahC & KA esoohc I>ecnerefer odeulc<

Time, gentlemen. 12 guage Bilble quotations, fired after 12 paces advancing. You may advance on the drop of my 'kerchief. Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:27, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Gentlemen: are you ready to proceed with the duel? Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:27, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} .fo troS

I guess. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:34, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} P: nam yrtsaP

Good, then we shall begin. Gentlemen: take your positions back to back, in front of me here, so I may examine your weapons Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:36, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} ?sdraobyek ruo enimaxe ot tnaw uoy oD .ikiw enilno na fo tcetnoc eht otni etalsnart snoitcurtsni ruoy woh ot sa desufnoc ma I

Or our sources, perhaps? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:39, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} .ti ot ecin eb lliw I ?esaelp ,elbib enilno na em dnel enoemos naC .tnemom eht ta secruos yna evah t'nod I

Of course. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:43, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Mr Jeldsen: you may fire when ready!! Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:44, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Ecc 2:26: "For God giveth to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy: but to the sinner he giveth travail, to gather and to heap up, that he may give to him that is good before God. This also is vanity and vexation of spirit." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:46, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Good shot, that man! Chaos' turn to fire! Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:47, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} ".ythgimlA eht ,emoc ot si hcihw dna ,saw hcihw dna ,si hcihw ,droL eht htias ,gnidne eht dna gninnigeb eht ,agemO dna ahplA ma I" :8:1 veR

Well done that fish, well done! Mr Jeldsen? Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 17:56, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Hebrews 9:11-12 "But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:01, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Ooh, I say! Top hole shot, that, Mr Jeldsen! First blood to Mr Jeldsen for the inclusion of "goats" in his shot! Bravo, well done! Spica the Hiver ^{If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...} 18:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

_{↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> ▽ ←} .rereretluda nagap uoy ,hguoht ,staog oN .eno taht dekil syawla I ".ton wenk I hcihw ,em rof lufrednow oot sgniht ;ton dootsrednu I taht derettu I evah erofereht ?egdelwonk tuohtiw lesnuoc htedih taht eh si ohW" :3:24 boJ

Psalms 130:1-4 "Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O LORD. / Lord, hear my voice: let thine ears be attentive to the voice of my supplications. / If thou, LORD, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand? / But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:34, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

?

Pity those sad characters who have been brainwashed by the Assfly. Proxima Centauri 16:54, 15 July 2008 (EDT)