User talk:Neveruse

From RationalWiki

1. REDIRECT User:Neveruse

Welcome to RationalWiki, Neveruse! Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards. If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be. Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

So, will you never use this account? Heh... heh... sometimes my puns astoud me! :P ArmondikoV^{...I'll assassinate your paperclip!} 08:46, 30 January 2009 (EST)

That was the original intent. But, let's see how that works out... Neveruse513 16:41, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Whatever you just WIGOed has beern already been torched by TK. Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:01, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks, I'll get working on the screen cap. Neveruse513 17:04, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman 00:18, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Hello, Neveruse! Welcome to the hardly overthrowing autobiography! Are you enjoying your time here? RA ^pfhq 03:12, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Contents 1 w 2 You're back? 3 JPatt's "values" 4 Hello 5 Stop breaking my Wiki

[edit] w

I'm starting to think you don't like ListenerX somehow. -- =w= 18:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

He's a pseudoscientist and utter douchebag who gets a free ride to push his ridiculous and illogical beliefs simply because he has nothing better to do than defend them. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 18:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

In that sentence, 'push' means 'talk about'. Super. -- =w= 18:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

No, push means revert and go on and on and on until resistors give up. He's a psuedoscientist and will never stop trying to justify himself. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 18:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

1. That still isn't what push means in the real world.
2. 'never stop trying to justify himself' - Yes that's what people do.

90% of what he does is great. The other 10% is shit. He should be under various topic bans. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm really glad we don't have topic bans. -- =w= 19:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

(EC) Neveruse, I was not "gloating" in that section. I do not appreciate gothar involving themselves in politics at all, and I do not appreciate unsubstantiated accusations of article ownership. ListenerX^TalkerX 19:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Unsubstantiated claims of article ownership? You're fucking insane. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

He obviously meant 'unsubstantiated' in the sense that you didn't substantiate them. I can see your confusion. -- =w= 19:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Fuck off for a second Mei... That I would even have to justify these allegations, like there's anyone who cares who hasn't been witness to LX's ownership of the article is insulting. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to insult you. Stop being angry. -- =w= 19:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

It does make me angry that this douchebag parades himself around as a rational person, owns his pet article and defends it until no one else can stand it, then denies all of it. It'd be like me denying him calling him a douchebag until he actually trots out the evidence we all know exists. I don't see why I have to go through the motions when anyone who gives a shit already knows. The only thing "substantiating" his ownership of the article would do is give him another endless tangent about "ownership" and "cooperation" and "rationality" and somehow "Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem". It's his game to be a blowhard, esoteric douchebag. I'm not playing. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

zomg, how is Gödel involved? -- =w= 19:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

He proved that not everything true is provable. An esoteric point, yes, but an earth-shattering one.

Neveruse, obvious truths are much more easily substantiated than most. On the other hand you appear to have no substantiations whatever for your claims. ListenerX^TalkerX 19:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

EC I knew that part, I just didn't see the relevance. I should have guessed really. -- =w= 19:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

+ it's not that esoteric. -- =w= 19:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Like I said, I'm not playing your endless games just because you have nothing better to do. I'm thoroughly enjoying your delusions, though...You're just a rational guy who doesn't own that article! ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

If you decline to "play [my] endless games," if that is how you refer to the requirement that accusations be substantiated before being swallowed whole, I suggest you drop any further dispute. ListenerX^TalkerX 19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] You're back?

Good. 'Cause we need to have a word. I just got out of the POLICE STATION because of what YOU said to them. 36 hours in a freakin' holding cell, numerous interrogations--I'm surprised they didn't being out the cattle prod. Look, bub, a joke's a joke, but this has gone too far. I'm considering legal action unless you Cease and Desist. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] JPatt's "values"

Man you just beat me to it.. Since you commented your edit with "Still needs work", I took a stab at it. Tried to add some of that article's tone into the WIGO, because I found it fairly amusing how it basically went "Well they did honor the soldiers... but normally they hate the military and want to destroy America and rantrantrant.. If you don't think it's any good, feel free to revert. --GTac (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the improvements. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Please stop being a prick. Thanks. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I second the above motion. ArmondikoV^{...I'll assassinate your paperclip!} 20:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

If only entertaining you two was as fun as entertaining myself... If you're not having fun, find something better to do. Jesus Christ... ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 20:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Say that's great! Now stop being such a pain. Thanks. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't you have anything else to do? ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 20:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

"Ooh I was just doing it for the lulzzzz don't be so SERIOUS WIKI CABALL!!! LOLZ" is not an answer. Just stop being a prick. ArmondikoV^{...I'll assassinate your paperclip!} 20:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

That's funny cuz, uh...that's my answer. ignore or abuse. your choice, bitch. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

9am on a Saturday morning, fiancee asleep....so no, not right now. I'll do some gadening later. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Stop breaking my Wiki

....Or is it Human's wiki today? I forget. Either way, stop breaking it! Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 07:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Check the schedule, I think Nx babysits while Human is gone. Anyway, what'd I do??? ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 18:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

hhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaha nice! ħuman 07:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You know damn well what you did you did. Trying to place bets of 5 internets on the admin abuse page is against teh roolz and will result in you being blocked for an amount of time to be deteremined by the student advisory panel. AnarchoGoon ^{Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living} 07:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea why you think these people deserve the time of day, Goonie! I think the Lawful Jackals should ban, block, and draw and quarter this user for crimes against humanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ^{— Unsigned, by: Human / talk / contribs}