User talk:Gcolvin

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Gcolvin! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?. 21:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Phil. Trans.

I likely should have made it more clear in my first comment that Phil. Trans is an actual scientific journal. As it happened, I left for a bit and was unable to mention that until a few reversions occurred. - GrantC (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry

I apologize for undoing your edit. Though I was responding in good faith to what I thought was an unreasonable edit, I was actually in the wrong, while you were correct. I'm sorry. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 07:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I'm a newbie, so this was my first edit. I didn't expect it to be so controversial, but after a few tries it stuck. Of course now much of the article reads like the wiki is second-guessing the peer-reviewers of Schwartz, Stapp & Beauregard, and pretending to be better at quantum mechanics than the very expert Henry Stapp. When I have time I'll take it up on the talk page, since I find the current article a tendentious mess. Gcolvin (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Might as well get with the program

So you should view this fleeting world:
A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream;
A flash of lightning in a summer cloud,
A flickering lamp, a phantom and a dream.

The tools you may use to deal with it -- Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Gcolvin (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleting edits from page histories

Don't do that unless the edits reveal somebody's personal information, contain serious libel, or are otherwise liable to cause harm. Щєазєюіδ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 07:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I get it now, thanks. They were all my edits, each failing to fix the one before. I thought it was a favor to hide the mess away. Sorry. Gcolvin (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)