User talk:Femilisk/Archive1

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Femilisk! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

And remember, judge NOT ALL MEN! - David Gerard (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

I AM WATCHING YOU VERY CLOSELY ·Femilisk^FU 17:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I am correctly responding to the incentives of Femilisk - 22:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Signature fail. ·Femilisk^FU 09:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Much sysop. Very editor. So wiki.

You've made a lot of good edits! Which is why you're now a sysop. (There's a manual, but I don't think anyone reads it.) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 08:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

wow much demote very substandard such inferior so lowered ·Femilisk^FU 10:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Expanding templates

Please be careful which templates you expand (by adding the "subst:" prefix to their name in the code). Template:Stub, for example, is never supposed to be expanded (you did that in Scholarpedia). Thank you.--ZooGuard (talk) 09:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. Noob. ·Femilisk^FU 09:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Femilisk™

A long-term contraceptive! - David Gerard (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Next: one for men. ·Femilisk^FU 07:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't use contraceptives, I just kill men. ·Femilisk^FU 09:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Shhh... No Tears

Only dreams now. --Revolverman (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I like you. But who knows for how long? ·Femilisk^FU 10:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

question

do you plan to do lots of wikignoming?--Miekal 21:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Do I have to report to you? ·Femilisk^FU 22:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I smell tears. --Dgener8 (talk) 22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

What kind of stupid leaping to conclusions is this? Miekal was clearly approaching Femilisk to see if he could help with any planned wikignoming. Nullahnung (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Actually i was asking if they wanted ninja if the answer was yes--Miekal 22:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

ninja? :) ·Femilisk^FU 22:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Lets you mask yourself as a bot, traditional thing for those who do lots of catting and other gnoming.. basically, do you plan to do it enough to give you it?--Miekal 22:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

sure, I'm pedantic and I like putting things in categories. I was mistakenly under the impression gnoming means trolling. ·Femilisk^FU 22:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

alrighty then, just rember to turn it off when you're done--Miekal 22:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

is there a guide? I have no idea what I'm doing. ·Femilisk^FU 06:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sink or swim dearie. But go to your contributions page, click manage user rights somewhere up by block user, and you should be able to click bot for one you can change. then go do all the gnoming and when your done, just reverse the operation. --Miekal 06:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Aha! ·Femilisk^FU 09:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sidebanners

It's a general rule around here to limit the number of sidebanners on each article to one. Pick the one you think best describes the article and put it on, but try not to double up. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 12:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I did not know this. ·Femilisk^FU 12:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Rape culture/social justice

I absolutely do not contest the categorization as being incredibly social justice related, I'm not sure the change to the navbox is an improvement. Considering that most of rationalwiki's sex related articles are about debunking stupid ideas regarding sexuality, I got the impression that the sex navbox helps get more related ideas than the social justice one did. I mean, I don't care enough to make a huge argument over it, since it's just a glorified "see also", but are you sure that social justice is more topical to the typical reader? Ikanreed (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Seconded. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 15:59, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Revert it back. I have no strong opinions either way. :) ·Femilisk^FU 16:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

User: SL

Is that your sock, or are you creating signatures for other users as STEP TWO of part of some larger plan? Father Vivian O'Blivion (talk) 16:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

He just asked me for a signature, is that allowed? Not my sock. ·Femilisk^FU 16:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

He can ask you to do whatever the hell he wants. Go nuts. Father Vivian O'Blivion (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Cool. I thought I was going to go for two faux pas in the same day. ·Femilisk^FU 16:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

STEP THREE:: BIZARRE CULT LIKE BEHAVIOR.---Dgener8 (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

For the record, it's (S L), not SL 11:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

(Duly Noted). (Father) (Vivian) (O'Blivion) (talk)() (15:00), (28) (June) (2014) (UTC)

(Adorable) (both) (of) (you) (.)(.) ·Femilisk^FU 15:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Is there a name for this?

I remember that someone in a conversation I had on /r/ainbow (or was it /r/TwoX? Memory fails me) kept pushing veganism and communism as central tenets to True Feminism™ and those filthy Bourgeoisie™ were Untrue and Heretical™ Feminists™. While the entire conversation was a shitshow, I do recall someone calling him/her out on... something. I don't remember. Is there a name for this, when someone pushes completely unrelated stuff (such as the aforementioned veganism and communism) as central tenets to feminism? |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ ^{These abilities - and the charts for them - could deep-throat a sperm whale.} 16:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

No True Scotsman? I'm not sure of any other name... purists? I feel you want something specific to feminism, though. ·Femilisk^FU 16:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

(ec) A vegan friend posted something along those lines on her FB page the other day (I'm trying to find it) - something along the lines of you can't claim to be a feminist and not be vegetarian/vegan, due to the exploitation of the female of the species. Prolly NTS though. PsyGremlin^Fale! 16:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Feminism is a huge movement. I cannot know every nook and cranny. If they start making all these horrible no true Scotsman fallacies, well, I disagree with them. I do not believe in any kind of prescriptivism. These types of normative standards are not for humans, IMO. But really, it's less important to me than other actually harmful types of people like MRAs or TERFs. ·Femilisk^FU 16:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

What do you think you're accomplishing here Psy? 16:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

EC No True Scotsman is a way to dismiss people from your tribe who behave in a problematic way. No True Christian shoots up an abortion clinic, for example. Expecting feminists to match your dietary habits is just misplaced ideological purity. Father Vivian O'Blivion (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

So we agree? ·Femilisk^FU 16:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ ^{RationalWiki, did you kill Rita?} 16:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)