Christian economics
"Godot and her friends". I have nothing to do with their edits, nor they mine. earlier you were gripping on Ty. how did that turn to me. haha. oh well.
Look, here's the deal as far as I'm concerned, you started editing areas I'm both knowledgeable about, and very interested in, and in fact, rather "protective" of, as far as how we at RW present them. You come along and just write trite "nothing" about religious topics, and I'm going to say "ah, i know that's not real, it's an exaggeration, and not worthy of us". There is enough in the very real world of Christianity and other religions to be critical of, without creating fake problems.
When I read what you write about religion, it sounds like CP's writing to me. No depth, no shading, no sense of proportion, no sense of relevance. just "here's this thing I once heard and a source that backs me up".
Edit politics, or logic, or science, or history and you'll never see me comment, cause i don't know about those things. Or, take time, really research what you are editing, and make edits that don't require constant revision.
I'm not trying to attack you. I'm trying to work on a quality wiki, that I'm proud to link to.
Why did you take this out of the article? You accused me of exaggerating what’s bad in religion:- It's the fact that your first goal seems to be to dismiss religion and Christianity, and make them big bad and evil, even when you have to exaggerate to do so. I didn’t do that, I carefully explained that there are kinder Christians who give a left wing message to what Jesus is reported as saying. You took that part of what I wrote out.
Possibly because it contradicted the previous sentence.
Pretty much, yeah. I said so in the comments.
Here's what's funny, if that's an acceptable adjective. Look at what you wrote here:
Defined differently Christian economics is closer to liberation theology and argues that Jesus valued the poor, also Christians have a duty to share what they have.[1]
vs. what you just said: I carefully explained that there are kinder Christians who give a left wing message to what Jesus is reported as saying. You took that part of what I wrote out.
--- can you really not see how what you put into the article is nothing like what you just said here? You constantly miss things like "who is saying things" "what are they saying" and "why". Why did you not say "However, not all christians agree with this definition. Some, kindger Christians give a left wing message...." It suddenly explains why you make a contradiction. It explains who the parties are, etc.
You've said you're an academic. So read what you write, critically, as if you had not been the one to write it. Does it make sense as written?
- ↑ Jesus on Money This advocates a different system based on Christians sharing what they have, (Christian Socialism?)
The article, which I found today, is worse than bad, it is (was) blatantly offensive, and written very childishly.
Proxima, no one is "[finding] excuses to get at [you]" - I've been saying this for years now, nicely sometimes and not so nicely others - your writing style is awful and your anti-religious (especially anti-Christian) screeds are often clueless. Cleaning up after you on this wiki is a tiresome chore I would wish upon no one, and if we had the tools, I would have worked with them to exclude you from article editing here years ago. But we don't, so we have to repair the damage you do as best we can, and then endure your insults when we remove or discuss your incredibly poor (in general) contributions. Sifting through the crap you add to save the occasional good wikilink is a dog's job. ħuman 03:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- In what way is Christian economics] offensive or bad?
- To me it looks like a good article written to university standard.
- Incidentally I wrote hardly any of it, others notably Godot wrote most of it.
- That's not your revision but Nebby's
- When other people write it perhaps. Your writing, however, is on the lower elementary school level.
- And its not their contributions we're complaining about.
That's right, Human complained about someone else's revision.
I give up. It's like talking to a wall.
A wall that happens to be able to pass a Turing test.
In this same interlude it doth befall That I, one Snout by name, present a wall; And such a wall, as I would have you think, That had in it a crannied hole or chink, (Wall holds up two fingers)
"Well played, Wall". "Well shone, Moon".