Template talk:RationalWiki MainPage/About
From RationalWiki
I have no idea why the template is calling this an "archive". Maybe because it is already a subpage? I just used the template to get an auto link to /vandalism, where I just saved some juicy material from last weekend. humanbe in 19:52, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
- I already have that at User:Thunderkatz/pwnage ThunderkatzHo! 19:54, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
- I have to admit, this is classic pwnage. Follow who is making the edits. Its really quite humorous. Sadly, it got out of hand. Bohdan
- Sure was. And, ThKa, hiding it in your private archive is not the RW way! We archive the really good funny wandalism as a sub page of the target's talk page. What else are you hiding where no one sees it? humanbe in 20:40, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
- I'd anser that, but I won't. Especially as I see no way to avoid double innuendo. ThunderkatzHo! 20:44, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
- p.s. Don't let others know about your secreT Knowledge. Or I'll kill you once my coup is complete.
- Sure was. And, ThKa, hiding it in your private archive is not the RW way! We archive the really good funny wandalism as a sub page of the target's talk page. What else are you hiding where no one sees it? humanbe in 20:40, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
- I have to admit, this is classic pwnage. Follow who is making the edits. Its really quite humorous. Sadly, it got out of hand. Bohdan
By the way, wazzok is starting to be used in my head and may become part of my everyday volacb soon --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 21:14, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- My everyday volacb isn't quite up to the evenings out @ RW. My special volacb has blue trimmings & small diamanté buckles. Susanpurrrrr ... 21:21, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- Ooh, that sounds secksy! Will you wear it this weekend for us? human
21:43, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- Ooh, that sounds secksy! Will you wear it this weekend for us? human
[edit] Disclaimer
We have no need for the disclaimer - it is fairly self evident we are not an encyclopedia. AceMcWicked 03:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC) It has been reverted twice. Anyone differ? AceMcWicked 03:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- It says that already in the article RationalWiki, the one that is linked to about ten times on the frontpage, if someone can't work that out form there they are in trouble. - User =
03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's an interesting idea since so many people think of wikis as encyclopedic. However, I also think it is our angry Amish editor is trying to make a "WP:POINT" because his reading skills failed him and he blames us. And we sure as hell don't need to link to WP on our mainpage to explain what we are doing. No stinkin' disclaimer needed. ħuman
03:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's an interesting idea since so many people think of wikis as encyclopedic. However, I also think it is our angry Amish editor is trying to make a "WP:POINT" because his reading skills failed him and he blames us. And we sure as hell don't need to link to WP on our mainpage to explain what we are doing. No stinkin' disclaimer needed. ħuman
[edit] Accuracy
I actually kind of like ToP's version [1] ħuman
00:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] "And having fun doing it"
So - what does everyone think of that? Τe†rоиіαn what's a tetronian? 14:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well, Tommy's been here a day, so surely altering the main page is within his purview? I thought that part was expressed in one of the RW space articles, though. Oh, and it doesn't follow grammatically, it should just be "Having fun doing it". And it really shouldn't be there. ħuman
19:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


