Talk:Zhuchengtyrannus magnus

Delete

What's this for? SHITE. Thae creationism section is just there to justify having the article on RW. Zhuetcsaurus isn't even a transitional fossil, unless transitional forms between slightly different tyrannosaurids are on-mission somehow. Anyway, rant over, delete this. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Fine. Delete it if you want. I don't particularly care. --Danfly (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Deleted just now. Tottie was right, this was just a puff piece about an irrelevant dinosaur.

On an unrelated note, the way you formatted your references made me cringe; treating each page within the study as a separate reference was marvelously unnecessary. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)