Talk:Voice of reason

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Delete[edit]

Unnecessary, poorly written, redundant and just crap. Innocent Bystander (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Vote for Deletion[edit]

Yes[edit]

  1. (Copy of above) Unnecessary, poorly written, redundant and just crap. Innocent Bystander (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  2. I first tagged the article -it's redundant and stubby. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 18:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  3. Seems to be the first thing that popped into somebody's head. Everyone thinks they're the voice of reason, the mere fact that a few unreasonable people do so too does not an article make. SophieWilderModerator 20:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  4. So a few disagreeable people occasionally toss around a phrase, and that merits an article on said phrase? No. No it does not. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

No[edit]

Goat[edit]