Talk:Peer review

From RationalWiki

Any halp would be appreciated; I think this should be a very big deal page for us, and I need some real scientists to continue and build on the barebones I've set up.-αmεσ (blackguard) 18:25, 14 January 2008 (EST)

Wow, I think I wrote a stub (since I know whst it is), and I'm proud my sentence survived the move to it being a "real" article! Thanks for leaving it... human ^{why is there a weird line through the "h" in my username?} 19:09, 14 January 2008 (EST)

[edit] Cover story

Please do not archive this section

Could this be made into a cover nom eventually?-αmεσ (spy) 12:02, 16 February 2008 (EST)

• Looks good to me. Yes. Not quite yet - there are some empty headers down under creationism stuff - maybe they should just be removed? I'm going to add the template, and delete that silly "construction" template. human^ities 12:15, 16 February 2008 (EST)

I'll nuke the other sections.-αmεσ (tailor) 13:54, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Done. Thoughts? Could I get a peer to review?-αmεσ (historian) 14:29, 25 February 2008 (EST)

I iz in ur artikl revuwing ur editz! human ^{- over 12 edits!} 15:37, 25 February 2008 (EST)

I pee revued it, it seems pretty good. I added a bit in the intro. Let's get another of our "peers" to "reveiw" it before we "publish" it? human ^{- over 12 edits!} 16:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Reviewers plz!-αmεσ (ninja) 15:28, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Yes. DogP 21:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

C'mon, this is an important article - let's Cover Story it! DogP 12:30, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Dunnit! (after a spell check "reveiwer" indeed!) Susan^{Antichrist (the) am I?} 12:36, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

But that's my favorite wiki-typo! (Because "preview" is spelled correctly under every edit box for reference...) PS, I concur on the coverstorying. human ^{eats glue} 14:15, 7 May 2008 (EDT)