Talk:Macroevolution

From RationalWiki

I must protest. The joke at the end of the article is far too obscure for me to get!--Greenrd 19:54, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I know, its kind of random! I cant get it either! Elassint 20:01, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

 ? thought it was just me Susan^{speak your mind} 20:08, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I don't get it either. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 20:37, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Just went and listened to the song again. I enjoyed the song, but still don't understand the joke. --Kels 20:43, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

HAHAHA! I get it. Thats a hilarious joke. Bohdan 20:52, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Ha.........ha...... Locke ^{Always Watching......} 20:58, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I know my Beatles pretty well (my old gf will disagree) but I don't get it either.--PalMD^{-If it looks like a donut, eat it} 21:51, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

[edit] Contradiction

There appears to be a contradiction between two sections of this article: "it is impossible to have the concept of one without the other," yet "it is possible to skip the micro and create new species out of the blue." That section actually addresses macroevolution without microevolution, and doesn't directly support the creationist claim of microevolution without macroevolution, but the contradiction is bad. I have given a tentative rewording based on my understanding that each can occur without the other, but it is not possible for one to be true and not the other; what does everyone think? Wehpudicabok 07:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)