Talk:EvoWiki
From RationalWiki
I'm wondering what the point of this article really is. I followed the link to History of the Earth and it isn't even well-written. As in, it's badly written. So why do we care about this "not very active" wiki? humanbe in 17:48, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
That article was awesome, best one on the EvoWiki. Certainly more well written than anything on Conservapedia --Uncle J 09:13, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
- Everyone to their own. Better than CP isn't saying much, I've known four year olds better than cp. ;-) Susantalk to me 10:56, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
- A vandal attack just went on there. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 15:40, 1 December 2007 (EST)
Darn, the server is down. :( --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 19:30, 2 December 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, I came here to say something along those lines. DOS attacks work well if they're still on Siteground... human be in 19:38, 2 December 2007 (EST)
- It's working again. I even fixed the third person voice in their article on us (most of it was second person plural, a bit weird). human steadfastly refusing to drink the green Mowse-Ade 14:29, 4 December 2007 (EST)
[edit] The following advertisement was paid for by Proxima Centauri
EvoWiki is commonly vandalized by creationists[1]. Users who are sysops on RationalWiki may apply to become sysops there and help with vandals. EvoWiki will probably need some type of confirmation that you are the person you claim to be and not a Christian Fundy in disguise. Email should do. --Proxima Centauri
