Conservapedia talk:Fab Five

TK - sensible?

Is it just me or does TK come over as the most sensible in this latest batch? For instance, in 61-90/816558b127681c37 he attacks Ken's pisspoor "satires" but in CP/1-30/6ba433efe2265335.htm, Karajerk praises them and claims they're working. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 14:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Karajerk comes across as raving insane in most of these.However, there are a few posts where he expresses his objection to the Conservative Bible. --Ψ GremlinZungumza! 14:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

That's awesome! "What in the world is going on with Conservative? "Hispanic ladies"? More Hitler pictures? It is getting pretty ridiculous". No shit. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 14:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

So anyway, when do we start out nice "selected snippets" section? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 14:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, the basic article is here, feel free to add a "comments by" - like we did with TZB. --Ψ GremlinParlez! 14:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I think we need a whole page just for Kara's insane paranoia and threats to report people to their employers. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 14:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Karajerk's paranoia is hilarious, and I still wonder how Geo.Plrd can walk upright without a spine. It's also funny to see that Hurlbut even spams his money-making links directly at his fellow sysops. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 14:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

RJJensen

Well now we know exactly why he left: Fab Five/121-150/79543b21c409fc70.htm –SuspectedReplicant retire me 15:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I take my hat off to the man "oh come on TK you're a mall cop, not an encyclopedist" & "It's a pain to see a bully who has never written any actual content try to rule an intellectual enterprise by means of a billy club and a gallon of white out." --Ψ GremlinParlez! 15:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ah, the good ol' days. Karajou is pretty classic there, too. Occasionaluse (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

IP Block Log

Can someone have a look at 301-330\a6d329198f6284cc? TK seems to be implying that out block log is made up of our own IPs rather than IPs of BoN vandals / spambots? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 15:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

More DeanS stupidity. --Ψ GremlinSermā! 16:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Philip Beach III

Who's this? Every time there's a server problem this guy pops up and says they've fixed it (e.g. 331-360\425ba8c02f5d80b1). It's not PJR is it? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 16:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

No, he's CPWebmaster. He does the tech stuff for the Assfly. I can't imagine why. Maybe they pay him. --JeevesMkII ^{The gentleman's gentleman at the other site} 16:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

The missing minutes

What I always want to see when the various CP discussion groups get leaked (as they seem to do with monotonous regularity) is what goes on behind the scenes when the CPites wake up and realise we're all privy to their conversations.

After this time, I get the impression it's going to be less "oh shit, panic!" and more "not again!" But it'd be nice to find out. --JeevesMkII ^{The gentleman's gentleman at the other site} 16:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to see what they say about TK; I honestly can't think of any other way Psy could have got these. EddyP ^{Great King! Disaster!} 16:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Rename

Instead of having this just for the Fab Five discussions, why not rename it so we can include quotes from both mailing lists? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 10:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Because we have Conservapedia:Conservapedia Group for that one. Once people get excited and start adding things it will get very long. - π 11:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)