User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope

This user thinks these floating boxes are retarded.

About me Talk to me Proper goddamn use of punctuation Stuff by me Handy stuff

Warning: This page may contain blasphemy. You can help it by burning in Hades.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>

, (new)

See the history of vandalism to this article

Yay!

We meet in th'middle. Pink_{("Th" is a word.)} 15:50, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:51, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Quite. Pink_{(Astronomy something)} 15:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:58, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

As you say. Pink_{(Domine, you miscreant)} 16:02, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Eric Clapton.

It's people like you what cause unrest. Whatever happened to all the fun in the world? PFoster 23:44, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

I am having fun. I really don't care about the Eric Clapton article, I just enjoy playing with you. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:47, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Difference between vandal and vcat

What is it? PFoster 00:38, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

"Vcat" adds the user to the vandals category. Additionally, Template:Vandal is kind of, er, showy. My impression was that it was created to be a badge of pride, rather than a condemnation, which is what vcat is. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:06, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

And then there's the "vandal" usergroup, which limits their edits... ħuman 01:14, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Help for teh sysop

Fred Phelps is seeing a lot of wandalism, and I wanted to protect it because most edits have not been productive, only problem is when I saw the protection history someone says "we don't lock articles." What's the deal with this? MIP has actually signed in - 18:51, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Unfortunately, RationalWiki does not even have a policy regarding protection. We do have a vague community consensus that locking pages is to be avoided as much as possible. After all, this is a wiki, so any damage can be undone with the click of a button. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:49, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

I realize that probably wasn't very helpful. I suggest you propose page protection on the talk page, and make an argument for locking it there. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:49, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Nah, I read you loud and clear. And I do realize that in the case I was questioning blocking the Fred Phelps page, it would have been easier to block all the defective wandals (along with the help of fellow sysops) and leave it unlocked. Thanks. MIP has actually signed in - 00:25, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Hehe, yeah, except we also try not to bother blocking people, either. There are so many of us and so few of them that vandalism rarely lasts more than a few minutes. ħuman 01:53, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

But it's so fun! MIP has actually signed in - 17:49, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

So block other sysops, lock your subpages, or - go get your rocks off an a wiki with a power structure... if that's what you really need? (Which I doubt). ħuman 04:35, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Of course not. In hindsight, it's more fun to block vandals repeatedly for short periods of time than one long block. MIP has actually signed in - 18:10, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Demotion

Thanks for the mop. Corry^{Baby, you got a stew going.} 00:43, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

You're welcome. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:06, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Wait a moment... didn't I give you a toilet scrubby? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:06, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

I got the toilet scrubby. I traded it in for a minigun, because you can clean toilets (or at least reduce the number of toilets that are dirty) with a minigun, but you cannot shoot bullets at a firing rate of 6000 rounds per minute with a toilet scrubby.

At least, not the kind you gave me... Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 01:07, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

In case you haven't noticed, the community here is very pro-gun-control. You may want to hide your minigun. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:10, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

I have all the relevant permits and I keep it trigger-locked and in a gunsafe when not in use. Also, it is only for hunting purposes. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 01:14, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Hunting what? Mosquitos? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:16, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

I always think I'm hunting big game, but what I actually shoot turns out to be some sort of red mist. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 01:22, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps, it was a big game animal, until you hit it with 100 rounds per second? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:25, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

As long as between misty episodes, it is safe from minors who might want to play "videogames" with it, it's cool. Where do I trade my mop and buckitts in for a minigunz or twelve? ħuman 01:41, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

I know of no gun shops on-wiki. I suggest you ask gun-runner Wazza where he got his. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:44, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Where do you think I got it? Conservapedia! I was quite shocked that they did not check my license or put me through a waiting period, though. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 01:46, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

I think another good source would be the sekrit skwirrel guy. He seems to know his shit in that regard. Check tomorrow's newspapers!!! Oh, wait, I promised to play "safe". nevermind. From the home of the Live Free or Die! ħuman 01:48, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Congratulations! It only took you one and a half weeks to notice! Hooray for the callous and brain dead tyrant Human!

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Pink&curid=16547&diff=253208&oldid=253199

So you just do what you want? Blanking talk pages at will? And when I happen to run across it, I am "~"?

Do you think there might be any ad hominem attacks in the edit comment I copied as the topic line? I didn't "miss" Pink, to tell you the truth, because all it did was angry talk and the song war with AKjeldsen (which was funny). IE, I wasn't curious as to its latest opinions, since it was mostly an attention whore. ħuman 02:47, 27 October 2008 (EDT)