Difference between revisions of "User talk:Opcn"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Removing TK's name: new section)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
::::::::::Somehow, I'm disinclined to trust the word of a single BON as grounds for promotion.  Otherwise, socks claiming to be admins would be vandalizing all over the place due to the petty vendetta ''du jour''.  --{{User:Theautocrat/Sig}} 03:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::::::::::Somehow, I'm disinclined to trust the word of a single BON as grounds for promotion.  Otherwise, socks claiming to be admins would be vandalizing all over the place due to the petty vendetta ''du jour''.  --{{User:Theautocrat/Sig}} 03:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 
(undent) I only blocked anonymous contributions, you can log in or even create an account if you like. --[[User:Opcn|Opcn]] ([[User talk:Opcn|talk]]) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 
(undent) I only blocked anonymous contributions, you can log in or even create an account if you like. --[[User:Opcn|Opcn]] ([[User talk:Opcn|talk]]) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Removing TK's name ==
 +
 +
I know you are a fan-boy of his and have been having your little chats, but it was agreed after a very lengthy debate that his name would remain in articles. {{User:Π/Sig|}} 02:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:03, 28 January 2010

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Opcn!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Traditionalism

Speaking of "people still upset, more than forty years later, about translating the liturgy into the vernacular", as mentioned here, it might interest you to read up on Traditionalist Catholicism. :) --Marty 07:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Traditionalists believe men look good in tiaras.

Sysopship

Welcome to the life of a janitor. The basic rules are, don't block anybody that is not a sysop. Use the vandal bin on vandals and only when they are actually making a mess of the site, page blanking etc. Don't delete or lock a page without first discussing it on the talk page, simple enough. We don't protect much so you won't need that. Hide/Show is only for hiding person information like home phone numbers, address etc. If you use it inappropriately you will here from me soon enough, I check over the log occasionally and yes I have that little to do. Don't edit others talkpage comments or remove threads without archiving, that includes this page which we are all allowed to defecate on. Please read RationalWiki:community standards and RationalWiki:sysop guide. A simple rule tell someone what you are going to do before you do it, so we are not all left wondering why you deleted the main page. Good luck. - π 04:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I lolled at your "new sysop instruction guide". ħumanUser talk:Human 05:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
In order to avoid the dreaded "Ping-ponging" I'll say thanks here, Thank you :). I also vehemently deny being or ever having been Colin James Hallock :) --Opcn 05:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
I did however play a CJHallock on CP --Opcn 16:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

"TK Blocked Me!"

Gosh, sorry! If only I had known it was you, a serious conservative/Christian person, I wouldn't have. But I am confident that you will be back again.... --TK/MyTalkEditor 23:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello

I'm the booby vandal. I'm not quite sure why you blocked me? I thought this site appreciated funny things and I can't think of anything funnier than boobies. Am I wrong? 69.162.107.250 (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

While we do appreciate a good joke now and then, going through and writing "boobies" everywhere is not, in my opinion, very funny. Now, if you could find a way creatively to post that in places where it isn't just the same shit repeating over and over again as the joke, but rather something a little more intelligent, we'd actually laugh (or, at least, smile). Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 02:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
What if I told you I am an admin here and I'm just using proxies to cause trouble? Would you revoke my admin privileges? 69.162.107.250 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
ABSOLUTELY!!! Seriously, I think I'm beginning to smell something nutty now. Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 02:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
And, no, as I would classify this under "not funny" to "funny", as opposed to "unfunny". The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 02:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, I'm bored now. I am an admin here but not one you would recognize (since everyone is an admin). You were the one who demoted me! 69.162.107.250 (talk) 02:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hmmmmm, you've got me intrigued! Reveal yourself, please!!! You have piqued my interest. The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 02:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I promise that you don't know me, so revealing myself would be a major disappointment. I'm just a troublemaker, that's all. 69.162.107.250 (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I don't think he should be promoted for his vandalism, I think he should be promoted for his stupidity. How does any of this make sense? - π 02:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
(EC)Troublemakers are good now and then. If you had actually revealed yourself, I'd have bowed down to you as God, lol. Since you won't, cheers anyways. Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 02:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Somehow, I'm disinclined to trust the word of a single BON as grounds for promotion. Otherwise, socks claiming to be admins would be vandalizing all over the place due to the petty vendetta du jour. --User:Theautocrat/Sig 03:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

(undent) I only blocked anonymous contributions, you can log in or even create an account if you like. --Opcn (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Removing TK's name

I know you are a fan-boy of his and have been having your little chats, but it was agreed after a very lengthy debate that his name would remain in articles. - π 02:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)