Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Archives
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{{AOTW Navigation}} | {{AOTW Navigation}} | ||
Add your observations on what is happening at [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] here. | Add your observations on what is happening at [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] here. |
Revision as of 17:35, 15 April 2010
Template:AOTW Navigation Add your observations on what is happening at A Storehouse of Knowledge here.
Same rules as WIGO CP. New items at the top, archive when it gets big.
Always be wary of Poe's Law - if something seems too outrageous to be true, it often is. If you see an entry that you think is questionable add {{poe}} to it.
If you decide to join up there, you might want to consider signing the RW Moles Declaration.
What is going on?
April 2010
5 | Not got enough power to sort them nasty evilutionists? Give youself "check user" Bradley |
2 | Philip channels Andy and adds deceit to the "creation-evolution controversy" "article." |
March 2010
1 | "Choosing to reject evidence simply because you don't agree with the people highlighting the evidence is not a rational argument." Whereas believing the words of a primitive society's priesthood is? |
-15 | ASK takes on a decidedly more commercial toneimg. |
6 | Phillip lays it all on the table: I'll deal with reality when I have some reality to deal with. |
1 | aSK has made a further departure from the reality-based community. |
-10 | Revert and Infinite ban # (Block log); 16:59 . . OscarJ (Talk | contribs) blocked Someone (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) (Abusing multiple accounts) |
0 | PJR: I never said that evilutionists shouldn't give creationists short shrift. PJR has rather a short memory. |
2 | PJR does some stand-up comedy: "Science should explain what happened without ruling out a particular agency a priori." |
3 | Following blocks of Teh Terrible Asp, Jeeves, and Editor at CP, PJR announces a new policy at aSK: Insults with "no merit" are to be burned on sight. |
1 | PJR: Bigoted comments disputing that CMI personnel are scientists are disallowed. |
2 | Remember, Philip is an honest man. Therefore, this is not lying by omission. |
3 | March 7: Teh Terrible Asp posts a warning to fellow editors. Two days later, PJR notices it: Revert and one-week block. UPDATE: Jeeves puts up the same text, but only gets three days. |
1 | PJR: Conclusions that are based on the evolutionary worldview are disallowed in articles. Or, in English, science is verboten. |
0 | Old-earth creationist view of origins: Trolling. UPDATE: Comment restored by, of all people, OscarJ. |
2 | PJR: The be-all-end-all of communism was to spread atheism. |
0 | Oh,look. Daniel1212's given us a lovely new |
3 | The |
February 2010
7 | Is this what they call a teachable moment? |
8 | No true Scotsman! Extra Value Sure, they've got God and heaven and Jesus and the Bible, but they don't agree with me, therefore they're not really Christian. |
12 | That's an awful big setup just to say "I'll swallow any sciency-sounding rubbish CMI wants to shovel down my gob." |
8 | Christianity is the same all over the world! |
5 | Philip finally gets it! A bit passive-aggressive and childish, but at least he's on the right track. |
5 | "... the Garden of Eden is not a myth!" sayeth the prophet (Phil). |
16 |
January 2010
-10 | My parting comments to Philip and his cesspool of a site [1] . |
5 | I'm not accusing respected scientists of corruption nor deceit nor sloppiness, except that's totally what I'm doing. |
-11 | Maybe it really is all over? I mean seriously, click this link. Go ahead, go ahead, click it, I'll wait right here. Oh my <expletive deleted>, see what I mean? |
6 | PJR: I never did science beyond high school, but I know more about it than every scientist in the world. It's all in the Bible, you know! |
-5 | LowKey: It is impossible for Jesus to demean any human being. One would think that, being the incarnation of an omnipotent God and all, Jesus could lower anyone's character, status, or reputation. |
-7 | HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA... ...urrkk!!! By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed laughter can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record. |
4 | A little bit more like Conservapedia every day. |
1 | Bit of advice Philip, it helps if you give good answers, rather than just regurgitating CMI. |
1 | Has anyone ever told you you're sexy when you channel TK, Philip? |
1 | What are the rules for conflict of interest on aSK, anyway? |
4 | Collaboration, the |
5 | The Great Flood wasn't genocide, you're just hating on god. The only reason someone would attempt to associate it with God would be to imply that He is evil and unjust. Yup! |
2 | Dishonesty reigns supreme! Surprised? |
4 | Ken doesn't like people badmouthing his boyfriend. |