User talk:Bob M/Lenski

Can anybody think of a good title for this?

Not at the moment. Shouldn't it be genetic "engineering" rather than engendering? Genghis^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 06:12, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

So! Suddenly you know more than my spellchecker?!!! Seriously - thanks. If you want to edit please go ahead.--Bob^{bing up} 06:19, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Spellcheckers only check spelling not meaning and context. I'm reluctant to change stuff in personal userspace as I don't always know enough about a subject to be confident in editing it, and it is private area so unless there's an explicit "Help Me" sign I usually take it to talk. Genghis^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 06:37, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Evolution examples & link from evolution#Evidence for Evolution?   ^Contribs_Talk 06:41, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

On the subject of checkers: stick a comma in "Seeing many of their favorite myths so clearly under challenge creationists mounted a challenge" after challenge please.   ^Contribs_Talk 06:41, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

(Comma added - thanks) I really want "Lenski" in the title as my objective is to explain why Lenski's work is such a significant challenge to creationists.--Bob^{bing up} 07:02, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Lenski bacterial evolution?   ^Contribs_Talk 07:14, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks, but it's not quite what I'm after. My first thought was Lenski's results and why they are a challenge for creationism but that's too long. How about - Lenski results challenge creationism. I know it's sounds more like a newspaper headline, no doubt if it's bad then it'll get changed.

Hey Bob, why don't you just relocate the page rather than creating a new version? Genghis^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 07:30, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

That would have been more sensible, wouldn't it? Ha well. Not concentrating I suppose.--Bob^{bing up} 07:35, 25 June 2008 (EDT)