User talk:98.17.61.6
Please at least discuss the edits you want to make to New World Order on its talk page, or you are unlikely to be taken seriously. Even better, create a user name and tell us a bit about who you are, and join in the rest of the fun here. IPs that consistently focus on and revert one article are liable to end up being thought of as vandals or trolls rather than members of the mob. human 13:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- If you want your edits to stand it would be a good idea to discuss them on talk pages first. :-) I wouldn't want to block you but unless you are prepared to discuss your point of view blocks may start to appear.--Bobbing up 13:56, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- I just blocked the annoying IP for the above reason (constant editing out refs to GW without discussion) for 3141 seconds (about an hour). human 13:58, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Yes, my warning and your block crossed. It's a shame he won't (or can't) articulate his case. Still he's only down for an hour. Plenty of time to think his case through.--Bobbing up 14:02, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- But my block did not cross my earlier warning above. IP also has a history of blocks, and has made no effort to state their case or justify their edits. Elassint is in danger of crossing the same line, and hopefully will be more active on talk pages soon. human 14:10, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Yes, my warning and your block crossed. It's a shame he won't (or can't) articulate his case. Still he's only down for an hour. Plenty of time to think his case through.--Bobbing up 14:02, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- I just blocked the annoying IP for the above reason (constant editing out refs to GW without discussion) for 3141 seconds (about an hour). human 13:58, 7 November 2007 (EST)
You've been blocked once. Please explain your logic on talk pages before deleting material from article pages.--Bobbing up 18:41, 7 November 2007 (EST)
Its seems you never read your own talk page anyway, but...[edit]
...just out of curiosity, have you ever read State of Fear by Michael Crichton? On another note, get yerself an account already! You've certainly become enough of a character by now, why not have a name as well?? Uchiha 19:41, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Hard to imagine he simply ignores the big orange banner saying "you have new messages". Although he might. human 19:51, 7 November 2007 (EST)
PILLOCK[edit]
You are an infantile little pillock aren't you? Susanmiaouw 20:00, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Well, his last round of freshly braised pillockism cost him just over 8 hours in the pillock stocks. human 20:07, 7 November 2007 (EST)