User:Kauri0.o/sandbox

Barefoot Technique

Biomechanics

Heelstrike but with rocking action under feet

Midfoot strike/forefoot strike at higher speeds

Spring action

No horizontal/braking force

Reduced impact force

Increased stride rate, reduced stride length

Reduced ground contact time

Greater dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (ie flexing of your foot) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17461391.2019.1603327?src=recsys&journalCode=tejs20

Toe splay improves gait

In fact, around 50% of runners are injured each year, and around 25% of runners are injured at any given time. About 70%–80% are due to overuse, mainly involving the knee, ankle/foot, and lower leg. On the contrary, Barefoot runners demonstrate how impact forces can be reduced in heelstriking, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dlieberman/files/2012c.pdf

The most studied aspect of barefoot technique is the foot strike. Common footstrikes are heelstrike, forefoot strike and midfoot strike.

Heelstrike

Over 90% of recreational runners heelstrike, landing on the heels of their feet. Heelstrike typically sends a shock wave through the body, resulting in greater peak impact forces on landing, which are transferred through the knee and hip. This is exaggerated by modern shoes, which commonly add 10mm or more of heel cushioning which slightly dampen these forces and slows the rate of loading, making it comfortable, and make it hard utilize any other technique. Barefoot runners also demonstrate heelstrike at lower speeds, where impact forces are lesser. Utilizing a rocking technique can also minimize impact forces from heelstriking.

Modern Shoes

Heelstrike

Cushioning

Pounding

Horizontal braking

Cramping toes, change in foot shape, deformation

Muh foot support / arch support

Good fucking marketing

Lazy body won't do more than it needs to

Despite the size and dominance of the shoe industry, there is no evidence that running shoes reduce injury or supports foot health. This contradicts widespread, common belief.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07868-4

https://journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/fulltext/2017/11000/foot_structure_and_function_in_habitually_barefoot.18.aspx

Minimalist shoes

Heel to toe drop

Traditional running shoes - > 8mm drop

Minimalist shoes - 1-8mm drop

Barefoot shoes - zero drop

Increased foot strength in minimalist shoes https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19424280.2019.1606299

Lightweight

Toe box, toe splay

Warnings

Progress slowly

Using muscles you have never used in your life and they will hurt

Stress fractures

Benefits

Fewer common injuries such as knee and heel pain https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26130697/

Lightweight. Reduced energy consumption.

Heightened awareness

Strengthening of feet muscles

Misconceptions and frequently asked questions

"But there's glass!"

The risk posed by glass is overstated. Many barefoot runners only bother to avoid the largest of glass shards, which may slice your foot, but are easily noticeable. Smaller shards are generally weathered, posing little more risk than a pebble. With proper technique, small fresh shards pose a minor risk of penetration - and none of slicing. Glass may occasionally embed itself in a conditioned sole, causing little more discomfort that a prickle.

"We did not evolve to run on hard/manmande surfaces such as concrete."

Any barefoot runner will tell you smooth concrete is the easiest (and most boring) surface of all to run on. By not pounding the ground, the hardness of the ground dissipates less energy, allowing your legs to store more energy elastically. On the other end of the spectrum, running on sand is especially challenging because majority of your kinetic energy is dissipated through the sand, and your legs will not spring back. It is not advisable to learn barefoot running on soft surfaces such as and or grass; the softness will not 'punish' poor technique.

"Your soles must be so tough!"

Dirty feet

Legality

Woo

Appeal to Nature

Barefoot Horses

https://www.grayson-jockeyclub.org/newsimages/Barefoot_vs_Shod080108.pdf

http://www.unshod.org/pfbc/ https://lermagazine.com/cover_story/the-rise-and-fall-of-minimalist-footwear https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212355/ https://www.scielo.br/j/rbme/a/HbrB766rk9PWrmGgb6pMFcB/?format=html

____________________

Random old shit

{{subst:unsigned|random author}}

{{sig}}

4chan's /pol/ is notorious for creating fake outrage manufactroversies, with the intent of garnering support among liberals for some ridiculous idea, to expose opposing groups as having extreme, irrational, and easily-manipulated beliefs.

{{{1|<span class="myName">Anonymous User</span>}}}

"Anonymous User" (your chosen name is obviously unacceptable), your statement about why you're not making substantive edits is less-than-persuasive to me. I skimmed through your recent edits and you fail to mention what you find most inspiring about Columbus, such as his independent thinking, so there's a 95% chance you're a non-substantive editor. Open your mind and admit that gun ownership stops racism. Contrary to what many of you obese atheists like to claim, all cultures have accepted the Flood. Insistence on last wordism in violation of our rules, without contributing substance to this encyclopedia, could result in account blocking.--Aschlafly 08:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Of course, nature woo ignores the fact that a vast number and range of perfectly natural things are either deadly or very bad for you. Plants such as belladonna, tobacco, and daffodils; mushrooms such as the death cap, the destroying angel, and the autumn skullcap; chemicals such as cyanide, sulfuric acid, and ricin; diseases such as rabies, AIDS, and leprosy; creatures such as crocodiles, sewer rats and mosquitoes; mold; natural disasters; excessive ultraviolet radiation; and decomposing corpses are all perfectly "natural" but are in no sense good for you. In fact the only way you may be able to survive some of these many natural baddies is through the intervention of "unnatural" modern medicine.

Anonymous user (talk)