?

There's more to it than that. See earlier and related posts.

OK.

'You jump into a huge debate about the future of RW and we're supposed to believe you haven't been looking at what's been going on?'

I can believe that.

'Especially after the anti-Human rant you posted?'

Meh. If everyone has to like Human to have good faith, we're going to have a serious problem.

'Given your change of name'

Oh come the fuck on.

'and the fact that you have been exposed as somebody willing to harm RW by doing whatever you can for CP'

That's relevant, but pretty dated. And I thought the general consensus on that was 'who cares?' RW is full of people who've split from and argued with the community in the past. The idea that RA/Stabby is on their side, as opposed to just being pissed off with people here, isn't so plausible to me.

I really don't see any evidence of bad faith, SR. If I've missed something, sorry, please tell me. But so far it just looks like you're vying over something unrelated to the edits topic in SB.

Well if you believe that's what he did, then you're accusing him of stupidity rather than trolling. Hardly an improvement. You don't jump into a big debate without knowing what's already happened unless you're an idiot.

Yes, I've posted anti-Human stuff before too, but this was of a sufficiently vicious nature that it went to the Coop.

You know what "Misanthrope" means, right?

Yes it's dated, but nobody else did anything similar.

Sure it was stupid. Stupidity isn't the same as bad faith.

I read it, and there was barely anything vicious about the anti-Human part. The huge 'fuck you' at the top was a pre-emptive jab at people who 'Think I'm silly for being bitter about something on the internet'. The Human part just said he acted like an objectivist, and that RW was his plaything.

You know what 'Replicant' means, right? Usernames shouldn't be considered serious statements. There's no way we could follow that principle.

Kinda depends what you mean by similar.

I've made no secret of my real identity since I outed myself. I'm rpeh - Robert Peter Edward Herbert, and perfectly happy to admit it. The reason I mention that post is that it seems to be part of a pattern. By itself it's not too bad (which is why I defended him in the Coop). As part of a pattern, it's worrying.