Talk:Jesus Is Savior

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon christianity.svg

This Christianity related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


In Google[edit]

I typed "dare being goth" and the "Jesus is savior" website was the first one to show up in the Google Search result list. Pretty shitty and frightening when you lack self-confidence and you're looking for advice about expressing yourself without being afraid of the other's glances. 92.136.161.181 (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Batshit Crazy?[edit]

Would this guy fit the category of Batshit crazy? S.H. DeLong (talk) 04:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Like, even more so than Reverend Zim_ulator? Probably! LlamaPastor31 In the name of Unicode! 04:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Jack Chick was more sane than him in my opinion --Draph91 (talk) 18:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

No supportable content.[edit]

I am a Protestant Minister. The website jesus-is-savior and its Stewart's other websites have done much more damage regarding the general perception regarding the actual literary value of the Judeo-Christian Protestant Bible. The Jesus-is-savior website does not link to nor mention credible and reliable source material, although it does occasionally link to random videos. If one is searching this site for supportable scholarly content, they will not find any.— Unsigned, by: 71.46.96.169 / talk / contribs

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Christopher (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

I think the website killed many brain cells.[edit]

It mak meee stooopid||||| --Rationalzombie94 (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Is Rational Wiki a satire site?[edit]

I wasn't able to find anything racist on Stewart's site. [1] It seems like this site has a problem with anyone who is Christian or at least not left wing.

PS: can I have my own article here? My name is Nils Weber, I was born in 1997, and I'm a YouTuber, musician, comedian and cartoonist. I can link you to my content if I am allowed to do so. 2003:C3:3725:3000:1886:87ED:4DF4:3B54 (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

We link to this page of his[2], which indicates how he is racist ("Marriage is permissible between the races. However, it is sinful and unbiblical to deliberately promote interracial marriage with the intent of unifying the world. There is an agenda today to promote marriage between different races. God segregated mankind in the Bible at Babel…"). You will not be allowed to promote yourself on mainspace pages, but you can create an account and put your information on your own homepage (userspace). The userspace pages don't get indexed by search engines though. Bongolian (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! BTW, nice try taking his words out of context. 2003:C3:3725:3000:1886:87ED:4DF4:3B54 (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Pedophile[edit]

You're calling this person a pedophile but the link [4] is dead. That's a serious accusation and I think you need to provide a citation or remove this claim. 57.135.233.22 (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the alert. I have replaced that link with a better one. Bongolian (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)