File talk:Characteristic polynomial - Conservapedia 1272837128503.png

Pardon me, but I don't see any major difference between the edits. It appears the only thing JacobB is harping about is a single space. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The devil is in the detail: JacobB created this edit only to be able to oversight the previous one! So, the previous edit comments about DouglasA's reversion being incorrect has disappeared, and only the edit comment sysops are not wrong remains visible. larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 22:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh. So what prompted the oversighting? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

One of the two sysops (JacobB or DouglasA) had to be wrong. And that cannot be. And therefore, it hasn't been. larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 22:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Lovely. How very Stalin-esque. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

I love that phrase of his. The Pope only claims infallibility when he's wearing his special infallibility hat and cape, but CP has a whole bunch (well, not many these days) of people who are infallible so long as they have ban hammers and oversight. --^{Ask me about our beak} 00:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)