Debate:Xenogenders

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by Rockford the Roe.


Should we even care about it?[edit]

So what snapped me out of my "only two genders" phase was realizing that non-binary people do in fact exist and I have never seen one identify what right-winged grifters keep saying. Since it's becoming more prevalent online, it's hard to differentiate them with transphobes pulling up bullshit like "animesexual", "dreamgender", "super straight", etc. What do y'all think? PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 19:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

I’m a bit confused by what xenogender means, @Rockford the Roe. Also, I have in fact seen non binary people on Wikipedia. Andrew5 mobile (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
I think that xenogenders are just a unique way to express nonbinary gender identities. I don't think there's any real issue with it, and policing how people identify isn't a good use of time. armed_roomba (she/her)What am I doing wrong this time? 19:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Non-binary genders is a factually-based concept (e.g., intersexism/hermaphroditism) that should be obvious to sane people. Xenogenderism is a crank idea that is not falsifiable. As a crank idea, yes, xenogenderism is worth caring about for RW. Bongolian (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)