Conservapedia talk:Blatant plagiarism/Clement Atlee

Gee, why use all those words twice when an "=" symbol would have done? Man... so should there be a category "CP plagiarism"? human^{be in} 18:56, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

I wasn't sure until I was done that they were exactly alike. Plus, I was experimenting with a format maybe useful for this sort of thing -- see [Great Depression]] for a more complicated example. As for plagiarism, isn't that covered under Commandment 1? (hrm. I'm not sure how to link to a category page!) --jtl^talk 20:21, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

I don't understand what you are getting at with this page. Are you saying that TK plagiarized? Because that is totally wrong. He added all those internal links which means that he didn't plagiarize (at least in his mind).--Staple^? 00:42, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

I'm not sure I want to get into a debate about what is or is not plagiarism. I think this is clearly a violation of both the 1st and 2nd Conservopedia:Commandmen]], though, and that's what I'm trying to show here. --jtl^talk 01:07, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

How about a "CP quoting without quote marks" cat, then.? I hope you realize, my first post above was tongue-in-cheek - I know why this is up there. human^{be in} 12:30, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

If this article is going to stay, someone should at least "CP" the links so they work. (like, [[CP:filename|filename]]}. And maybe just call it a CP file and let people figure out who wrote it. human^{be in} 00:22, 24 May 2007 (CDT)