Brights Movement

From RationalWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

The Brights Movement describes "brights" as follows: [1]

  • A bright is a person who has a naturalistic worldview.
  • A bright's worldview is free of supernatural and mystical elements.
  • The ethics and actions of a bright are based on a naturalistic worldview or humanism.

As a consequence "The Brights Movement" is naturally open to anyone who has a rationalistic or naturalistic worldview. It is essentially a re-branding of atheism.

Contents

[edit] Aims

The movement describes its aims as:

  • To promote the civic understanding and acknowledgment of the naturalistic worldview, which is free of supernatural and mystical elements.
  • To gain public recognition that persons who hold such a worldview can bring principled actions to bear on matters of civic importance.
  • To educate society toward accepting the full and equitable civic participation of all such individuals.

[edit] History

The term "bright" was coined (or stolen) to be used in this context in 2002 by Paul Geisert.[2] Similar to how the word "gay" came to be claimed by the homosexual community as an attempt to re-brand it as something positive. In that case, "gay" originally meant happy and was nonthreatening, in this case, "bright" is often taken to mean sharp and intelligent in quite a fun way, the complete opposite of what atheist has become in some parts of the world.

[edit] Enthusiastic brights

"Enthusiastic" brights supposedly include Daniel Dennett, James Randi, Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, and Penn & Teller.[3]

Some superb artwork and poetry produced by enthusiastic brights can be found here. It may or may not be representative of brights as a group.

[edit] Reception

The brights movement has met with mixed responses. Some, such as Dawkins, actively support the idea and self-declare themselves as a Bright. But there are many negative reactions to the movement, even from those who it would technically include. Its detractors find the choice of the term to be embarrassingly condescending - perhaps useful as snark or psrodt, but not as a name for a broad based umbrella movement. Indeed, this mixed reaction just goes to prove the old phrase about herding cats.

[edit] See also

[edit] Footnotes

  1. http://www.the-brights.net/
  2. Brights Net biography entry on Paul Geisert
  3. http://www.the-brights.net/people/enthusiastic/index.html
Personal tools