Talk:J. K. Rowling
Wow, that was fast.[edit]
"But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! |
---|
I can see that rational wiki is anything but rational. Thank you for so rapidly deleting my rational legitimate criticism of this page. Now I know I do not need to waste any more of my time with your wiki and that in the future, when I see a link to this wiki on any topic, I should ignore it. Most importantly, such a link is a sign the page that is linking is less than rational and so is also of dubious value. Here is a fact: censorship does not change truth. The truth does not care whether anyone believes it, and it does not care if it offends someone. The truth simply is. Sooner or later, you whosoever you are, dear censor, will learn this the hard way. Cheers — Unsigned, by: 2001:569:5208:8f00:73ae:eb51:1dcf:de5a / talk / contribs
|
Nothing on her Israel support[edit]
I absolutely gotta add something about that. I seem to remember she made some weird argument about how "Harry Potter wouldn't boycott Israel". Chillpilled (talk) 08:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- After having gone and written the section, I think she's just a two-stater. Thought she was all-in pro-Israel. Chillpilled (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
JK ROWLING IS RIGHT[edit]
"GUYS, I'M MALE, SO THAT MEANS I'M NOT A TERF" |
---|
First of all i am not a TERF (i am male) but this entire article is a smear against common sense. i am not a transphobe and believe that Ron DeSantis and other republican nazis are persecuting trans people. but I still think JK Rowling is a smart woman who's views on people with Non Materialistic Gender Beliefs (NMGB's) (a term i coined myself) should be considered. i am more in favor of the British "transphobes" (who are just promoting common sense) then i am of the American Transphobes who are abusing there power and stripping away trans peoples first amendment protections) I am American by the way. — Unsigned, by: 2601:152:A80:4D30:69E5:23F0:49DF:D7FD / talk / contribs
|
Oh Rowling, you rotter[edit]
- Oh Rowling, you rotter
- Oh what have you done
- You're fraternizing with far-right transphobes
- And you think it's good fun
I knew she's become an absolute disgrace, somehow made the lazy expanded lore behind her magnum opus even worse and alienated the very demographic she once inspired by writing a successful seven-part story about an orphaned misfit raised by an abusive family who one day learns there's a whole underground society of others like him and then has to take on a terrorist group based on blind hate towards a vexing demographic for dumb reasons to avenge his slain parents and protect his new family made along the way- but I didn't know she had gone so far off the rails as to cozy up to IRL Death Eaters- namely the alt-right (only replace "mudbloods" with "tr-nn--s" and "blood traitors" with "gender traitors"), but the disgraces to the good name of feminism known as TERFS I already knew of. Instead of being remembered for penning one of the few book series that people actually read more than once these days, she will instead be remembered in posterity as the self-appointed leader of that pseudo-feminist attempt to perpetuate transphobia. Give an alt-righter an inch, and they will take a mile. --Goatspeed. See what I'm up toCircularRasoningSee what I've been messing around with 03:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Length[edit]
We shouldn't sacrifice good content for less taxing reading (if a sentence must be wordy to convey itself fully, let it be wordy), but if there's a way to retain what's good while shortening parts that may be something we'd like to consider at some point. I may dive into such a task of summary on some boring day, myself... Chillpilled (talk) 00:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the Harry Potter sections could be its own article Ioe bidome (talk) 01:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)