User:Hojimachong/TK

Ideas Regarding TK

It is this editors humble opinion that TK (and all related accounts) be permanently banned from RationalWiki (and all related projects) without the possibility of parole.

Justification

• Throughout his several months of editing at RationalWiki, TK has shown no desire to improve any aspect of the site. However, inactivity and nonproductive editing is not justification for a block.
• In several instances, TK has been mean, divisive, and downright malicious.
• Many RW users can attest to receiving threatening, demeaning, and belittling private communique from TK.
• TK has a history of being a prolific Internet troll;
  • TK participated in Conservapedia as a "divider", refraining from writing content articles and instead insulting users and locking pages to provoke malicious words, which were then used as justification for blocking. While any reasonable person knows that internal division of CP is desirable, it does not help TKs case when he engages in this type of activity everywhere he goes.
  • Several stories exist (verification needed) that TK was a moderator of Hot or Not, causing several problems during his tenure there. This position is especially startling, because it is now believed by experts that "cyberbullying" can cause self-esteem issues, self-harm, and even suicide amongst teenage girls - the main audience of Hot or Not. These actions are especially malicious, and speak volumes about TKs character.
• Many RW users can attest to TK telling them one thing, and doing another. This suggests that TK is a compulsive liar.
• Lastly, anybody who has had any contact with TK knows that he is a malevolent and evil person, with a broken moral compass, who has no intention to do anything good, and is essentially a complex Internet troll.

For these reasons, I (Hojimachong) believe that TK (and all related accounts) be permanently banned from RationalWiki (and all related projects).

I also acknowledge that permanent blocking of an editor can lead down a slippery slope to other permanent blockings. However, I also realize that this is an extraordinary issue, and requires severe measures.

Discussion

Non-issue. He asked for his account to be permanently blocked and deleted on Wednesday. PFoster 11:48, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

I'm sorely out of the loop. Preserving this in case he ever decides to come back in any incarnation. --Hoji^die! 12:19, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

He later claimed in the discussion group that he never asked for his account to be deleted or blocked. Which is precisely the reason I didn't act on is private request (I was afraid he'd later disavow it and claim suppression). So he still could come back.-αmεσ (ninja) 13:03, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

A group needs an enemy to unite them. Let him stay. MarcusCicero 13:06, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

CP? Also, I'm not really a Nietzsche fan. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Let's sacrifice him to our gooooooooooooooooddddddddsss!-αmεσ (ninja) 13:11, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

Ames, I never joined the discussion group, but did he really say that? Idiotic on his part, as he sent the email to what, five people? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 13:27, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

 :) --Gulik 13:45, 29 March 2008 (EDT)