User talk:TK

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>

• Archive #1
• Archive #2
• Archive #3
• Archive #4
• Archive #5
• Archive #6
• Archive #7
• User_talk:TK/vandalism

---

Conservapedia Discussion Group - Visit this group!

---

Troll me if you so choose....

Seeing as how I no longer care one iota about Conservapedia, I will most likely be apathetic to not caring at all, if anything. Especially since I am one of the only people here that doesn't go completely apeshit when you show up. Gooniepunk2010 ^{Oi! Oi! Oi!} 07:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Dude, I have no idea what caused you to post here. I said I wasn't looking for a big wooo, your comment just struck me funny, is really all there was. If you want a longer discourse, my AIM and Google Talk are pretty well known to lots of regular editors here. Again, peace! --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 08:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Alrighty. As you said, peace! AnarchoGoon ^{Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living} 08:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Goonie, watch out. TK has a well known wide stance. ħuman 08:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Drunk again, Huw? Why not turn in and save me from hurling this close to bedtime. Talk about trolling! --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 08:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to hurl, you congenital liar. ħuman 09:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Huw, you and I never converse, never have, you never get anything that is first-hand from me, so you wouldn't know a lie if it shit on your bed. You are just another intolerant liberal, so be proud of that, and quit throwing your insults around, Mr. Bully. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 09:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

OMG I almost blocked you for being a moron. But I didn't. ħuman 09:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Should have. Really. Šţěŗĭļė truffle 01:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Protip

If you are unhappy with this website, click here it will solve all your problems. - π 08:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Typical thuggish resolution for here, yet you continue to do the pot/kettle bit. If you don't like what I say, why do you keep posting here? BTW, I really do enjoy the typical knee-jerk posts here whenever I say anything, or someone here asks a question. I couldn't make up the vile intolerance and just plain meanness most here demonstrate, so it makes it easier for me to show outsiders what this place is mostly about. Cheers! --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 09:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

That would only work if you were able to keep your calm - but no, you shit on the bed larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 09:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Pretty unfair, LArron when you don't make the same comment about Huw's insult, or Pi's. Why do I need to keep calm? More special rules that apply to me and not the other hot-heads here? FYI, I am calm, and anyone outside the Kool-Aid drinkers can see, plainly and clearly, I have said nothing in response that wasn't in the same spirit already previously posted to me. Another liberal intolerance, like I said. I have never invited any user here to come to this page in response to my posts elsewhere on this wiki. If there aren't rules just for me, perhaps I should take the insults proffered here to other pages, other talk pages, so this can really become another HCM. But that's really want you want, isn't it? Bored that much? If you so totally disagree with everything I say, why keep responding? --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 09:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Anyone notice that the evil monster is still free to edit here? Whodathunkit?! ħuman 09:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

This time, you mean. My history here has been one of constant blocks, so often and so frequently, that it is nearly impossible to respond. What's left in the block log for me, which hasn't been expunged, I wouldn't know, since users not sysops are kept from seeing all sorts of things here, given you have so much to hide. The last time I was around, the log said someone blocked me infinitely, and since no one emailed to inform me it was removed, why would I think otherwise? Do you really deny Huw that I have traditionally been the subject of harassment blocks here of a different type and length than users you agree with? How is that not intolerance? Thanks by making my point, as usual, with your mean-spirited (liberal mode) comments. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 09:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

You don't need to keep calm - you may cry insults the whole day long, it doesn't bother me. But this isn't helping when you want to show the vile intolerance and just plain meanness most here demonstrate.

larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 10:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Wrong again. The victim of the insults of members here, responding in kind after trying to dialog, cannot be turned into my being the attacker, LArron. Not in a rational thinking mind that is. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 10:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

What's left in the block log for me, which hasn't been expunged, I wouldn't know, since users not sysops are kept from seeing all sorts of things here, given you have so much to hide. If the block-logs could be messed with, wouldn't you have done so at CP? No, logs are sacrosanct - not because you wish them to be so, but because that's the way of wikimedia. larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 10:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I have been told directly by others here, and have seen it happen, that those with database access can manipulate the logs. Just because you have been told they cannot be changed, or you want to believe they aren't, isn't some kind of proof. Why else would RW make everyone except those they agree with, or never logon an admin then? Do you deny you can see hidden edits while I cannot? --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 10:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

And, ironically, you dumb fuck Terry, I sysoped you against all arguments by others a couple times a while back. Check the logs, you stupid shit. Just because you utterly warp the records over at CP doesn't mean we do that here. ħuman 10:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

And how quickly was my being a sysop removed by others, and how utterly without knowledge was I about how this place works, or where to find stuff was I? Your own edit comment said as much, that since things were so well hidden here I was of no threat....an insult for something you now try to put forth as some exhibit of your fairness, Huw? Most non-members here, and not at CP believe it was all contrived just for "entertainment". --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 10:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Your paranoia and projection are amusement enough. I sysoped you in good faith, moron. Sadly, it seems there are several hundred people here who hate your guts, so it didn't fly. Get it, Terry? People have a deep and abiding hatred of you. Yeah, they don't like you. I wonder why? ħuman 10:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Mainly because of the lies you and others perpetuate, Huw. In good faith, really? Odd you never contacted me about it. And don't say you never ask anyone else before making them a sysop, because I have never, not once, ever been treated like anyone else, because you and other haters like to keep the focus on me. Other CP Sysops were demoted to sysop, still are. Why? Because they never logon. Save the hysterical histrionics about your good faith, Huw. Several hundred? Really? I count about a dozen haters who instigated the whole bit. Time for sleep now, thanks for providing more instances of intolerance. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 10:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Goodnight. - π 10:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Sleepwalking much? At least, you are editing at Conservapedia at this moment... larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 11:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Do you make such inquiries to other members here, or am I just being singled out again? I am not allowed to change my mind, or did you and others just engage in childish baiting just to get a reaction? I am fairly certain that couldn't be the case with such self-proclaimed rational people and fair-minded liberals! --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 11:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I work it out (as in I looked it up) as 4:53am in California. Get some sleep, dude. - π 11:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Not much of an inquiry - I just happened to look at cp:Special:RecentChanges. Are you singled out? I don't know - has anyone else declared that it is time for sleep now? larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 12:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

As I said, do you single out other users to distort what they say, is this another example of "liberal tolerance"? And actually what I said it was time for sleep now, but I fail to see where I said it was time for me to sleep, or anyone specifically. I hope you are more precise with math! --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 12:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I think we need night mode on RW. Bondurant (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

We have people from all over the world editing here, it would be inconvenient for me at the least. Just because some people can't regulate their nap times so they are not cranky when the do the wiking is no reason to punish the rest of us. - π 12:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Apologies, Π, I forgot to use the </snark> tag. Bondurant (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

"I have never, not once, ever been treated like anyone else". And yet, you never stop to ask yourself why, just whine about being hated. Nobody hates for the sake of hating. face it, sweetheart, it's not us... it's you. --PsygremlinParlez! 11:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I learned early on how racist white liberals really are.

Could you please share some of your experiences that lead you to 'learn' that? DeltaStar_{Senior Sysop}^{Speciationspeed!} 11:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Slapped by Andy!

Oh no! How embarrassing is it when the great and glorious Schlafly deletes a brand new story you added^img rather than patting you on the head? –SuspectedReplicant retire me 00:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

In Tk's defense (Did I really just type that?) Andy didn't delete it, he just moved it lower down the ranks. You see, that was a positive story about the Democrats, even if CP tried to spin in their way. Andy would much rather have his wet dream that the Democrats will fail tomorrow (which is a possibility) rather than announce that they, you know, accepted a critique and changed their plans. SirChuckB^{Boom Goes the Dynamite} 00:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I made a mistake. Still, the basic point applies: the master didn't think much of the apprentice's story. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 00:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

The "basic point" applies only if one has the mentality of a fifteen-year-old, and thinks keeping track of such minutia applies to "getting points" or "keeping score". Do you honestly believe (as opposed to just trolling my talk page for self-congratulation and your audience here) that real adults give any thought to such BS? Really? And do you really think the Democrat leadership was happy about abandoning their clever plan? Think again. It was the 80% opposed to such tactics by likely voters, liberal and conservative, that changed their minds. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 00:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes I do. That's why many of your peers post "Can I have a gold star!" requests on your master's talk page. On the other point, the Democrat leadership weren't "defeated" on "Deem and Pass" - they decided not to bother with it because they believe they have the votes. More lies from TK. Even Faux news doesn't claim it as a defeat! As least keep your lies plausible. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 01:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You're only here to cause trouble because you've run out of people to harass and block on CP, so don't start crying when people here call you out for what you are: a liar and a parodist. Oh - and notice that when I make a mistake, I admit it. I don't oversight it. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 01:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Seems to me that the only people saying I am here to cause trouble are intolerant assholes, SR, who simply need a bogeyman to hate one. I can only see civil discussion with a few who are actually interested in intellectual discussion wherever I have been on this wiki, except for the kiddie-like trolls posting nasty insults on my own talk page. As for your admitting mistakes, is that in the hidden comments only Sysops here can see? The rest of us cannot see all those hidden comments, remember? --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 04:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I think your choice of BG color for your talk page is perfect. And quit calling everyone you disagree with a teenager or "kiddie". What "hidden comments"? This wiki is not run like the voices in your head run CP. ħuman 05:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

~Yawn~ That repeated party line isn't fooling anyone, Huw. And was that some Admin order about my own personal opinion that hate and trolling garbage comes from kids? Have I violated some rule here saying that? Please forgive me if I have. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 05:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Well if this is to be believed you were banned for five years, less than five years ago. So I would guess you violated a rule by posting at all. - π 06:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

All I meant was that the poop color was a good choice. The rest of your comment is unintelligible, like most of your posts. ħuman 06:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Well I also extend to you an invitation to not post here again, because it seems to be a waste of your talent and efforts, Huw, and I don't wish to put you out. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 06:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, it's no problem to edit the poop-colored page. please continue to amuse us with your illiteracy and confusion about how various wikis work. Oh, and how our "brain" works. You are lots of fun. ħuman 06:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Despicable comes to mind in thinking of you. You most likely torture small animals too. Too bad with your kind of work your clients wouldn't mind your or expect different than you being here. Oh well. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 06:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm rubber and you are glue.... hehe, you are such a moron. I "torture small animals"? Like you? ħuman 07:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

DMorris

TK, don't be fooled by DMorris. His only allegiance is to himself. Keegscee (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The part where I try to be civil to someone reviled here

So, is it true that you sat in on a Slayer recording session? Punky ^{Your mental puke relief} 07:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Taxes, Taxes and more Taxes

Regarding the start of this edit to CP main page talk. The difference is representation. The Tea tax was levied without colonial representation. They had no say in matter. The Health Care bill was passed by the Senate, who are elected by the people (except for a few appointments), passed by the House, who are also elected by the people and signed into law by the President, who is, get this, elected by the people. There are three seperate levels of representation. Just because your side lost does not make it tyranny. SirChuckB^{Please Excuse me, I have to go out and hunt giraffes} 18:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't see it as "my side" losing, Chuck. I see it as a loss for the American people in the long run, and especially those under-served with health care. Medicaid is so absolutely crappy now that Washington's response is to give the poor more of it, and they exempted themselves and their staff from it too because they know its shitty! Tell me what has changed in a few hundred years from when they gave an entire race 40 acres and a mule as "compensation" for enslavement? --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 20:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

What's the difference, in principle, between providing healthcare (a la British NHS) and providing things like military defence? Are they both as "socialist" as each other? Or is there something very different, ideologically, between the two? I ask simply because I wish to know. Ajkgordon (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I take it you are talking about military service, serving in the armed forces, and national health? --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 20:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Isn't it obvious? State healthcare helps people, but military spending is ideally for harming them. We're talking about TK here. Cubic wisest Hoover! 20:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

No, I mean just the provision of the service. The state provides its citizen's with defence. The state provides its citizens with healthcare. Why object to one and not the other? Not being provocative, just interested. (As an aside, historically they are quite different. It was about power. Perhaps it still is.) Ajkgordon (talk)

You avoided the question TK. I am not debating the health bill itself, I am solely talking about you comparing it to the tea tax. The tea tax was levied to pay for a war we didn't care about, by a government that gave us no say. The Health care bill had plenty of representation, one side just came out the loser of the battle. By my calulations, there were over 500 individual representatives that voted in the matter. By the way, you do know that we never got that 40 acres right? Or the mule. SirChuckB^{Further bulletins as events warrant} 22:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)