User talk:TK

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>

• Archive #1
• Archive #2
• Archive #3
• Archive #4
• Archive #5
• Archive #6
• Archive #7
• User_talk:TK/vandalism

---

Conservapedia Discussion Group - Visit this group!

---

Parsing

You keep misusing the word 'parsing'. What do you think it means?-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 11:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

That would depend upon what you think the word "it" is, David. --TK_/MyTalk^"Editor 08:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Come on, Mr Funnyman. If you have time for inane jokes, you have time to prove you're not a lying weasel. E-mail please. --PsygremlinSiarad! 08:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I am just waiting for you to do what you have since age 5, so perhaps 10 years now, Psy....stomp your little feet and turn blue holding your breath. Or in your case, perhaps it will be you wishing me into the Corn? --TK_/MyTalk^Editor 11:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Is that a Twilight Zone reference? JazzMan 23:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

So, just that we're clear on this... you are going back on your word, just as I expected? Oh and if you're thinking of googling my name and dropping a line to my boss - which you have done to others before - I am my own boss, so feel free to drop me a line. Or even better, drop by the office, we can do a beer. Hemlock on the rocks is yours I believe. PsygremlinPrata! 12:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Dear Psy: It wasn't me who contacted someone's boss, years ago now. It was another Admin. Do try to get your facts straight. And I wouldn't answer because I asked for your real name, and you didn't send it, as agreed. Threatening poison is typical of the left, and doesn't exactly instill confidence that you are anything other than what you are. --TK_/MyTalk^Editor 12:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but seeing as Brian isn't hypocritical enough to post here, I didn't want to drag him into it too - and the guys from Hot or Not certainly dispute your claim. But of course you'd say something like that, to weasel out of your agreement. Next you'll be asking for a passport, I suppose. Suffice to say you welched on the deal, as expected. And as for the poison, I'm guessing your dry sense of humour must be on the blink today. Maybe too much exposure to Brian's cartoons? --PsygremlinSnakk! 13:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for finally admitting the dozen of so posts of yours claiming I contacted people at work or their employers, is a lie. I would settle for a copy of your drivers license, assuming you are old enough to drive, Psy. James Hong disputes what claim? I see/talk to him regularly, so much for another of your lies. I haven't weaseled, and like your false charge of me contacting someone's work, your lie about sending your real name is just that. This ends our "conversation". I assume you will continue to troll this page anyway...have fun! --TK_/MyTalk^Editor 13:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Who said anything about James Hong? I'm talking about the others you harassed on HoN. I'm guessing you talk to Hong about as often as your talk to Ed Meese and Lucile Ball - when you sit next to her on the plane. And I stand by my comments that you called people at work - shall I ask PalMD to back me up on this? And I'll call you on your other claim - seeing as you think I sent you a false name, I'm quite willing for you to post what you think my name is right here. I've got nothing to hide. Or you can continue to run. Your call. Or, you send me your driver's licence and I'll send you my pilot's licence. --PsygremlinParlez! 13:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

LIAR. Terry you have NEVER met James Hong, you do not see him or speak to him and he hasn't answered an email from you since 2007. LIAR LIAR LIAR. Prove it. I DARE you. I do correspond with James, and I just may post up his (public) email addy so anyone can ask him. James considers Terry Koeckritz a kook, a psycho and he personally removed him as an Admin for HotorNot, then had to shut down the moderator board because of TK's repeated vile, profane posts threatening other users - want proof? I have the screen shots to this day. Terry, you are a LIAR. But what else can we expect from you, after all, you did claim to throw yourself in front of Nancy Reagan to save her from a sniper. LOLLOLOL!!! 193.200.150.137 (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Gauntlet thrown! Excellent BON. ^{I have just eaten} _& stilton^talk 12:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Would love to see that proof BON, would make an excellent addition to TK's article here. Terry, I'll await your apology - you can mail it - you have my address. --PsygremlinHable! 12:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your Email.

Hello TK - why have you sent me an email detailing the fact the ToP blocked you for an hour? I don't care, why don't you email him? Aceⁱ⁹ 19:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

TK, feel free to email me regarding any such further inconveniences. I care very much. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Ace, I emailed you because you asked me a question here that I could not answer due to being blocked. The fact that you changed the block to 31 seconds shows you at least cared about the image of RW, and the singling out of one user contrary to its Guidelines. Thanks, Neveruse, however the history here shows any semblance of fairness is always protested loudly and acquiesced to, by a small segment of dried-up haters who care nothing for logic. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 21:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't care less if you were blocked for an hour. Don't know why I changed it. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

~Yawn~ --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 22:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You're yawning? You emailed me you idiot. If anyone should yawn it should be me. Aceⁱ⁹ 23:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

"Liberal cyber bullies"

Wow. You just have absolutely, no conscience at all, do you? SJ ^Debaser 00:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I think the comments on this page, and elsewhere, about me and others, prove what liberal sensibilities are quite clearly. The same kind of taunting and vile name calling, in place of reasoned arguments against what a person believes, is shown here daily, like the taunts described in the news article about that girl. There are few places on the Internet that use personal attacks (a defacto policy of personal destruction) as consistently as Rational Wiki. The constant "un-funny" longer blocks and vandal binning of users some at RW disagree with, as opposed to the short term blocks given to users who are mostly agreed with, are self-mockery on the part of RW, showing most of their guidelines are BS, making this place not notable inasmuch as your dejour blocking policy is not different from CP. --TK_/MyTalk^{RW User #45} 01:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)