Difference between revisions of "User talk:Proxima Centauri/Archive2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::::The way to address it is by commenting on the talk page of the relevant article at RWW. Although you shouldn't edit the article about you, you can comment if you think anything in it is unreasonable, & other editors will take it into consideration. Although most RWW editors are also RWians, there is still a boundary between the sites & it's best to discuss issues re RWW content & editing at RWW rather than here at RW. {{User:Weaseloid/sig}} 11:15, 5 January 2009 (EST) | ::::::The way to address it is by commenting on the talk page of the relevant article at RWW. Although you shouldn't edit the article about you, you can comment if you think anything in it is unreasonable, & other editors will take it into consideration. Although most RWW editors are also RWians, there is still a boundary between the sites & it's best to discuss issues re RWW content & editing at RWW rather than here at RW. {{User:Weaseloid/sig}} 11:15, 5 January 2009 (EST) | ||
:::::::For now I've reverted what I assume are the offending edits. Please discuss it further at Rationalwikiwiki. {{User:Weaseloid/sig}} 11:37, 5 January 2009 (EST) | :::::::For now I've reverted what I assume are the offending edits. Please discuss it further at Rationalwikiwiki. {{User:Weaseloid/sig}} 11:37, 5 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | Talking about things over there and showing that I mind can easlily encourage the cyberbullies. It looks like I have to cut down the time I spend here seriously and permanently. It needs to be deleted from the records. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 11:38, 5 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:38, 5 January 2009
This is an archive page, last updated 5 January 2009. Please do not make edits to this page.
Barnstar
|
Barnstar | |
| For your tireless contributions to RationalWiki, I award you this barnstar. |
Thanks. Proxima Centauri 14:17, 1 January 2009 (EST)
Formatting
Why are the editing tabs and sidebar shrunken on your page, and why do external links look like internal links? Phantom Hoover 09:31, 3 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't know. I think I should archive the page but I don't know how to. Proxima Centauri 12:59, 3 January 2009 (EST)
- I've archived it. There was something on there doing it, a skim(!) didn't find it & the archive's now infected. If there's anything you want back here, just cut & paste it. Toast 13:21, 3 January 2009 (EST)
- I've located & fixed the problem in the archive. It was Wazza's fault - trying to indent a userbox template. De-archive if you want to. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 13:51, 3 January 2009 (EST)
- Thanks. Proxima Centauri 14:45, 3 January 2009 (EST)
- I've located & fixed the problem in the archive. It was Wazza's fault - trying to indent a userbox template. De-archive if you want to. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
- I've archived it. There was something on there doing it, a skim(!) didn't find it & the archive's now infected. If there's anything you want back here, just cut & paste it. Toast 13:21, 3 January 2009 (EST)
Privacy
Unfortunately Rationalwikiwiki doesn’t respect my right to privacy. Some RationalWikians have influence there. Unless this changes I will cut down drastically on my use of both wikis. I’m reluctant to do this but privacy is important. Proxima Centauri 07:17, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- Dare I ask what they've actually done? Is it IDing you as a previous user or one at Liberapedia? ArmondikoVpathetic 07:28, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- Surely they can only write what you've placed on the net already? I know I've said things online that I wish I hadn't, but that's my problem. For instance, I got on well with Karajou in his old Wikipedia days (we were adding some reality to wp:Bermuda Triangle), which one user here has since waved in my face. What of it? Unless they're digging out my paypal details it's not a problem. Totnesmartin 08:00, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- It matters because there are Internet safety issues involved. I don't want anti atheist fanatics or other bad people tracking me down. A minority of RationaLwikians are troublesome. Most RationalWikians are decent people. I don't know what the decent majority can do about the minority. Proxima Centauri 10:12, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- Unfortunately, what the decent majority can do about the indecent minority is exactly the same as what the indecent majority often does to the decent minority. You can try and edit out info from RWW but no doubt it'll get reverted and an edit war is just going to draw attention rather let any personal info that does slip out go under the radar. ArmondikoVpathetic 10:23, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- PC, I understand where you're coming from--there's stuff on my RWW page that I wish wasn't there, but the fact that it's there is my own damn fault. And to be fair, for any of us to bitch about privacy violations when we do a lot of the same stuff re: Ken de Meyer and Andrew Schlafly, to name two, is kinda hypocritical...TheoryOfPractice 10:53, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- The way to address it is by commenting on the talk page of the relevant article at RWW. Although you shouldn't edit the article about you, you can comment if you think anything in it is unreasonable, & other editors will take it into consideration. Although most RWW editors are also RWians, there is still a boundary between the sites & it's best to discuss issues re RWW content & editing at RWW rather than here at RW. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐMethinks it is a Weasel 11:15, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- For now I've reverted what I assume are the offending edits. Please discuss it further at Rationalwikiwiki. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐMethinks it is a Weasel 11:37, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- For now I've reverted what I assume are the offending edits. Please discuss it further at Rationalwikiwiki. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
- The way to address it is by commenting on the talk page of the relevant article at RWW. Although you shouldn't edit the article about you, you can comment if you think anything in it is unreasonable, & other editors will take it into consideration. Although most RWW editors are also RWians, there is still a boundary between the sites & it's best to discuss issues re RWW content & editing at RWW rather than here at RW. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
- PC, I understand where you're coming from--there's stuff on my RWW page that I wish wasn't there, but the fact that it's there is my own damn fault. And to be fair, for any of us to bitch about privacy violations when we do a lot of the same stuff re: Ken de Meyer and Andrew Schlafly, to name two, is kinda hypocritical...TheoryOfPractice 10:53, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- Unfortunately, what the decent majority can do about the indecent minority is exactly the same as what the indecent majority often does to the decent minority. You can try and edit out info from RWW but no doubt it'll get reverted and an edit war is just going to draw attention rather let any personal info that does slip out go under the radar. ArmondikoVpathetic 10:23, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- It matters because there are Internet safety issues involved. I don't want anti atheist fanatics or other bad people tracking me down. A minority of RationaLwikians are troublesome. Most RationalWikians are decent people. I don't know what the decent majority can do about the minority. Proxima Centauri 10:12, 5 January 2009 (EST)
- Surely they can only write what you've placed on the net already? I know I've said things online that I wish I hadn't, but that's my problem. For instance, I got on well with Karajou in his old Wikipedia days (we were adding some reality to wp:Bermuda Triangle), which one user here has since waved in my face. What of it? Unless they're digging out my paypal details it's not a problem. Totnesmartin 08:00, 5 January 2009 (EST)
Talking about things over there and showing that I mind can easlily encourage the cyberbullies. It looks like I have to cut down the time I spend here seriously and permanently. It needs to be deleted from the records. Proxima Centauri 11:38, 5 January 2009 (EST)