Difference between revisions of "User talk:PalMD"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Do you really believe this nonsense?: Profoundly inappropriate timing.)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
==Do you really believe this nonsense?==
 
==Do you really believe this nonsense?==
 
 
I'm concerned at the level of misinformation being level at Paul. I'm not a Paulite by any stretch but I'd have hoped at the very least that accuracy would be what we strive for. [[User:MarcusCicero|MarcusCicero]] 12:22, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
I'm concerned at the level of misinformation being level at Paul. I'm not a Paulite by any stretch but I'd have hoped at the very least that accuracy would be what we strive for. [[User:MarcusCicero|MarcusCicero]] 12:22, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
:I don't know that much about the guy, but hey, if you have factual edits to make, just put them up on the talk page for <s>evisceration</s> discussion along with referrences so we can all cross check each other.  You axed the school prayer thing, and it turns out the guy has sponsored ammedments, so there was no reason to remove it than I can tell. He certainly has some very troubling friends (so do I, though).[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-Did that sound a little harsh?</sup>]] 14:44, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
:I don't know that much about the guy, but hey, if you have factual edits to make, just put them up on the talk page for <s>evisceration</s> discussion along with referrences so we can all cross check each other.  You axed the school prayer thing, and it turns out the guy has sponsored ammedments, so there was no reason to remove it than I can tell. He certainly has some very troubling friends (so do I, though).[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-Did that sound a little harsh?</sup>]] 14:44, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Blocking Ungtss==
 +
Have you lost your mind, PalMD?  Blocking Ungtss, even a "joke" block, sends entirely the wrong message.  Users that have been driven away are not in the mood for joke blocks.  They will just see it as more persecution.  And '''I''', unlike you it seems, want Ungtss to stay.  --{{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 23:59, 18 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 04:59, 19 February 2008

Archives for this talk page: , (new)

Hah!

You can be the Prostate Avenger all you want, but I'm the first one to block all 42 sysops, sequentially and alphabetically! Although there was a sort of "what the..." moment when I realized the number came to a perfect 42. --Kels 20:11, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Well, my office mate has bigger hands than me anyway, so I'm no real and imminent threat to rectums.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 20:13, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Are you sure you got that right? "There are 1,009 registered users, of which 41 (or 4.06%) have Sysops rights." Is sensitive man really a sysop? But, nitpicking aside, congratulations, you should make yourself a sticky little medal of goatery for your efforts! humanUser talk:Human 20:14, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Re: RKive - I was just about to suggest that! humanUser talk:Human 20:16, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Mister Sensitive there actually is part of the sysop group, take a look for yourself. And by my numbering, there are 42 sysops total, and Sid got the honour of being pi. --Kels 21:30, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Also, I suck at making medals and stuff. And it's kinda tacky to be awarding prizes to myself. Maybe if someone else thinks I'm deserving they can do the honours. --Kels 21:31, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I supect you may have counted the default sysop? How else could I have quoted the site stats that say there were 41? As far as medals, well, make yourself a mocking one! Good practice, eh? PS, that "sensitive man ain't a sysop no more... PS, I suck at makin' medals and such too, but I made a really cool one for "tommy too loose" way back when, it took hours of geometric construction and overlays of layers, & c. Surely you are worth that effort? humanUser talk:Human 00:28, 31 January 2008 (EST)


And, lo! A great crack split the sky, and out forth poured all the Host of Heaven. And God smiled upon thee, and gaveth you this sacred Cookie, that your blood sugar may never be barren.

Cookie half.jpg For demonstrating exemplary goatery in the line of duty, Radioactive afikomen
has awarded you a used pre-owned! and slightly stale cookie.
Ewwwwwww.
Cockroaches ate half of it.

Here, my child! Taketh thee this cookie, that it may tide you over until the End Days. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:14, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I'm pretty sure I won't be touching it before then, so it sounds good. --Kels 06:36, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Since you are a doctor

Visiting your blog, this came to my mind: have you ever followed the adventures of Andrew Chung, MD, on Usenet? I haven't visited newsgroups for a long time, but his case was quite remarkable. He started as a helpful cardiologist in sci.med.cardiology back in the Nineties I think. Then he must have had some traumatic real life happenings and his conversion to a fundamentalist "christian" made things worse. He devised his 2PD diet, which first was "eat two pounds (2PD) of food every day", then became some sign from God (did they eat two pounds of manna when they escaped from Egypt?). While "eat less" may be a reasonable suggestion, he became a pathologic case for you doctors, when confronted on his total lack of understanding of metabolism, nutrition, physiology and physical exercise. Last time I visited newsgroups, he infested and cross-posted on most sci.med and diabetes NGs, lying, converting, talking about thousands of subjects who succesfully tried his diet (and that would be, reasonable people conjectured, the thousands of manna eaters in the Bible), hating all doubters. I guess he is a speaker for some Church and falsifies his qualifications - but he IS (was?) a certified cardiologist anyway. When I was reading both sci.med.* and talk.origins and learned about CP, I almost suggested him to become an editor there. Cheers, Editor at CPBring TK back 10:17, 31 January 2008 (EST)

You are a

Harmonic harmonic cube!

--מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹוםN Pal, Are you gonna add all these luverly templates to myour list? SusanMiouw 16:55, 8 February 2008 (EST)

I may need your help with that, you deluded
tush face.  Oh, and There are inorganic amino acids on Enceladus that are smarter than you!162.82.215.199 17:03, 8 February 2008 (EST)
It's real easy, tush face. Just edit the appropriate alpha section, copy an entry and There are inorganic amino acids on Enceladus that are smarter than you in a typical deluded
fashion. humanUser talk:Human 19:31, 8 February 2008 (EST)

IRC

Care to join our little party? --Linus(plot evil tech) 13:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Do you really believe this nonsense?

I'm concerned at the level of misinformation being level at Paul. I'm not a Paulite by any stretch but I'd have hoped at the very least that accuracy would be what we strive for. MarcusCicero 12:22, 15 February 2008 (EST)

I don't know that much about the guy, but hey, if you have factual edits to make, just put them up on the talk page for evisceration discussion along with referrences so we can all cross check each other. You axed the school prayer thing, and it turns out the guy has sponsored ammedments, so there was no reason to remove it than I can tell. He certainly has some very troubling friends (so do I, though).--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 14:44, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Blocking Ungtss

Have you lost your mind, PalMD? Blocking Ungtss, even a "joke" block, sends entirely the wrong message. Users that have been driven away are not in the mood for joke blocks. They will just see it as more persecution. And I, unlike you it seems, want Ungtss to stay. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:59, 18 February 2008 (EST)